The Book of Eli
Author
Discussion

Beefmeister

Original Poster:

16,482 posts

261 months

Wednesday 7th December 2011
quotequote all
Now, i'll admit i'm a sucker for any post-apocalyptic film, but I really enjoyed this one.

Denzel Washington puts in a good performance as a very thoughtful, spiritual man that can also kick all kinds of ass.

Really enjoyed it. But for those who have watched it - a question (Spoiler):



So, was he supposed to be blind then? I know the book was in braille, but was he blind or could he just read braille?

I may have it watch it again to see if there were any tell tale signs...


Chris77

956 posts

225 months

Wednesday 7th December 2011
quotequote all
I think that some things point that way but others not so, like the bit he backs under the tunnel to fight, or not reacting in the usual way to certain events, yet can work a bow and arrow with amazing accuracy???

JFReturns

3,833 posts

202 months

Wednesday 7th December 2011
quotequote all
Don't think he was blind - he was squinting into the sunlight and put his shades on in one scene.

Great film though!

toppstuff

13,698 posts

278 months

Wednesday 7th December 2011
quotequote all
Of course he was blind. That is the whole point of the film.

His added abilities were a part of his strength and a function of his faith. That is why he prevailed and ultimately achieved his goal.

A great film, if it was a bit evangelical.

p1doc

3,845 posts

215 months

Wednesday 7th December 2011
quotequote all
very good film with not expected ending for me!
martin

JFReturns

3,833 posts

202 months

Wednesday 7th December 2011
quotequote all
Well according to my esteemed colleagues, it is obvious that he is blind, and that is the whole point of the film.

Whoosh.


Megaflow

11,635 posts

256 months

Wednesday 7th December 2011
quotequote all
Agreed. Cracking film.

In fact so good, I might have to add it to the collection.

Beefmeister

Original Poster:

16,482 posts

261 months

Wednesday 7th December 2011
quotequote all
toppstuff said:
Of course he was blind. That is the whole point of the film.

His added abilities were a part of his strength and a function of his faith. That is why he prevailed and ultimately achieved his goal.

A great film, if it was a bit evangelical.
Well much like Sixth Sense, i'll have to re-watch it to pick up on all the little nuances.

Looking forward to a second showing, though this time I'll watch it on the big telly instead of on my iPhone...

SC7

1,882 posts

212 months

Wednesday 7th December 2011
quotequote all
He was blind.

However (and this may sound daft) I don't think it was made obvious enough.

I can see why some people wouldn't be sure.

Agoogy

7,274 posts

279 months

Wednesday 7th December 2011
quotequote all
Saw this athe cinema whenit was released and thought it was toss....

I'm clearly going to have to re-visit it...

Beefmeister

Original Poster:

16,482 posts

261 months

Wednesday 7th December 2011
quotequote all
SC7 said:
He was blind.

However (and this may sound daft) I don't think it was made obvious enough.

I can see why some people wouldn't be sure.
Yeah, in my defence i watched it over a few 40 min sections on my iPhone so may have missed a fair bit... hehe

anonymous-user

85 months

Wednesday 7th December 2011
quotequote all
When I first saw it I didn't see the twist coming. I watched it again a couple of weeks later, and was looking for clues to the twist.

It was over a year ago when I last watched it, but....

There are a couple of times when he bumps into things, and its also noticeable when he kills the cat at the start (doesn't shoot until it makes a noise) - same with the shoot out in the village, he only shoots at people once they fire at him.

If you watch it with the twist in mind, it is made quiet obvious - but you just don't pick up on things the first time.

FellowPazzini

4,483 posts

202 months

Wednesday 7th December 2011
quotequote all
SC7 said:
He was blind.

However (and this may sound daft) I don't think it was made obvious enough.

I can see why some people wouldn't be sure.
Surely I couldn't have been blind (& dumb) enough to miss that yikes (which I obviously am lol). Good film just made better.

Daniel1

2,931 posts

229 months

Wednesday 7th December 2011
quotequote all
Nyphur said:
When I first saw it I didn't see the twist coming. I watched it again a couple of weeks later, and was looking for clues to the twist.

It was over a year ago when I last watched it, but....

There are a couple of times when he bumps into things, and its also noticeable when he kills the cat at the start (doesn't shoot until it makes a noise) - same with the shoot out in the village, he only shoots at people once they fire at him.

If you watch it with the twist in mind, it is made quiet obvious - but you just don't pick up on things the first time.
+1 i like it when a film does that. Obvious one i can think of is fight club

TheEnd

15,370 posts

219 months

Wednesday 7th December 2011
quotequote all
The twist makes you want to watch it twice, looking for flaws, but it is pretty water tight.

Daniel1

2,931 posts

229 months

Wednesday 7th December 2011
quotequote all
Bedazzled said:
I enjoyed the movie; the old couple with the shakes gave me the creeps! I think a more interesting question is whether a Bible would wield that sort of power in a post-apocalyptic world...?
It already wields that power in this pre-apocalyptic world