Gear dilema
Author
Discussion

RobDickinson

Original Poster:

31,343 posts

283 months

Thursday 19th January 2012
quotequote all
I've got the change to get my hands on a used canon 17mm ts-e.

Currently have 7D, 10-20 (which is pants) , 17-55(ace) 50/1.4(good) 70-200/2.8L(great, heavy)

I had a plan to go to: 5D3 (or 5D2) , 17-40L, 24tse, 24-105, 70-300L

Now I think I will end up with a FF body , possibly a 5D2 , sometime, regardless.

But the 17tse will work very well on the 7D, and will out wide the 10-20 if shifted/stitched... (8.2mm!)

Still it has filter issues and I can get an imported one for similar money (new) and the same price as the 24tse...

Simpo Two

92,708 posts

294 months

Thursday 19th January 2012
quotequote all
You need to ask that Canon chap, Rob somebody I think he is smile

RobDickinson

Original Poster:

31,343 posts

283 months

Thursday 19th January 2012
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
You need to ask that Canon chap, Rob somebody I think he is smile
bks I think he will be ages...

The filetr issue is the biggest I think.

On FF which would I rather have (both are too much for now!) prubably the 24.

The 17 would work well on both crop and ff tho...

K12beano

20,854 posts

304 months

Thursday 19th January 2012
quotequote all
Playing devil's advocate - what are the filter issues, and why would they override an otherwise great acquisition? Ain't nothing a filter can do that you can't get around somehow.

RobDickinson

Original Poster:

31,343 posts

283 months

Thursday 19th January 2012
quotequote all
K12beano said:
Playing devil's advocate - what are the filter issues, and why would they override an otherwise great acquisition? Ain't nothing a filter can do that you can't get around somehow.
Well I could exposure blend more! but ND's for long exp and polarisers are out.

17tse has a bulbous front element meaning you need to hack a filter holder and the filtes need to be HUGE to work if you are goin gto shift (6x6 inches), $400usd for a polariser etc...

Just found out the 17 works well with a 1.4 tc....

K12beano

20,854 posts

304 months

Thursday 19th January 2012
quotequote all
RobDickinson said:
Well I could exposure blend more! but ND's for long exp and polarisers are out.

17tse has a bulbous front element meaning you need to hack a filter holder and the filtes need to be HUGE to work if you are goin gto shift (6x6 inches), $400usd for a polariser etc...

Just found out the 17 works well with a 1.4 tc....
Yeah, but, no, but, yeah, but.... you're not going to use a polariser on something as wide as 17mm are you - or maybe on a cropped sensor, I suppose.... scratchchin

And (excuse me I know so little about Canon beyond the difference between A1, AV1, AE1 and AT1 (shows my age!)) won't it take a filter at the rear for ND?


nah - bracket and blend!

baz7175

3,551 posts

240 months

Friday 20th January 2012
quotequote all
O/T - twice in a row I read that title as Dear Gilema... biggrin