Why does HMRC bank with Citi?
Author
Discussion

Spiritual_Beggar

Original Poster:

4,833 posts

225 months

Wednesday 11th January 2012
quotequote all
http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/payinghmrc/vat-payt.htm

I know it's fairly old news now, what with them making this change back in '09.....


But why does HMRC bank with Citi....an American bank?


There may be a simple, valid reason for this...in which case one of the more enlightened on here may be able to help me out.


I just find it rather strange that Her Majesty's Shylocks use a foreign bank to receive VAT returns.

davepoth

29,395 posts

230 months

Wednesday 11th January 2012
quotequote all
They put it out to tender, and Citi were cheapest, I imagine. Granted now we own RBS it would make sense to get them to do it.

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

277 months

Wednesday 11th January 2012
quotequote all
Spiritual_Beggar said:
I just find it rather strange that Her Majesty's Shylocks use a foreign bank to receive VAT returns.
Yes, my reaction was exactly the same as yours.

Making my payments via Barclays their website only offered "VAT Southend" as the payment option so that's what I used. Hopefully it will reach the right place....

Eric Mc

125,855 posts

296 months

Wednesday 11th January 2012
quotequote all
Funny, but they wrote me loads of letters a year ago saying they were changing to RBS.

And yet, their payslips still have Alliance & Leiceter written on them.

Do they know what they are doing?

12gauge

1,274 posts

205 months

Thursday 12th January 2012
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Do they know what they are doing?
Highly unlikely. HMRC still seem to think im working somewhere i havent worked in nearly 4 years...

Eric Mc

125,855 posts

296 months

Thursday 12th January 2012
quotequote all
12gauge said:
Eric Mc said:
Do they know what they are doing?
Highly unlikely. HMRC still seem to think im working somewhere i havent worked in nearly 4 years...
Scrounger.

Digga

48,555 posts

314 months

Thursday 12th January 2012
quotequote all
davepoth said:
They put it out to tender, and Citi were cheapestput on the best lunch, I imagine.
Corruption, it's everywhere once you start looking. That and, as has also been mentioned, rank innefficiency and chaos - that they appear to be using umpty-million different banks, in fact.

hornet

6,333 posts

281 months

Thursday 12th January 2012
quotequote all
12gauge said:
Highly unlikely. HMRC still seem to think im working somewhere i havent worked in nearly 4 years...
They spent several years getting me mixed up with my Dad due to us sharing letters in our initials (not even in the same order!), then managed to duplicate my details rather than correct them. Never mind all this stuff about avoidance and evasion, just getting the existing system working would be a start.

Killer2005

20,639 posts

259 months

Thursday 12th January 2012
quotequote all
Digga said:
davepoth said:
They put it out to tender, and Citi were cheapestput on the best lunch, I imagine.
Corruption, it's everywhere once you start looking. That and, as has also been mentioned, rank innefficiency and chaos - that they appear to be using umpty-million different banks, in fact.
The DWP use HSBC

Surely it would be easier to have it all under one bank?

Bing o

15,184 posts

250 months

Friday 13th January 2012
quotequote all
Digga said:
davepoth said:
They put it out to tender, and Citi were cheapestput on the best lunch, I imagine.
Corruption, it's everywhere once you start looking. That and, as has also been mentioned, rank innefficiency and chaos - that they appear to be using umpty-million different banks, in fact.
Because putting all of your financial instructions through one bank is totally safe because no bank goes bankrupt ever does it?

I also hope that you guys and Haymarket can afford the legal fees for libel.

Eric Mc

125,855 posts

296 months

Friday 13th January 2012
quotequote all
Who's been libelled?

The inefficiency of HMRC is legendary. I frequent enough tax and accounting forums and read enough tax and accounting periodicals to know that criticsm of HMRC is the norm and that HMRC are well aware of it.

If they were to sue every organisation that carried such criticsm they wouldn't have time to do their proper work - which they do badly anyway.

XJSJohn

16,152 posts

250 months

Friday 13th January 2012
quotequote all
Bing o said:
Digga said:
davepoth said:
They put it out to tender, and Citi were cheapestput on the best lunch, I imagine.
Corruption, it's everywhere once you start looking. That and, as has also been mentioned, rank innefficiency and chaos - that they appear to be using umpty-million different banks, in fact.
Because putting all of your financial instructions through one bank is totally safe because no bank goes bankrupt ever does it?

I also hope that you guys and Haymarket can afford the legal fees for libel.
covered in the T&C's

PH T and Cs said:
User Supplied Content

The website contains material submitted and created by private and trade advertisers and other third parties. We exclude all liability for any illegality arising from such material, or any errors, omissions or inaccuracies in such material.
she'll be alright mate!

Digga

48,555 posts

314 months

Friday 13th January 2012
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Who's been libelled?

The inefficiency of HMRC is legendary. I frequent enough tax and accounting forums and read enough tax and accounting periodicals to know that criticsm of HMRC is the norm and that HMRC are well aware of it.

If they were to sue every organisation that carried such criticsm they wouldn't have time to do their proper work - which they do badly anyway.
Quite so.

Bingo, I know you're non-resident, so you may have missed this: http://www.accountingweb.co.uk/article/2011-ballad...

As regards cosy lunches, at least as far as Dave Hartnet is concerned, I rest my case. wink

I have inside information on a lot worse, but that I will not be posting.

Bing o

15,184 posts

250 months

Friday 13th January 2012
quotequote all
Digga said:
Eric Mc said:
Who's been libelled?

The inefficiency of HMRC is legendary. I frequent enough tax and accounting forums and read enough tax and accounting periodicals to know that criticsm of HMRC is the norm and that HMRC are well aware of it.

If they were to sue every organisation that carried such criticsm they wouldn't have time to do their proper work - which they do badly anyway.
Quite so.

Bingo, I know you're non-resident, so you may have missed this: http://www.accountingweb.co.uk/article/2011-ballad...

As regards cosy lunches, at least as far as Dave Hartnet is concerned, I rest my case. wink

I have inside information on a lot worse, but that I will not be posting.
Fair do's. I just wouldn't suggest on a public forum that corrupt practices were taking place smile

Anyway, I wouldn't blame HMRC for not putting all their eggs in one basket - it's not like banks don't put up charges when they think they have a captive client...

Eric Mc

125,855 posts

296 months

Friday 13th January 2012
quotequote all
I have no problem with HMRC having more than one bank account or even more than one banker. However, what they need to do is communicate effectively with the taxpayer so the taxpayer knows exactly where they should be paying their taxes.

In July they failed to send out millions of Statements of Account to enable self assessment taxpayers to pay their 2nd Payments on Account for 2010/11, This left many people unsure how much they had to pay and how to pay, as they didn't have the relevant payslip nor the payment references (which are vital to ensure the taxpayer gets credited with the amount they have paid).

HMRC's excuse was that the requirement to print the July Statements of Account was at an unprecedented level. This was complete and utter bks as they had printed out successfully exactly the same number of Statements of Account for the 1st 2010/11 Payments on Account in January 2011.

In many, many areas HMRC are completely dysfunctional.