DVLA useless
Author
Discussion

318is boy

Original Poster:

106 posts

223 months

Monday 5th December 2011
quotequote all
The DVLA really are frigging useless. I bought my flat over a year ago yet I continue to receive car tax letters for the previous owners who moved away. I have 'returned to sender' two or three of these letters and when I phoned up today to ask why I was still getting them she said I would have to write a letter stating the name of the person who no longer lived at the property along with their car registration....

How the bloody hell am I supposed to know what there car reg is or was? And why should it be my responsibility anyway if someone else isn't bothering to tax their motor? Might just let it run and run and see how far the morons actually go for untaxed vehicles!

soad

34,279 posts

197 months

Monday 5th December 2011
quotequote all
Poor rant, where's all the swearing?

Ean218

2,031 posts

271 months

Monday 5th December 2011
quotequote all
So the nice lady at the DVLA is suggesting you interfere with someone else's mail, I don't think that would go down too well.

If you've marked it gone away, RTS and the post office have returned it then they are perfectly entitled to open it themselves!

However, what exactly should they then do? They have a record with your address but do not have another with which to replace it.

Bezerk

457 posts

180 months

Monday 5th December 2011
quotequote all
Letters ----> Bin

Done.

littleredrooster

6,110 posts

217 months

Monday 5th December 2011
quotequote all
So the eejit who moved out hasn't notified them of change of address, but somehow that's the fault of the DVLA? Where else should they try to send stuff?

soad

34,279 posts

197 months

Monday 5th December 2011
quotequote all
Bin those letters and forget about it, even if it's annoying to receive them on a regular basis.

NiceCupOfTea

25,518 posts

272 months

Monday 5th December 2011
quotequote all
littleredrooster said:
So the eejit who moved out hasn't notified them of change of address, but somehow that's the fault of the DVLA? Where else should they try to send stuff?
Because the stuff has been RTS'd to them and they have been rung but they have no contingency plan other than suggesting the OP commit mail fraud.

A more intelligent position would be to receive the returned mail, open it, stop sending reminders to the wrong address, and track the errant owner another way.

Still, it seems de rigeur on here to criticise the OP whatever they have written!

saaby93

32,038 posts

199 months

Monday 5th December 2011
quotequote all
NiceCupOfTea said:
Still, it seems de rigeur on here to criticise the OP whatever they have written!
and drop a hint that theyre heavily built?

littleredrooster

6,110 posts

217 months

Monday 5th December 2011
quotequote all
NiceCupOfTea said:
Because the stuff has been RTS'd to them and they have been rung but they have no contingency plan other than suggesting the OP commit mail fraud.
But it's not up to DVLA to take the word of a third-party that the RK no longer lives there - that's the sole duty of the RK surely. How can the DVLA be responsible for that?? What contingency can they have when they have a legal duty to deliver mail to his last known address?
My neighbour has frequent deliveries of high-value items. I think I will phone his supplier and tell them that he no longer lives there and they should cease deliveries. Same thing - or am I missing the bloody obvious?

NiceCupOfTea

25,518 posts

272 months

Monday 5th December 2011
quotequote all
What does your neighbour's internet shopping habits have to do with it?

The OP has done the DVLA a favour - now they should be verifying the phone call by other methods - and not by asking the OP to spend time sorting a problem that is nothing to do with him!