Changes to Sorn on the way
Discussion
Some good news for a change
http://www.dft.gov.uk/news/press-releases/dft-pres...
Some common sense being shown at last.
http://www.dft.gov.uk/news/press-releases/dft-pres...
Some common sense being shown at last.
With ANPR in use in all forces in the UK, why do we need SORN anyway?
They could save a big chunk of wedge by scrapping it, and spending the cash saved on more ANPR to catch the scrotes who drive without tax/insurance/licence - with a simple penalty - immediate seizure and destruction - occupants may alight from the vehicle, but that's it. So if you've got our shopping/work tools etc in the car, tough luck, in the fragmenting machine it goes!
They could save a big chunk of wedge by scrapping it, and spending the cash saved on more ANPR to catch the scrotes who drive without tax/insurance/licence - with a simple penalty - immediate seizure and destruction - occupants may alight from the vehicle, but that's it. So if you've got our shopping/work tools etc in the car, tough luck, in the fragmenting machine it goes!
thunderbelmont said:
With ANPR in use in all forces in the UK, why do we need SORN anyway?
They could save a big chunk of wedge by scrapping it, and spending the cash saved on more ANPR to catch the scrotes who drive without tax/insurance/licence - with a simple penalty - immediate seizure and destruction - occupants may alight from the vehicle, but that's it. So if you've got our shopping/work tools etc in the car, tough luck, in the fragmenting machine it goes!
+ 1. Well said.They could save a big chunk of wedge by scrapping it, and spending the cash saved on more ANPR to catch the scrotes who drive without tax/insurance/licence - with a simple penalty - immediate seizure and destruction - occupants may alight from the vehicle, but that's it. So if you've got our shopping/work tools etc in the car, tough luck, in the fragmenting machine it goes!
Rather than seizure and destruction, DVLA should then have the authority to re-register the cars to themselves as they see fit and sell in auction or via agents to auction. This then provides an added financial incentive for the government, reducing the tax burden, and make people think twice about not insuring or taxing.
leef44 said:
Rather than seizure and destruction, DVLA should then have the authority to re-register the cars to themselves as they see fit and sell in auction or via agents to auction. This then provides an added financial incentive for the government, reducing the tax burden, and make people think twice about not insuring or taxing.
I like that, but probably not workable.Mermaid said:
leef44 said:
Rather than seizure and destruction, DVLA should then have the authority to re-register the cars to themselves as they see fit and sell in auction or via agents to auction. This then provides an added financial incentive for the government, reducing the tax burden, and make people think twice about not insuring or taxing.
I like that, but probably not workable.Incentive is the coppers keep the money, so are rather encouraged to get uninsured vehicles off the road.
If this lot also want to cut-out a tax, then the road fund licence should be first as it never gets spent on the roads!
Gassing Station | Motoring News | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff