Now THIS is a car rig.
Author
Discussion

crmcatee

Original Poster:

5,805 posts

256 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
Hate to think how much that costs..


Audi R8, in NZ

AB

20,469 posts

224 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
Pretty impressive!

mrdelmonti

1,420 posts

210 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
What a fantastic bit of kit!

MartinP

1,275 posts

267 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
So who's going to be the first PH'er to make a car rig from glass....?

GFWilliams

4,949 posts

236 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
For the amount of time and budget he had I don't think the photos are that great.

_dobbo_

14,619 posts

277 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
It's called a "move and shoot" rig - have to say I've seen it done better with the same kit - this springs to mind:

http://www.harniman.com/#/automotive/41


Adz The Rat

18,859 posts

238 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
Very impressive setup but that must take some carting about.

Robbie B

7,715 posts

212 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
GFWilliams said:
For the amount of time and budget he had I don't think the photos are that great.
I agree. I think the tunnel was a pretty bland thing to do, especially in New Zealand of all places! I do, however, wish to reach the level of PP ability that his guy in Seattle has.

GFWilliams

4,949 posts

236 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
Adz The Rat said:
Very impressive setup but that must take some carting about.
They require a van to carry it about. I know someone in Germany with one.

Robbie B said:
I agree. I think the tunnel was a pretty bland thing to do, especially in New Zealand of all places! I do, however, wish to reach the level of PP ability that his guy in Seattle has.
I haven't seen his other work, but I've got to say, it's all really basic stuff that was done on those shots. Even I could have done it tbh.

These are the best 'rig' shots I've seen in a little while. Completely different level of processing (and photography really)







Robbie B

7,715 posts

212 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
GFWilliams said:
That's a rig shot?! What did they attach a cherry picker to the bonnet? hehe

_dobbo_

14,619 posts

277 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
GFWilliams said:
I haven't seen his other work, but I've got to say, it's all really basic stuff that was done on those shots. Even I could have done it tbh.

These are the best 'rig' shots I've seen in a little while. Completely different level of processing (and photography really)




It's funny you see because I couldn't agree less - these look like bad renderings from an X-Box game to me!

anonymous-user

83 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
How is that rig physically attached to the car to handle a rig so big? I'm assuming it's not big suckers wobble

GFWilliams

4,949 posts

236 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
garyhun said:
How is that rig physically attached to the car to handle a rig so big? I'm assuming it's not big suckers wobble
Underneath the car. I'm not sure of specifics.

GFWilliams

4,949 posts

236 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
_dobbo_ said:
It's funny you see because I couldn't agree less - these look like bad renderings from an X-Box game to me!
See I like that style. I think it's just about real enough to look real, but wacky enough to be incredible. I'm sure that if it were blown up big it would just be incredibly good

4Lmike

1,910 posts

199 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
garyhun said:
How is that rig physically attached to the car to handle a rig so big? I'm assuming it's not big suckers wobble
bolted to the chassis....im assuming

david_b

413 posts

272 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
GFWilliams said:


I can't get past the fact that it looks like the cars are suffering from terminal understeer in both shots...

AndWhyNot

2,359 posts

228 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
I like the R8 shots. Nothing outrageous but oh-so clean. The only remarkable thing about the PP is that someone else did it, if he'd done it himself it'd just be accepted as part n parcel of the image build.

_dobbo_ said:
It's called a "move and shoot" rig - have to say I've seen it done better with the same kit - this springs to mind:

http://www.harniman.com/#/automotive/41
Exactly the shot I was expecting to see when I noticed you'd linked to Nigel Harniman.

GFWilliams

4,949 posts

236 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
david_b said:
I can't get past the fact that it looks like the cars are suffering from terminal understeer in both shots...
They're muscle cars hehe

paul911

2,771 posts

262 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
R8 pic - Would it not have been cheaper and simpler to have taken a static shot and applied a motion blur in PhotoShop? wobble

_dobbo_

14,619 posts

277 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
GFWilliams said:
_dobbo_ said:
It's funny you see because I couldn't agree less - these look like bad renderings from an X-Box game to me!
See I like that style. I think it's just about real enough to look real, but wacky enough to be incredible. I'm sure that if it were blown up big it would just be incredibly good
You're almost certainly right - 700px doesn't really do any photo justice, although is useful for hiding a multitude of sins on a bad photo!

For me the inconsistent light sources on these, plus the heavily processed backgrounds take away from what should be amazing shots with less processing. We can't all like the same thing though eh?

Fundamentally I think these really long rigs lose all the impact of a rig shot - might as well do car to car and save masses of time and money!

smile