Wikipedia closed for the day
Discussion
Papa Hotel said:
Robb F said:
who?
These idiots who think they're making a difference by switching off their websites. Who are they inconveniencing? Not the US gobbermint, they don't give a s
t. No, they're inconveniencing normal people, like every ill-conceived strike. williamp said:
Sounds like you use it regularly .Time for some old fashionned proper research, utilising different forms of media (books?? Library??) and reading and deciding between different sources of conflicting evidence.
No, I use it to while away the time when the wife won't let me have the remote control cos some s
t cookery competition "just gets tougher". For anybody who really needs to access possibly inaccurate information or whether to see if a celebrity is dead here's a link that helps you get wiki on "blackout day"
http://ibnlive.in.com/news/how-to-access-wikipedia...
http://ibnlive.in.com/news/how-to-access-wikipedia...
Papa Hotel said:
These idiots who think they're making a difference by switching off their websites. Who are they inconveniencing? Not the US gobbermint, they don't give a s
t. No, they're inconveniencing normal people, like every ill-conceived strike.
I take it you don't agree with their actions then?
t. No, they're inconveniencing normal people, like every ill-conceived strike. Personally, I am completely in support of it. If the SOPA is passed, it will give record labels, movie studios etc the ability to force Google, Paypal, Yahoo etc to remove the offending website from their service. The stupid thing is that all it takes is a letter that states the site must be taken down within 5 days. No proof is required, no courts, no trial. It is a complete contradiction of 'innocent until proven guilty'.
It's the beginnings of internet censorship and I am glad Wikipedia and others are taking a stand against it.
The Beaver King said:
Papa Hotel said:
These idiots who think they're making a difference by switching off their websites. Who are they inconveniencing? Not the US gobbermint, they don't give a s
t. No, they're inconveniencing normal people, like every ill-conceived strike.
I take it you don't agree with their actions then?
t. No, they're inconveniencing normal people, like every ill-conceived strike. Personally, I am completely in support of it. If the SOPA is passed, it will give record labels, movie studios etc the ability to force Google, Paypal, Yahoo etc to remove the offending website from their service. The stupid thing is that all it takes is a letter that states the site must be taken down within 5 days. No proof is required, no courts, no trial. It is a complete contradiction of 'innocent until proven guilty'.
It's the beginnings of internet censorship and I am glad Wikipedia and others are taking a stand against it.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff




