Single occupant cars to be banned from lanes
Single occupant cars to be banned from lanes
Author
Discussion

Tafia

Original Poster:

2,658 posts

271 months

Sunday 4th July 2004
quotequote all
TV report tells us the latest "idea" to clear congestion on M.ways is to have express (HA) lanes which can only be used by cars with two or more occupants.

Drivers of single occupant vehicles using the lanes will be (surprise surprise), fined.

Looks as if sales reps are about to go around in two's or perhaps rent a passenger will take off.

Perhaps inflatable passenger makers would be a good stock to invest in.

To be trialled on the M1 and M3. No doubt it will be a great success!!!!!

Tafia

Original Poster:

2,658 posts

271 months

Sunday 4th July 2004
quotequote all

8Pack

5,182 posts

263 months

Sunday 4th July 2004
quotequote all
I think it has more to do with slowing the other two lanes down so much that: "in the Governments eyes" single occupant motorists will say "sod this" and use the non-existent "public transport" instead. Or am I just cynical (again)

can you imagine the tailbacks when 3 lanes are squeezed into two!!!!

One good thing! they won't need speed cameras then will they?

>> Edited by 8Pack on Sunday 4th July 11:44

bogush

481 posts

289 months

Sunday 4th July 2004
quotequote all
8Pack said:
I think it has more to do with slowing the other two lanes down so much that: "in the Governments eyes" single occupant motorists will say "sod this" and use the non-existent "public transport" instead. Or am I just cynical (again)

can you imagine the tailbacks when 3 lanes are squeezed into two!!!!


In Nottingham, in parallel with the construction of the new tram line to Hucknall, they improved the parallel Hucknall Road out from the ring road. I assumed that meant eliminating the few pinch points that stopped it being two lanes each way all the way. Would be easy to do as it runs past golf courses or between waste scrubland most of the way.

Nope: they put in cycle lanes and right turn lanes.

The latter feeding through tight right angles into narrowed junctions.

They'd already put bus lanes from the ring road into the junction with Mansfield Road which takes you the rest of the way into town.

They are currently "improving" Mansfield road, which will narrow it and restrict access to non public transport.

And I've just noticed that there is yellow paint all over the junction which at first looks like it's to improve the very sharp acute left turn:

They've marked up the left pavement for widening.

But they've widened the central refuge by the same amount.

Oops, and the actual kerb line comes to a sharp point instead of having some curve round it!

Then they will claim that car use has fallen.

And surprise, surprise, tram use has increased.

From zero.

At a cost of a mere Fifth of a £Billion!

ftasb

229 posts

262 months

Sunday 4th July 2004
quotequote all
Gazboy siad our transport ministers must be brain dead. You would need to have a brain for it to die.

8Pack

5,182 posts

263 months

Sunday 4th July 2004
quotequote all
Yep! 25 miles of lorries in the first lane, 35 miles of cars in the middle lane, and 6 cars with a driver + a dummy in the 3rd lane. Makes sense that doesn't it!

Yes I think the truth is they want us out of our cars by any devious means they can find. Any excuse to harass us into leaving our cars at home.

40 years ago that might have been possible! we had public transport then.

streaky

19,311 posts

272 months

Monday 5th July 2004
quotequote all
Ah, but the real point is the £100 fines they will levy (policed by scameras) from those motorists who find themselves forced into the HOV lane by the SWoT ahead! - Streaky

streaky

19,311 posts

272 months

Monday 5th July 2004
quotequote all
bogush said:
[ ... ]

In Nottingham, in parallel with the construction of the new tram line to Hucknall, they improved the parallel Hucknall Road out from the ring road. ... they put in cycle lanes and right turn lanes.
Which are obsolescent as cyclists will be allowed to ride on the footway regardless of rim/frame size. But I bet they don't remove them! - Streaky

Peter Ward

2,097 posts

279 months

Monday 5th July 2004
quotequote all
streaky said:
Which are obsolescent as cyclists will be allowed to ride on the footway regardless of rim/frame size. But I bet they don't remove them! - Streaky

When will cyclists be allowed to ride on the path? I've missed that announcement.

BTW, I think I read that the HOV lanes will be the additional ones that are being built at present. They don't plan to remove existing lanes. I still think it's ludicrous but it's not (yet) quite as bad as making 3-lane Mways into 2-lanes everywhere. In the US where HOV lanes exist they're on 6-lane Mways, not our paltry 3-lane ones. But if it works in USA it must be ok here too....

Trefor

14,717 posts

306 months

Monday 5th July 2004
quotequote all
I support HOV lanes where there are also plenty of other lanes for people to queue in. 4 lane sections of the M25 for instance. I travel to the US a lot and this works well there - people do car share.

I don't see any money being involved here - in fact if people car shar then there will be less fuel/road tax for HM Gov't. Refreshing change from the usual ideas they have.

mcflurry

9,184 posts

276 months

Monday 5th July 2004
quotequote all
Perhaps they should allow an exeption for 2 seater cars. 2 seats out of 4 shared is the same as 1 out of 2

Davel

8,982 posts

281 months

Monday 5th July 2004
quotequote all
Time to buy a blow-up doll!

Mind you the wife will never believe the excuse...

jacko lah

3,297 posts

272 months

Monday 5th July 2004
quotequote all
Davel said:
Time to buy a blow-up doll!

Mind you the wife will never believe the excuse...


When my Mum and dad went to visit my Sister in Dayton Ohio, they were standing at the BUS stop, taking a trip down town (my mum LIKES buses FFS) and a car stopped and offered them a lift. It turned out to be one of my sisters neighbours who admitted to picking anyone up, if they got to use the 2 or more lane into town. Thus saving about 3/4 of an hour.

I predict the Death of public transport, more muggings and car jacking and sales of Blow up dolls will increase.

hornet

6,333 posts

273 months

Monday 5th July 2004
quotequote all
Saw a little snippet on the news last night showing car sharing in the States (didn't catch where). Everyone just pitched up to a car park in suburbia first thing in the morning, then drivers would pull up, say where they were going and give people a lift. Question is, if you accept a few quid from your passenger (petrol costs and so on), do you become an illegal minicab?

jacko lah

3,297 posts

272 months

Monday 5th July 2004
quotequote all
My insurance has it spelt out, theres a whole section on NOT for Profit Lift-Sharing.

I can take money to help cover costs as long as it's not for profit.

Mad Dave

7,158 posts

286 months

Monday 5th July 2004
quotequote all
Will bikes be included in this daft scheme then? Because on the one hand we're told just how dangerous bikes are, and on the other they're telling us to cram a pillion on! LOL

DustyC

12,820 posts

277 months

Monday 5th July 2004
quotequote all
Im assuming they'll be making another BMW/Merc/Volvo lane though. Else where are they expected to drive?

jacko lah

3,297 posts

272 months

Monday 5th July 2004
quotequote all
Mad Dave said:
Will bikes be included in this daft scheme then? Because on the one hand we're told just how dangerous bikes are, and on the other they're telling us to cram a pillion on! LOL



On my mountain bike ? A Pillion ? I sometimes put my daughter on the handlebars are ride around the garden.

streaky

19,311 posts

272 months

Monday 5th July 2004
quotequote all
Peter Ward said:

streaky said:
Which are obsolescent as cyclists will be allowed to ride on the footway regardless of rim/frame size. But I bet they don't remove them! - Streaky


When will cyclists be allowed to ride on the path? I've missed that announcement.
I read it in one of the broadsheets about four to six weeks ago (IIRC). Can't find an online reference though - Streaky