W2003 Standard or W2003 Web Edition?
W2003 Standard or W2003 Web Edition?
Author
Discussion

PetrolTed

Original Poster:

34,465 posts

327 months

Wednesday 30th June 2004
quotequote all
I'm speccing the new PH servers and need to decide between Standard edition 2004 or Web edition.

Web edition looks like the one to go for except:

MS said:

Organizations cannot use Windows Server 2003, Web Edition, to deploy enterprise Universal Description, Discovery, and Integration (UDDI) services. UDDI is an essential component for enabling discovery and reuse of XML Web services.


Am I likely to need UDDI stuff? I don't fully understand it yet but I'd need to be providing some fairly fancy services to need that level of complexity wouldn't I?

Podie

46,649 posts

299 months

Wednesday 30th June 2004
quotequote all
The web edition is for general hosting / web serving... not sure if by "organisation" MS mean large coproate LAN's with several servers, rather than a single server...

I'll ask one of our MSCE's tomorrow...

danhf

349 posts

280 months

Wednesday 30th June 2004
quotequote all
Have two svrs with std and t'others with web.



dan

JamieBeeston

9,294 posts

289 months

Wednesday 30th June 2004
quotequote all
Web = No MSSQL

We tend to stick Web on as stock, those who need MSSQL upgrade to Standard / 2000

Will say, make sure its firewalled and locked down, most 2003 boxes I know of have been rooted at least once so far.

Podie

46,649 posts

299 months

Wednesday 30th June 2004
quotequote all
JamieBeeston said:
Will say, make sure its firewalled and locked down, most 2003 boxes I know of have been rooted at least once so far.


Agreed... even though it is better than its predecessors...

PetrolTed

Original Poster:

34,465 posts

327 months

Wednesday 30th June 2004
quotequote all
But am I likely to need UDDI?

anonymous-user

78 months

Thursday 1st July 2004
quotequote all
Are you expecting to want to publish SOAP web services for general consumption? Or is it more likely that you'll just be using (if at all) for internal use or with a small number of partners?

If it's the latter then you don't need UDDI AFAIK.

To learn more about UDDI, take a look at the UDDI website or one of the [url]registries|http://uddi.sap.com/[/url]

Edited to add: I've just thought, even if you are going to offer your web services to the world at large, there are loads of UDDI registries out there you could publish your service to anyway, so I'd say no, you don't need UDDI services on your servers.

>> Edited by anonymous-user on Thursday 1st July 10:18

PetrolTed

Original Poster:

34,465 posts

327 months

Thursday 1st July 2004
quotequote all
Thanks. Might provide a few services but not on a grand scale so I think I'll go for the web edition. Thanks for your help.

NoelWatson

11,710 posts

266 months

Thursday 1st July 2004
quotequote all
PetrolTed,

I think you will be OK with web edition. The only limitations are

1. 10 in-bound server message block (SMB) connections www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/evaluation/overview/web.mspx

This is not a problem if you are using anonymous authentication as you are at present.

2. Limited to 2 processors per box


SQL Server does not come with Windows 2003 - it's a separate install

JamieBeeston

9,294 posts

289 months

Thursday 1st July 2004
quotequote all
NoelWatson said:
SQL Server does not come with Windows 2003 - it's a separate install


Goes without saying, but it will not install on 2003 WE. M$ Refuse to let it.

MySQL goes on.. just not MSSQL.

There is also a RAM limit, but its trivial.

WE is a nice 'lite' OS.

plotloss

67,280 posts

294 months

Thursday 1st July 2004
quotequote all
Bit misleading that.

To deploy web services you dont strictly need UDDI.

Its just a yellow pages...

NoelWatson

11,710 posts

266 months

Thursday 1st July 2004
quotequote all
JamieBeeston,

Thanks for that info, wasn't aware that MS had that restriction in place.

danhf

349 posts

280 months

Sunday 4th July 2004
quotequote all
NoelWatson said:
JamieBeeston,

Thanks for that info, wasn't aware that MS had that restriction in place.


Nor was I - are you sure it's true Jamie? I'm 90% sure have a dev server running win2k3 with MS SQL on it but I'll confirm on Monday.

dan

JamieBeeston

9,294 posts

289 months

Sunday 4th July 2004
quotequote all
danhf said:

Nor was I - are you sure it's true Jamie? I'm 90% sure have a dev server running win2k3 with MS SQL on it but I'll confirm on Monday.

dan


http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;819258

Microsoft Website said:


SYMPTOMS
When you install Microsoft SQL Server 2000 on a computer that is running Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Web Edition, the SQL Server Setup program may not run successfully. Additionally, you may receive the following error message:

Windows cannot open this program since it has been disabled.


MORE INFORMATION
Windows Server 2003 Web Edition is designed to build and to host Web-based applications and Web services. Because of this, Windows Server 2003 Web Edition does not support enterprise applications, including SQL Server 2000. Therefore, when you install any enterprise applications, you must configure your computer to run Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition.