Did Nissan HQ not know about the Juke-R?
That's the rumour... but the truth is otherwise

Which, given the massive marketing push behind the challenging-looking crossover with the innards of the mighty R35 GT-R, we found extremely odd. Cue a spot of interrogation of Nissan UK high-ups.
And it seems that there is a grain of truth (albeit a small one) in story progenitor Autoblog's original article.
"The Juke R is a Nissan Europe project that's been undertaken with the full backing of management in Japan," A senior Nissan source told us. Apparently there is one person who's not fully behind the project, however, and that's Kazutoshi Mizuno, the 'father of the GT-R'.
Then again, Mizuno-san is famously protective of his baby, and we're sure that to him turning the GT-R into the Juke-R is akin to someone painting a clown face on the Mona Lisa...
But there is one thing we want to take the fine folks at Autoblog to task on: calling the folks at Cranfield (who started the project) and RML (who have taken it on subsequently) 'a bunch of rag-tag engineers'. These are the people responsible for engineering the Qashqai and Juke and, in the case of RML, running successful WTCC, BTCC and Le Mans campaigns. The cheek of it...

It may not be tastefull to some and yourself it seems but its not a turd, its far from it.
I can not get over such ignorance that PH breeds. f
king drive's me mad.It may not be tastefull to some and yourself it seems but its not a turd, its far from it.
I can not get over such ignorance that PH breeds. f
king drive's me mad.

Actually - and Garlick will confirm this - I got all angry about Autoblog impugning the reputation of the motorsport engineers of This Sceptr'd Isle without any prompting from Nissan

It may not be tastefull to some and yourself it seems but its not a turd, its far from it.
I can not get over such ignorance that PH breeds. f
king drive's me mad.Wind you neck back in. This is a discussion forum, not an 'Everyone must agree with your opinion forum'.
Would you like me to break down my opinion of why something is visually unappealing to me? If so, for a start, look at the amount of bodywork which is simply form over function (for a start the rippled pudgy side skirts).
Just because it is fast, doesn't mean it is pretty.
It may not be tastefull to some and yourself it seems but its not a turd, its far from it.
I can not get over such ignorance that PH breeds. f
king drive's me mad.
t off a shovel 
It may not be tastefull to some and yourself it seems but its not a turd, its far from it.
I can not get over such ignorance that PH breeds. f
king drive's me mad.Wind you neck back in. This is a discussion forum, not an 'Everyone must agree with your opinion forum'.
Would you like me to break down my opinion of why something is visually unappealing to me? If so, for a start, look at the amount of bodywork which is simply form over function (for a start the rippled pudgy side skirts).
Just because it is fast, doesn't mean it is pretty.
Aesthetics are such a personal thing that you just need to respect that other people's opinions are different to yours and leave it at that. Suggesting it is "ignorance" is quite ironic I think.
I'm personally a bit sick of the 'it's different so it's automatically good' argument and the morally superior mentality that appears to go with it that keeps getting trotted out on here lately.

I'm in the "quite like the Juke" school. At least it's DIFFERENT not just a tick all the salesman's boxes type design (yes, I'm looking at you Germans now)! Well done Nissan.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff












