Most Improved Car Maker since 2000
Discussion
I was thinking the other day, as you do, about how some car makers have made massive strides forward in the last ten years or so - not much more than one model cycle.
Hyundai for example.
2000 Elantra: pug-ugly and terrible.

2011 i40: possibly the best looking car in the class, and damn good by all accounts.

And the Veloster: odd doors, but what a stunner.

Or Kia:
2000 Sephia/Shuma: can scare children and indice nausea.

2010 Soul: Stupid name, but a funky little (actually, not so little) thing:

And the Sportage is a great looking motor too (even if it does look like a stormtrooper's helmet).

Which maker would you nominate as 'most improved'?
Hyundai for example.
2000 Elantra: pug-ugly and terrible.
2011 i40: possibly the best looking car in the class, and damn good by all accounts.

And the Veloster: odd doors, but what a stunner.

Or Kia:
2000 Sephia/Shuma: can scare children and indice nausea.

2010 Soul: Stupid name, but a funky little (actually, not so little) thing:

And the Sportage is a great looking motor too (even if it does look like a stormtrooper's helmet).

Which maker would you nominate as 'most improved'?
DR10 said:
Kia and Hyundai yes, but also Proton and Suzuki? How about Land Rover?
Land Rover's a good call too. From the faintly crummy Freelander, Disco 2 and P300(?) Range, to the current Evoque, Disco and RR/SS? Good work.That makes me think of Jag too. Saw a new XJ L this morning: stunning car.
I'd agree with Hyundai & Kia, they need to release a few more models that they sell in the US over here. Some real lookers that we don't get. The Hyundai Genesis coupe for example, stunning looking car and either 2.0 litre turbo or 3.5 v6 and rear wheel drive. They're really messed up not bringing that car over here.
Jaguar is a good shout but I think including Lamborghini and Aston Martin kind of goes against the 'spirit' of this thread- they are top end cars, you expect revolutionary design.
That's why the Koreans are such a good example IMO- gone from a whole range of chaff to a whole range of very persuasive models.
That's why the Koreans are such a good example IMO- gone from a whole range of chaff to a whole range of very persuasive models.
Classic Grad 98 said:
Not sure about this one. They seem to have designed one car and basically stretched it/squashed it to make a range of different sizes.
Think of the Audi range in 2000. A3, A4, A6, A8 and TT. Now the various fugly but profitable SUVs (Q3, Q5, Q7 - see loads about), A5, A1, R8 and a variety of new engines that weren't even thought about in 2000 like the V10 from the RS6, etc. Plus they challenge the established Euro luxury players on every level these days, whilst in 2000 they were way out from left field luxury choices.Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



