Audi A4 1.8t 190 feels really slow
Audi A4 1.8t 190 feels really slow
Author
Discussion

speedmachine

Original Poster:

366 posts

229 months

Friday 16th December 2011
quotequote all
Hi,
Had my B6 Audi A4 1.8t Avant for about 2 months now. It had an issue where it was sometimes difficult to get into reverse so I had the clutch and dual mass flywheel replaced and it seems to have solved the problem. Nowm I really like the car in terms of looks and comfort (its an S-line avant model) but starting to get annoyed with how slow it feels. It's the 190bhp model so I thought it would be reasonbly swift but I'm pretty sure my old St Tdci (155bhp) felt much quicker.

A comparison of the figures between a ST Tdci and the Audi shows that 0-60 times of the Mondeo is only marginally slower and it has quite a lot more torque than the Audi so I guess that explains the difference in the way they feel.

Anyone else here drive somethine with the Vag 1.8t engine and find it a bit guttless? I've been in a Leon Cupra R before which I think has the same engine but a bigger turbo and 225 bhp. That felt pretty quick.

I wonder if there is something wrong with mine or it's just me coming from a background of turbo diesels.

Ramble over!

Cupramax

10,904 posts

274 months

Friday 16th December 2011
quotequote all
Are you sure its a 190 and not a 163?.... There should be a sticker in the wheel well with the power output in KW's.

Also there's no point comparing with a Leon Cupra R, its got more power and is about 150kg lighter (200 or more if yours is a quattro).

kambites

70,493 posts

243 months

Friday 16th December 2011
quotequote all
The Crack Fox said:
Torque. You're missing the torque. That's why it feels slower.
Or to put it another way - use the gearbox you lazy git. silly

Mastodon2

14,145 posts

187 months

Friday 16th December 2011
quotequote all
I had a Cupra R 225 remapped to about 270bhp with supporting modifications, that was a fast car. Can't imagine that big heavy Audi with 190bhp is up to much though, and remapping and modifying it to go quicker with so much car to lug around will just place a lot of stress on the engine, suspension, brakes, tyres etc.

Classic Grad 98

26,048 posts

182 months

Friday 16th December 2011
quotequote all
You're going to have to get used to using the top end of the engine... peak power is probably between 5 and 6k RPM

speedmachine

Original Poster:

366 posts

229 months

Friday 16th December 2011
quotequote all
Cupramax said:
Are you sure its a 190 and not a 163?.... There should be a sticker in the wheel well with the power output in KW's.

Also there's no point comparing with a Leon Cupra R, its got more power and is about 150kg lighter.
Yes defo 190bhp model. Agree that a comparison with the cupra R is not valid. It's just that I didn't expect it to be as slow as it is. Tempted by a remap but might see if I can find someone else with a 190bhp model to compare first.

Rawwr

22,722 posts

256 months

Friday 16th December 2011
quotequote all
The only reply to this should be; "It is."

TypeRTom

520 posts

179 months

Friday 16th December 2011
quotequote all
My Octavia VRS feels quick enough (1.8T 180bhp). The diesels seem to give a huge lump of torque about 2k rpm but the 1.8T seems smoother and keeps pulling. I don't find the need to use a lot of revs to make good progress though, but then most of my previous cars have been N/A Japanese revvy things.

According to wisebuyers.co.uk the only 1.8T s-line model is a 190, but there are sport models with 163bhp. I would check the sticker in the boot as already mentioned.

speedmachine

Original Poster:

366 posts

229 months

Friday 16th December 2011
quotequote all
Classic Grad 98 said:
You're going to have to get used to using the top end of the engine... peak power is probably between 5 and 6k RPM
Coming from turbo diesels that is gonna be something very counter intuitive for me!

Pentoman

4,834 posts

285 months

Friday 16th December 2011
quotequote all
I've driven two Leon 1.8T 180s and they both felt lazy, with no fireworks. Leon is lighter than an A4.
TT 225bhp on the other hand - really great performance.
Why not get on a rolling road day -35 quid or so to see a full curve. Will be interesting, and other cars there to compare to.

speedmachine

Original Poster:

366 posts

229 months

Friday 16th December 2011
quotequote all
TypeRTom said:
My Octavia VRS feels quick enough (1.8T 180bhp). The diesels seem to give a huge lump of torque about 2k rpm but the 1.8T seems smoother and keeps pulling. I don't find the need to use a lot of revs to make good progress though, but then most of my previous cars have been N/A Japanese revvy things.

According to wisebuyers.co.uk the only 1.8T s-line model is a 190, but there are sport models with 163bhp. I would check the sticker in the boot as already mentioned.
Yup, it's defo an S-line and defo a 190bhp (unless someone has swapped the engine!). I guess being used to the low down torque of diseles I've been driving everywhere changing gears at 2500 revs! I need to tell my self that revvin it to 4000k is not thrashing it! Or accept that it was always boguth with the intention of being a comfortable family car.

jbi

12,697 posts

226 months

Friday 16th December 2011
quotequote all
that's because it IS really slow

Lund

1,743 posts

232 months

Friday 16th December 2011
quotequote all
apt username OP hehe

5lab

1,806 posts

218 months

Friday 16th December 2011
quotequote all
speedmachine said:
TypeRTom said:
My Octavia VRS feels quick enough (1.8T 180bhp). The diesels seem to give a huge lump of torque about 2k rpm but the 1.8T seems smoother and keeps pulling. I don't find the need to use a lot of revs to make good progress though, but then most of my previous cars have been N/A Japanese revvy things.

According to wisebuyers.co.uk the only 1.8T s-line model is a 190, but there are sport models with 163bhp. I would check the sticker in the boot as already mentioned.
Yup, it's defo an S-line and defo a 190bhp (unless someone has swapped the engine!). I guess being used to the low down torque of diseles I've been driving everywhere changing gears at 2500 revs! I need to tell my self that revvin it to 4000k is not thrashing it! Or accept that it was always boguth with the intention of being a comfortable family car.
isn't the redline about 7,000rpm on these engines? If you're changing at 4,000 rpm you're missing out on around 40% of the available power

bobbylondonuk

2,204 posts

212 months

Friday 16th December 2011
quotequote all
I had a 97 A6 1.8t for 3 yrs....Brilliant car 163bhp manual. It used to shift well...use the gearbox!

kambites

70,493 posts

243 months

Friday 16th December 2011
quotequote all
If you're always changing up at 2500rpm, you'll never have had more than 70bhp from the engine. A 70bhp A4 really is a slow car.

The 2.0T in our Octavia feels pretty swift once you get above the boost threshold and past the turbo-lag.

Edited by kambites on Friday 16th December 10:43

speedmachine

Original Poster:

366 posts

229 months

Friday 16th December 2011
quotequote all
kambites said:
If you're always changing up at 2500rpm, you'll never have had more than 70bhp from the engine. A 70bhp A4 really is a slow car.

The 2.0T in our Octavia feels pretty swift once you get above the boost threshold and past the turbo-lag.

Edited by kambites on Friday 16th December 10:43
I guess I just need to get used to driving a petrol car properly and not like a diesel lol

J4CKO

45,655 posts

222 months

Friday 16th December 2011
quotequote all
Heavy, refined, not that powerful (versus weight) with loads of electronics like a DBW throttle and probably a massive, heavy dual mass flywheel. To be fair it probably is reasonably quick but not being a sports model its tuned for smooth, torquey power deliver for brisk performance rather than fast, they have fast models, good news is that a remap will most likely wake it up, my 210 bhp Saab 9-2 didnt feel that much quicke rthan my old 150 lpt but a remap gave it an edge it didnt have before.

Think what you want is some old school, raw turbo action, nowadays they do ricks like limiting boost in the lower gears to preserve the drivetrain and avoid waranty claims but personally, I like to decide on whether I want to leave cogs on the road.

angusc43

13,221 posts

230 months

Friday 16th December 2011
quotequote all
speedmachine said:
I guess being used to the low down torque of diseles I've been driving everywhere changing gears at 2500 revs! I need to tell my self that revvin it to 4000k is not thrashing it!
It's a petrol engine. It thrives on revs. Use them!


rb5er

11,657 posts

194 months

Friday 16th December 2011
quotequote all
Revving to 4k revs??? You should be revving it to more like 6k revs to get the most out of it.