FTO or MR2

Author
Discussion

Big_M

Original Poster:

5,602 posts

264 months

Tuesday 6th July 2004
quotequote all
Only got 4 months until my mega endowment payout and being able to spend about £10,000 on a car - but will probably end up spending £12,000

It needs to be an automatic - ie no clutch - as I have a crumbling patella in my left knee and my journey to work (40 miles a day)can often include heavy traffic. So do I go for the FTO tiptronic or the MR2 Semi auto version? I have always wanted an FTO but do have concerns about servicing and finding a good one - they seem to be getting rarer.

I like the thought of the convertible MR2 - I don't need 4 seats and it looks like it will be cheaper to insure.

Comments please

mrflibbles

7,692 posts

284 months

Tuesday 6th July 2004
quotequote all
IMHO the FTO is all show and no go.

and, if IIRC EVO did an automatic / tiptronic / sequential gearbox test, and IIRC the MR2 sequential did quite poorly.

Sorry to be pessimistic and not much help!

Big_M

Original Poster:

5,602 posts

264 months

Tuesday 6th July 2004
quotequote all
mrflibbles said:
Sorry to be pessimistic and not much help!
errr - any other suggestions then? Needs to be economical as well so V12s are out of the question.

mustard

6,992 posts

246 months

Tuesday 6th July 2004
quotequote all
MR2 SMT roadsters are dreadful things, and the gearbox problems are not unknown

andy mac

73,668 posts

256 months

Tuesday 6th July 2004
quotequote all
The FTO looks a hell of a lot better than the mk3 MR2, BUT, the MR2 will run rings around it on the road. Why not get a mk2 beams? That has 200 bhp. Or you could opt for an RX7, which is a great car!!

andy mac

73,668 posts

256 months

Wednesday 7th July 2004
quotequote all
Auto is pretty much the same for any car, unless you are gonna spend a shitload.. Forgot about auto anyway... Do wreck 7's come in autos? Thesmt on mr2 is bad. You change gear and you count to 10 before it does anything!

Mr E

21,742 posts

260 months

Wednesday 7th July 2004
quotequote all
Hmm. A mate runs a new MR2 with a sequential box. He claims it's not a SMT (steptronic) but a real gearbox much like the SMG in the M3.

He swears by it. Worth a look perhaps.

Or just buy a Griff 500 and leave it in 3rd......

Big_M

Original Poster:

5,602 posts

264 months

Wednesday 7th July 2004
quotequote all
Mr E said:
Or just buy a Griff 500 and leave it in 3rd......

Got one of those already - Mr Big does let me drive it but it is wearing on my knee.

Another option is spend less and get a Honda CRX DelSol - anyone any experience of these? They come in an auto version. Seems to be a gap in the market for a reasonably priced auto coupe or two seat convertible. Can't afford a Mazzer or Jag.

Big_M

Original Poster:

5,602 posts

264 months

Wednesday 7th July 2004
quotequote all
Thanks sweetie

andy mac

73,668 posts

256 months

Wednesday 7th July 2004
quotequote all
have you ever considered an MX5, or a lotus Elan? MX5 can be turbo'd if you want big power with simple bolt on kits www.mx5parts.com for 2K, and the elan, well its a lotus! great handling cars, and the MX5 turbo really is a sleeper!

trooper1212

9,456 posts

253 months

Thursday 8th July 2004
quotequote all
Big_M said:


Another option is spend less and get a Honda CRX DelSol - anyone any experience of these?


Drove one of these when I was looking at buying my MX5.

ahahahahahahahahahahahahah <cough> ahahahahahahaha...

... No.

andy mac

73,668 posts

256 months

Thursday 8th July 2004
quotequote all
The del sol is just a rebodied civic....

trooper1212

9,456 posts

253 months

Thursday 8th July 2004
quotequote all
andy mac said:
The del sol is just a rebodied civic....


and a nice enough car in manual form, the automatic is laughable.

Hates_

778 posts

254 months

Thursday 8th July 2004
quotequote all
You don't want FWD [tongue]

dejoux

772 posts

284 months

Friday 9th July 2004
quotequote all
Ive got a (manual)del sol SiR. Ive been more than happy with it and plan to keep it for a year or two yet. But...

An auto wont give you startling performance itll do a low 17 1/4 unless you get a SOHC which will probably be closer to 20 in auto form :P

Stay away from small Honda autos. Its a great car (for its price) in manual form but combine a motor that needs to be revved with a detuned motor for autos and higher drive train loss theyre pretty lethargic.

Id suggest any of the three other cars mentioned in this thread over an auto del sol. Dont really have experience with them though so wont make a suggestion

Hows that for an unbiased answer

Big_M

Original Poster:

5,602 posts

264 months

Sunday 25th July 2004
quotequote all
Gaz - do you know the age of the FTO? Apparently the later models (P onwards) had a five speed tip box and not the four speed which is better.

Think I am going to have to try each one out before I make my mind up. Both are going to be a lot more gutsy than my Nova.

seaton

400 posts

255 months

Monday 26th July 2004
quotequote all
200sx
Love mine, but never driven an auto.

Can I just say i've been reading PH for a while now, and it's quite obvious you realy want an FTO, you'll kick yourelf if you dont get one, trust me.


>> Edited by seaton on Monday 26th July 16:58

tuttle

3,427 posts

238 months

Tuesday 27th July 2004
quotequote all
Have to agree with Seaton.SX's are a really fun run & very easy to up the horses.(I've seen a couple dyno'ed @ 400 +420-the exhaust manif was glowing bright red tho
If your set on MR2 or FTO got the MR2 route defi