the next level ...
the next level ...
Author
Discussion

gerjo

Original Poster:

1,627 posts

311 months

Friday 2nd July 2004
quotequote all
What's the next level in performance upgrade after the popular mods (ACT plenum, large airflow, P404, Mark's chip)?
What does one need to do to reach 350 real bhp with a 5 liter (without changing the engine)?

johno

8,593 posts

311 months

Friday 2nd July 2004
quotequote all
Blower ??

gerjo

Original Poster:

1,627 posts

311 months

Friday 2nd July 2004
quotequote all
I was thinking of something a little less drastic. With the current mods it should put out around 300-320 bhp. So I'm looking for say another 30 bhp.

Other heads?
Mapped ignition?
Seperate injectors/coils?

Horse_Apple

3,795 posts

271 months

Friday 2nd July 2004
quotequote all
I suspect that once you have optimized the air and fuel going in and the spark then you have to start looking at the head.

The cheapest way to get any car to go faster is to put better breaks on it.

Nano2nd

3,426 posts

285 months

Friday 2nd July 2004
quotequote all
Horse_Apple said:
I suspect that once you have optimized the air and fuel going in and the spark then you have to start looking at the head.

The cheapest way to get any car to go faster is to put better breaks on it.


not if your using it for drag racing

gerjo

Original Poster:

1,627 posts

311 months

Friday 2nd July 2004
quotequote all
already have the right brakes (4 pot 310 mm front)

900T-R

20,406 posts

286 months

Friday 2nd July 2004
quotequote all
Horse_Apple said:


The cheapest way to get any car to go faster is to put better breaks on it.


Oh, gimme a brake!

old64er

1,388 posts

267 months

Friday 2nd July 2004
quotequote all
Speak to Trev at Highpower Nitrous Oxide and get 50/100 on the switch.( no connection just seen his efforts at Long Marsden 1/4 mile)
He ran a mk1 escort with RV8 to 1000bhp in the early nineties.
that should be plenty
Just a thought !!

Nano2nd

3,426 posts

285 months

Friday 2nd July 2004
quotequote all
old64er said:
Speak to Trev at Highpower Nitrous Oxide and get 50/100 on the switch.( no connection just seen his efforts at Long Marsden 1/4 mile)
He ran a mk1 escort with RV8 to 1000bhp in the early nineties.
that should be plenty
Just a thought !!


its the damn insurance thats the problem! like err.. no one does it!

agreed though pound for pound there nothing better, i've spoke to trev about this and he says ypu could run 200bhp extra no problem

BogBeast

1,144 posts

292 months

Friday 2nd July 2004
quotequote all
At this point SHPUB usually points ou that limitations of the drivetrain..

My understanding is that pretty much everything behind the crankshaft has to be considered a consumable unless you want to consider costly re-engineering..

Marlon

735 posts

287 months

Friday 2nd July 2004
quotequote all
My understanding is that mapped ignition will not significantly increase BHP, but should deliver a big (c. 30 lb/ft) increase in torque.

Considering it myself...

RichB

56,216 posts

313 months

Friday 2nd July 2004
quotequote all
I believe this is what the Marcos T500 uses? Rich...

shpub

8,507 posts

301 months

Friday 2nd July 2004
quotequote all
The main advantage of mapped ignition is that it allows you to start taking advantage of more esoteric engine bits (i.e. expensive)so that you can prevent the engine from self detonating. It can retard/advance the ignition as conditions allow and thus allow some pretty high CRs to run for a start.

BTW the Heath second law of engine upgrading says that the more you upgrade, the threshold of what you consider a reasonable cost doubles with every additional horsepower.



Nano2nd

3,426 posts

285 months

Friday 2nd July 2004
quotequote all
well the T5 is good for 400bhp and the diffs are fairly bullet proof. i would wager the clutch is the weakest link.

However if using a computer controlled delivery system for the n02 then transmission stresses are reduced.

obviously nothing lasts forever (including the n02 lol) but if you wanna go faster you take the rough with the smooth. Plus its not as if you can't get uprated gearbox/clutch/diffs etc

Nano2nd

3,426 posts

285 months

Friday 2nd July 2004
quotequote all
Marlon said:
My understanding is that mapped ignition will not significantly increase BHP, but should deliver a big (c. 30 lb/ft) increase in torque.

Considering it myself...


this is something i like the sound of and its not silly expensive and reversable if required! an suitable omex system is available for £350ish and then just the fitting and mapping to add. and possibly the price of a MAP sensor although these can be had cheap

Horse_Apple

3,795 posts

271 months

Friday 2nd July 2004
quotequote all
Nano2nd said:

Horse_Apple said:
I suspect that once you have optimized the air and fuel going in and the spark then you have to start looking at the head.

The cheapest way to get any car to go faster is to put better breaks on it.



not if your using it for drag racing


True. But you do need to be able to hang your mum's best table cloth out the back to slow it down.

starmist

1,052 posts

271 months

Friday 2nd July 2004
quotequote all
Myself, (and according to Mark Adams, quite a few other people) are at a similar point with their engines.

I have had a TVR Power upgrade Taraka cam with solid lifters, ACT triple 50mm throttle bodied carbon plenum with air box, Bosch air flow meter, Mark Adams Tornado chip, rolling road set up and ACT silicone air filter to AF pipe.

This is giving 253 on Mech repairs dyno, which according to Mark equates to around 315 on Power Engineering / Austec / V8D dynos.

But, the injectors are limiting power, as they are already on maximum duration with a squeezed (42psi instead of 36psi) fuel regulator. The cam wants more advance but we can't get any more fuel in to take advantage so it will pink. The next step is to fit Bosch injectors from a Maserati of some description, which allow 20% more fuel. With these fitted, the fuel reg. can be backed off again (as you get a better spray pattern with less pressure) and the cam can be advanced to take advantage.

Mark reckons about another 15 - 20 ponies.

At the ame time, I am having the pre-cats removed from the manifolds and reverse cones fitted (dropped them off yesterday) and them and the Y piece ceramic coated (more for cosmetics, but because it retains the heat in the exhaust, you get lower under bonnet temperatures, meaning your intake air doesn't heat up as much, so it's denser, which means you can add more fuel, giving more power).

All this should add another 5bhp or so, so once it's been set up by Mark again, we should be looking at around 340 odd.

You may find that your twin plenum does not flow enough air for bigger injectors to take advantage, but it is definitely worth fitting the ACT silicone air filter to AFM hose (it's smooth and doesn't soak heat as much) and playing around with the ignition timing to see if you can advance it any more without pinking. If you have the later ACT pkenum, which leaves the AFM in the same place as standard, the pipe will fit well, but if it's an early one, which is offset, you might have to bugger around a bit.

Hope this helps, but email me off line if you want to discuss further.

gerjo

Original Poster:

1,627 posts

311 months

Friday 2nd July 2004
quotequote all
Thanks for all your replies.

Starmist: sounds interesting. If indeed we can get to a 340ish level, that would suite me fine. I don't want to ruin the car and my feeling is that 340/350 bhp is about the maximum the components can handle before they start acting like consumables.
I'l have a talk with Mark, Tim and V8 Dev too.

Nice project to work on for the Winter.

starmist

1,052 posts

271 months

Friday 2nd July 2004
quotequote all
I'm hoping to get the Bosch injectors in in a couple of weeks and set up on the rr again. I have some fueling issues at the moment due to injector limitations which mean it's a bit of a pig to drive, so I'm having to do this a bit sooner than I would like.

Guillotine

5,516 posts

293 months

Friday 2nd July 2004
quotequote all
V8D run several griffs pushing 350-380 on quad carbs. don't think that these eat drive trains unless racing. could be wrong! this is cheapest 360 or so you'll get!!

anyway, i understand that the later ACT twin will push 320 or so with the big injectors (the big ones were worth 8 bhp on their own starmist!),but the triple may give a touch more torque. don't think anyone's got better than a REAL 320bhp...yet!

and finally, the omex system is a touch more expensive when installed than quoted. figure around £700 on and set (cheaper if combining with other kit), but will give silky smooth power at all revs and a VERY punchy in gear times! as most dizzy's in griff are casing probs (not very good as they are weight based and slip! causing a trade off for power at low/high revs as starmist and i both are aware ) its a good option if you can afford and you've already got a V8D cam!

will get mine later (omex that is) have just gone for the spare wheels and road slix package as Track speed is more important to me.

MMMMMMM Le mans and Dijon in 2 weeks

>> Edited by Guillotine on Friday 2nd July 18:48

>> Edited by Guillotine on Friday 2nd July 19:12