Drove a new sprinter today.
Drove a new sprinter today.
Author
Discussion

Piepiepie

Original Poster:

1,347 posts

177 months

Tuesday 17th January 2012
quotequote all
519CDI with the 3.0 v6 and an automatic box.

Bloody. Beautiful.

Brilliant noise under accleration, didn't roll that much, and the autobox managed the power perfectly, both at high and low revs.

Drove almost as good as any car i've driven in a long long time.

Felt a lot better than the old sprinter (although i maintain the old one was more noisy which is better laugh ) and felt very well built considering it is 'just a van'.




skip_1

3,496 posts

213 months

Tuesday 17th January 2012
quotequote all
I have one currently and am getting really pissed off trying to defrost the inside of the windscreen in the mornings. At least the Transit heaters get hot quickly.

Other than that it is an OK van.

anonymous-user

77 months

Tuesday 17th January 2012
quotequote all
IIRC the way Merc used to badge the sprinters up is the first number is the payload in ton and the last two numbers is the bhp with the zero chopped off.

So, if they still badge them up that way that 519cdi would have 190bhp and be capable of carrying 5 ton. Bet its a lot of fun empty with RWD and no weight over the rear axle cool

Vladimir

6,917 posts

181 months

Tuesday 17th January 2012
quotequote all
Our new van has 180bhp, is AWD and is very nicely finished off.

The small fly in the ointment is that it weighs 2.6 tonnes!!!

Have Merc sorted reliability and rust issues on their vans yet? They were shocking for it for a while!

anonymous-user

77 months

Tuesday 17th January 2012
quotequote all
it wasn't rust, it was 'patina' wink

skip_1

3,496 posts

213 months

Tuesday 17th January 2012
quotequote all
Vladimir said:
The small fly in the ointment is that it weighs 2.6 tonnes!!!
Hear you here, ours only carries just over a tonne!

Vladimir

6,917 posts

181 months

Tuesday 17th January 2012
quotequote all
skip_1 said:
Hear you here, ours only carries just over a tonne!
Ours carries less than half a tonne! (It's a VW Cali!)

jas xjr

11,309 posts

262 months

Tuesday 17th January 2012
quotequote all
I learned to drive in a big mercedes van. What people do not realise is how much fun vans can be.
A lot are rear wheel drive , big brakes and uprated suspension. What's not to like ?

martin mrt

3,878 posts

224 months

Tuesday 17th January 2012
quotequote all
yellowbentines said:
IIRC the way Merc used to badge the sprinters up is the first number is the payload in ton and the last two numbers is the bhp with the zero chopped off.

So, if they still badge them up that way that 519cdi would have 190bhp and be capable of carrying 5 ton. Bet its a lot of fun empty with RWD and no weight over the rear axle cool
Your close, but not quite there,

The first number denotes their gross weight, usually, however some of the larger ones can be "down rated" to 3500kgs gross weight so as they can be driven on a post 1997 Car licence

So for example a

2... Is usually 2800kgs Gross
3... Is usually 3500kgs Gross
4... Is usually 4600kgs Gross
Etc etc

The last two numbers in the badge you are quite correct, denotes the BHP figure

Shame that the 3.0 190bhp Sprinter in question is limited to 56mph now

davepoth

29,395 posts

222 months

Tuesday 17th January 2012
quotequote all
martin mrt said:
Your close, but not quite there,

The first number denotes their gross weight, usually, however some of the larger ones can be "down rated" to 3500kgs gross weight so as they can be driven on a post 1997 Car licence

So for example a

2... Is usually 2800kgs Gross
3... Is usually 3500kgs Gross
4... Is usually 4600kgs Gross
Etc etc

The last two numbers in the badge you are quite correct, denotes the BHP figure

Shame that the 3.0 190bhp Sprinter in question is limited to 56mph now
That does seem a little bit of a waste. frown

Piepiepie

Original Poster:

1,347 posts

177 months

Tuesday 17th January 2012
quotequote all
martin mrt said:
Your close, but not quite there,

The first number denotes their gross weight, usually, however some of the larger ones can be "down rated" to 3500kgs gross weight so as they can be driven on a post 1997 Car licence

So for example a

2... Is usually 2800kgs Gross
3... Is usually 3500kgs Gross
4... Is usually 4600kgs Gross
Etc etc

The last two numbers in the badge you are quite correct, denotes the BHP figure

Shame that the 3.0 190bhp Sprinter in question is limited to 56mph now
Yep, those figures are correct, and the one i was driving is totally unrestricted.

Muwahahahaahah.

drivingtank


BonzoG

1,554 posts

237 months

Tuesday 17th January 2012
quotequote all
We had a 319CDI on hire at work ages ago - lovely big beast to drive and it did sound good.

Now got new Movanos as our 'big' vans - much nicer inside than the Merc, decent engines too, but FWD and turning circle of a bus. frown

The reduced speed limits for light vans are bad enough, but I do find it amusing that the exact same van with a different plate, (sometimes) has to be restricted when they put a '5' instead of a '3' on the back end. The law is an ass!

Edited by BonzoG on Tuesday 17th January 23:31

mattley

3,029 posts

245 months

Tuesday 17th January 2012
quotequote all
Many years ago I drove Transits.

They carried as much as we could get in.