new company policy. no phonecalls whilst driving
new company policy. no phonecalls whilst driving
Author
Discussion

sa v8 mate

Original Poster:

513 posts

181 months

Monday 2nd January 2012
quotequote all
Big national company, about 8000 company vehicles, all fitted with handsfree kits. From today even taking hands free is against company policy if you're on the move. It's been decieded on the grounds of elf n safety. I spend about an hour a day making calls on the move, the managers even more. As all vehicles are fitted with the latest Trackers, and we all have company phones, it's easy to check up whether everyone's complying. It'll take some getting used to, having to pull everytime the phone rings. Any other companies have this policy ?

Watchman

6,391 posts

262 months

Monday 2nd January 2012
quotequote all
Yep, mine does but it's not enforced.

Buster73

5,410 posts

170 months

Monday 2nd January 2012
quotequote all
RBS

davepoth

29,395 posts

216 months

Monday 2nd January 2012
quotequote all
Sensible IMO - hands free isn't that much safer, and the company are covering their own backs. I guess at some point within the next 6 years (personal injury claim limit) they're expecting a law change banning hands-free calls while driving.

richtea78

5,574 posts

175 months

Monday 2nd January 2012
quotequote all
Company I work for do it to, large bank but not the one mentioned above.

We have to sign to say that we will comply with it, and some other rules, before we are allowed to drive company cars.

thinfourth2

32,414 posts

221 months

Monday 2nd January 2012
quotequote all
Who cares if they are paying by the hour

Willy Nilly

12,511 posts

184 months

Monday 2nd January 2012
quotequote all
Probably an insurance issue

vonhosen

40,596 posts

234 months

Monday 2nd January 2012
quotequote all
I'd imagine it's insurers insisting for cover. They'll be basing it on the collisions/injuries at work & the research that shows cognitive distraction is the same whether the call is hands free or hand held.

10 Pence Short

32,880 posts

234 months

Monday 2nd January 2012
quotequote all
Sounds like a good move.

XDA

2,153 posts

202 months

Monday 2nd January 2012
quotequote all
Judging by the OP's profile, it's quite clear who he works for.

Seems his employer is quite anal about H&S. No handsfree phone calls, gps tracker and vans limited to 70mph. Must be unbearable!

redtwin

7,518 posts

199 months

Monday 2nd January 2012
quotequote all
If you are the one making the calls, and the restriction is costing you, just get another personal phone on a good contract and use that one. You could also redirect incoming calls to the company phone to the personal one...unless they have a way of tracking that.

Personally, I would just do as they ask. It's their car, their phone and their money paying your salary.


Arthur Jackson

2,111 posts

247 months

Monday 2nd January 2012
quotequote all
vonhosen said:
I'd imagine it's insurers insisting for cover. They'll be basing it on the collisions/injuries at work & the research that shows cognitive distraction is the same whether the call is hands free or hand held.
That doesn't surprise me. I once looked in my mirror whilst talking hands free and saw a police car flashing me. I pulled over and he told me he'd been flashing for about a minute. Apparently as I crossed a mini-roundabout I glanced his way and he saw my mouth moving and thought I was having a go at him!! He let me go without so much as a bad word when he knew I was hands-free. I felt a bit stupid that I hadn't noticed him to be honest..

sjg

7,608 posts

282 months

Monday 2nd January 2012
quotequote all
We had a recent change of car policy (a few companies in the same group harmonising) and this was in ours too - "Employees must not make or accept any calls whilst driving". Which I'm quite happy with, I can do with some peace and quiet when travelling about.

I believe it's mostly driven by recent Corporate Manslaughter legislation, which can hold the company at least partly accountable if an employee dies in service. If someone died in a car accident, they were shown to be distracted by a call at the time, and the company did not discourage (or even encouraged, as we did - paid for bluetooth kits to be fitted, etc) talking on the phone while driving then they could be prosecuted. The law allows for pretty hefty fines - the first case went through this summer and firm was fined slightly more than their annual turnover.

kambites

69,944 posts

238 months

Monday 2nd January 2012
quotequote all
Sounds like a good idea to me. It's fairly clear that if there's anything dangerous about using a phone whilst driving, it's nothing to do with physically holding it.

martin mrt

3,870 posts

218 months

Monday 2nd January 2012
quotequote all
My old workplace started this off around 15 months ago, no PERSONAL mobile phone calls whilst operating any company vehicle, machine etc or whilst on company premises, and this included hands free, however the massive flaw in their rule was, being entirely acceptable to use a COMPANY phone in the above situation.

To me it reeked of st, I no longer work for the company, and stupid rules like the above is one of the main reasons

I personally don't see the problem with making/receiving calls on hands free devices, it's within the law, and any accident/near miss I've experienced haven't been phone related

Dog Star

17,051 posts

185 months

Monday 2nd January 2012
quotequote all
martin mrt said:
I personally don't see the problem with making/receiving calls on hands free devices, it's within the law, and any accident/near miss I've experienced haven't been phone related
If you can't chat on a hands free phone while driving (or riding) then (IMO of course) I'd question your mental capacity for driving. I'll often yak away for hours if I'm on a long trip - its a good way of catching up with people I've not spoke to in ages. I can do this, adjust controls, drink a can of coke etc and, remarkably, not die!

What next? Ban talking to passengers? Ban ICE?

People need to get a bit of perspective.

(these are just my opinions , so can the abuse, before you start)

Jakestar

436 posts

208 months

Monday 2nd January 2012
quotequote all
I work in H&S / compliance for a company that has company cars.

There are a few reasons why companies have adopted this policy;

- Studies have shown that the use of a hands free kit reduces driver concentration (on average, for the average driver etc. etc.)
- Companies want to protect themselves and their employees (both morally and financially)
- Some fleet insurance policies may require this as a prerequisite
- The introduction of the corporate manslaughter act (supposedly) makes it easier to prosecute individual directors in the event of a death related to work activity
- If a company car driver has a crash whilst taking a phone call, the company may be held liable.

Companies don't want their drivers to crash, adopting this policy has been shown to reduce accident rates.

On a personal note, I think it's a shame companies have to go to this length, common sense would dictate that if a driver felt their concentration was disrupted or likely to be disrupted, they wouldn't take the call / end the call.. and such a policy would never need to be implemented!

Whehter such a policy is really needed if a driver is driving on a deserted dual carriage way / motorway is another question..

However we all know that common sense isn't very common, and there are a lot of bad drivers out there!

Watchman

6,391 posts

262 months

Monday 2nd January 2012
quotequote all
Dog Star said:
If you can't chat on a hands free phone while driving (or riding) then (IMO of course) I'd question your mental capacity for driving. I'll often yak away for hours if I'm on a long trip - its a good way of catching up with people I've not spoke to in ages. I can do this, adjust controls, drink a can of coke etc and, remarkably, not die!

What next? Ban talking to passengers? Ban ICE?

People need to get a bit of perspective.

(these are just my opinions , so can the abuse, before you start)
I agree with this..!!

Jazoli

9,380 posts

267 months

Monday 2nd January 2012
quotequote all
Watchman said:
Dog Star said:
If you can't chat on a hands free phone while driving (or riding) then (IMO of course) I'd question your mental capacity for driving. I'll often yak away for hours if I'm on a long trip - its a good way of catching up with people I've not spoke to in ages. I can do this, adjust controls, drink a can of coke etc and, remarkably, not die!

What next? Ban talking to passengers? Ban ICE?

People need to get a bit of perspective.

(these are just my opinions , so can the abuse, before you start)
I agree with this..!!
Me too, I drive at least 1000 miles a week for work and pass the time speaking to friends, hands free

XDA said:
Seems his employer is quite anal about H&S. No handsfree phone calls, gps tracker and vans limited to 70mph. Must be unbearable!
My employer is the same, the stupid thing is is that the 70mph limiters are bloody dangerous at times as one of the options of avoiding trouble (speeding up) has been taken away, I now drive mostly at 65mph in traffic, so I guess the limiter has worked rolleyes

sa v8 mate

Original Poster:

513 posts

181 months

Monday 2nd January 2012
quotequote all
thinfourth2 said:
Who cares if they are paying by the hour
Exactly, I reckon about 4 to 5 hrs a week.