Why don't new cars have spats?
Why don't new cars have spats?
Author
Discussion

Gizmo!

Original Poster:

18,150 posts

238 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
I've been thinking. With all the hoohah about increasing economy leading to low rolling resistance tyres, stop/go engines, eco modes and suchlike, why don't new cars have spats over the rear (or even front, but that's more difficult) wheels to reduce turbulence?









See? Cooler than a polar bear's pole.

Patrick Bateman

13,160 posts

203 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
Cause they look fking awful.

y2blade

56,318 posts

244 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
Gizmo! said:
I've been thinking. .
oh dear!


Codswallop

5,258 posts

223 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
Good question. The original Insight had them;



What with designers desperate to make hippy mobiles look futuristic and what not, I would have thought spats would have been more popular on economy minded cars, especially given the air flow benefits.

Gizmo!

Original Poster:

18,150 posts

238 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
Patrick Bateman said:
Cause they look fking awful.
Look up.

Look down.

You're back in the room.

I'm on a horse.

You're wrong.

wink

Perd Hapley

1,750 posts

202 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
First Honda Insight did. But I think everyone's tried to make their Hybrids look as conventional as possible so that probably did it for Spats.

Vocal Minority

8,582 posts

181 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
For the same reason shoes don't any more?

In all seriousness, I see your point on the basis or aerodynamic efficiency (I believe the original insight had them*). But I guess something means its not worth their while.

I can imagine that someone in a design team somewhere has played with the idea and discarded it again

  • missed the boat rather here....
Edited by Vocal Minority on Wednesday 14th December 13:23

Buff Mchugelarge

3,316 posts

179 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
The Crack Fox said:
Chick in the second pic looks scared of the Citroen.
I think it was that year, could've been the later ones, but they were known to eat women.

Nick3point2

3,920 posts

209 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
There's not a huge benefit on cars with enclosed wheels (as in within the wheel arch vs open wheeled) so its probably just that people wouldn't buy a car that looked like that.

IMO they look horrfically dated, not futuristic. A bit like the robots on TV in the 70s that would be doing all our household work for us by the turn of the century.

Hugo a Gogo

23,437 posts

262 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
Honda Insight has them, not new I know but new-ish edit: bang up to date eh!

I was thinking, wouldn't enclosed lower bodywork and covered rear wheels be good on trucks in cities, maybe prevent people/cyclists going under the rear wheels?

anonymous-user

83 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
They look fine on the right car, but which modern car would they look good on?

Get photoshopping Gizmo, and give us an idea of what's inside that mind of yours wink

browno

529 posts

263 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
Not that I'm in any way experienced to comment, but could it be a balance between extra cost/weight of the spat vs aero benefit vs other things we haven't thought of like reduced airflow to cool brakes?

J4CKO

46,824 posts

229 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
Imagine your average punter seeing spats, bad juju, not want !

groomi

9,331 posts

272 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
I love cars with spats, but they're from a bygone era. These days car manufacturers want the wheels at each corner for handling and packaging reasons. Not to mention the trend for ever wider wheels meaning you'd soon end up with a single steamroller spindle across the back.

Anyway, gratuitous spats picture:

5lab

1,914 posts

225 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
on a slightly related note, citroens from time gone by always have the rear axle 'way out there' behind the passenger compartment (the wheels don't cut into the doors at all). why isn't that done any more?

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

275 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
5lab said:
on a slightly related note, citroens from time gone by always have the rear axle 'way out there' behind the passenger compartment (the wheels don't cut into the doors at all). why isn't that done any more?
Good question. Was it because they were front wheel drive and so could have the rear wheels waaaay back without a long, heavy prop-shaft or a big differential sticking up into the boot?

SWoll

22,799 posts

287 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
1) Restricted brake cooling?
2) Pain in the arse when changing a wheel/tyre?
3) Pain in the arse when cleaning your wheels/tyres?
4) They look bloody awful?

I'm sure I remember Brabus adding them on one of their recent super quick E-class models.

Checked - Brabus EV12



hurl

Gizmo!

Original Poster:

18,150 posts

238 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
yellowbentines said:
They look fine on the right car, but which modern car would they look good on?

Get photoshopping Gizmo, and give us an idea of what's inside that mind of yours wink
I was thinking about the E92 BMW actually...

Quick and dirty, but you get the idea:

Monty Python

4,813 posts

226 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
Think - it means the manufacturer can't sell you a set of ridiculously massive alloy wheels, and even then you'll only really be able to see two of them.

VR6 Turbo

2,716 posts

183 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
J4CKO said:
Imagine your average punter seeing spats, bad juju, not want !
biglaughlaugh