One law for them . . .
One law for them . . .
Author
Discussion

pete.g

Original Poster:

1,531 posts

237 months

S1MMA

2,451 posts

250 months

Thursday 5th January 2012
quotequote all
Nice choice of car....

anonymous-user

85 months

Thursday 5th January 2012
quotequote all
The upside is he does not look good for 49! smile

mikecassie

676 posts

190 months

Thursday 5th January 2012
quotequote all
People like him don't help with the image decent Porsche owners get. He'd 6 points already and he didn't get banned. FFS if he earns as much as they reckon he can afford a chauffeur.....

all2ofme

855 posts

219 months

Thursday 5th January 2012
quotequote all
And if he got a chauffeur it wouldn't matter if he had a PDK or a manual 'box biggrin

Actus Reus

4,312 posts

186 months

Thursday 5th January 2012
quotequote all
I actually know Marco from a few years back - he's a nice bloke when you meet him to be fair.

supermono

7,464 posts

279 months

Thursday 5th January 2012
quotequote all
Maybe this is heralding the era of sensible fines? TBH 111mph is available in the blink of an eye in these cars it's a complete non event.

There's nothing in the story about him beig dangerous despite the idiot journo citing 'fatalities' so who cares?

Just out for a drive enjoying the car safely the way we do in Germany every day and well withing its design parameters, only displaying the wrong number on the speedo.

SM

drpep

1,761 posts

199 months

Thursday 5th January 2012
quotequote all
supermono said:
Maybe this is heralding the era of sensible fines? TBH 111mph is available in the blink of an eye in these cars it's a complete non event.

There's nothing in the story about him beig dangerous despite the idiot journo citing 'fatalities' so who cares?

Just out for a drive enjoying the car safely the way we do in Germany every day and well withing its design parameters, only displaying the wrong number on the speedo.

SM
+1 although the moaners will say 'well if he can, why can't I'...

I wouldn't want to comment on 'safety' without first seeing the road and conditions. Some 30 limits are stupidly low. Some are stupidly high. I suspect the same applies here.

Zyp

16,157 posts

220 months

Thursday 5th January 2012
quotequote all
Marco Pagni......'who was born and brought up in Northern Ireland,

Ah, that great traditional Norn Irish name.
smile

khushy

3,984 posts

250 months

Thursday 5th January 2012
quotequote all
Actus Reus said:
I actually know Marco from a few years back - he's a nice bloke when you meet him to be fair.
aha - he is a nice bloke - lets let him off!

EVOeng

966 posts

201 months

Thursday 5th January 2012
quotequote all
drpep said:
supermono said:
Maybe this is heralding the era of sensible fines? TBH 111mph is available in the blink of an eye in these cars it's a complete non event.

There's nothing in the story about him beig dangerous despite the idiot journo citing 'fatalities' so who cares?

Just out for a drive enjoying the car safely the way we do in Germany every day and well withing its design parameters, only displaying the wrong number on the speedo.

SM
+1 although the moaners will say 'well if he can, why can't I'...

I wouldn't want to comment on 'safety' without first seeing the road and conditions. Some 30 limits are stupidly low. Some are stupidly high. I suspect the same applies here.
+2
111mph does seem to appear rather quickly - and on a clear motorway stretch, why not?

pete.g

Original Poster:

1,531 posts

237 months

Thursday 5th January 2012
quotequote all
supermono said:
Maybe this is heralding the era of sensible fines? TBH 111mph is available in the blink of an eye in these cars it's a complete non event.

There's nothing in the story about him beig dangerous despite the idiot journo citing 'fatalities' so who cares?

Just out for a drive enjoying the car safely the way we do in Germany every day and well withing its design parameters, only displaying the wrong number on the speedo.

SM
I don't think you can do 111 on single carriageways in Germany?

I do know the road in question - one thing would hold me back from doing three figure speeds on it - tractors.

What annoyed me was not the speed but the idea that being rich and "important" means you get away with something I would not.

He's been fined the equivalent of an hour's salary.


supermono

7,464 posts

279 months

Thursday 5th January 2012
quotequote all
pete.g said:
I don't think you can do 111 on single carriageways in Germany?

I do know the road in question - one thing would hold me back from doing three figure speeds on it - tractors.

What annoyed me was not the speed but the idea that being rich and "important" means you get away with something I would not.

He's been fined the equivalent of an hour's salary.
I imagine the judge looked at the amount of menace the bloke caused and with nothing safety related in the report one can assume his only issue was showing 111 on the speedo instead of 60.

On that basis the fine is probably alright.

I doubt the judge took into account the bloke's rich.

Hey maybe he's lurking in here to talk us that 111mph frenzy first hand smile

SM

supermono

7,464 posts

279 months

Thursday 5th January 2012
quotequote all
pete.g said:
I don't think you can do 111 on single carriageways in Germany?

I do know the road in question - one thing would hold me back from doing three figure speeds on it - tractors.

What annoyed me was not the speed but the idea that being rich and "important" means you get away with something I would not.

He's been fined the equivalent of an hour's salary.
I imagine the judge looked at the amount of menace the bloke caused and with nothing safety related in the report one can assume his only issue was showing 111 on the speedo instead of 60.

On that basis the fine is probably alright.

I doubt the judge took into account the bloke's rich.

Hey maybe he's lurking in here to talk us that 111mph frenzy first hand smile

SM

pork911

7,365 posts

214 months

Thursday 5th January 2012
quotequote all
Who's 'them' and what's the law being referred to?

Zyp

16,157 posts

220 months

Thursday 5th January 2012
quotequote all
pork911 said:
Who's 'them' and what's the law being referred to?
Evenin' Marco.


smile

Lordglenmorangie

3,071 posts

236 months

Thursday 5th January 2012
quotequote all
111mph in a GT3 fking tick over. driving

AndrewMontgomery

502 posts

226 months

Thursday 5th January 2012
quotequote all
I know his lawyer. Very capable QC. Big gun for a Magistrate's Court. You can definitely buy a better result.

Helicopter123

8,831 posts

187 months

Thursday 5th January 2012
quotequote all
Lordglenmorangie said:
111mph in a GT3 fking tick over. driving
This.

If the road is clear and the Driver is not putting anyone in danger then common sense must prevail.

Or else, we can all tootle around in a Prius and save the planet.

pete.g

Original Poster:

1,531 posts

237 months

Thursday 5th January 2012
quotequote all
pork911 said:
Who's 'them' and what's the law being referred to?
"Them" = people who can buy their way out of situations.

The law is referred to in the article - the local magistrate having said that if you get caught at 100+ you lose your licence.

I'd be fairly sure a local boy in a Subaru, which is just as capable of 3 figure speeds, would have had been banned.

My brother's ex-girlfriend got £800 and six points for 98mph coming off a dual carriageway onto single carriageway. She was doing 100+ but the copper told her he'd do her a favour because 100+ would lead to a ban. Her company did not write her a letter of support - in fact they gave her a written warning, as it was a company car.