Since when were these so cheap...
Since when were these so cheap...
Author
Discussion

CarlT

Original Poster:

3,424 posts

267 months

Saturday 21st January 2012
quotequote all

McSam

6,753 posts

195 months

Saturday 21st January 2012
quotequote all
Coincidentally I watched Layer Cake the other day and had to have a look too! biggrin

I found this lovely beastie:



Ad here

Absolutely bloody gorgeous cloud9

jason s4

16,810 posts

190 months

Saturday 21st January 2012
quotequote all
And big running costs to go with it.

GarryA

4,700 posts

184 months

Saturday 21st January 2012
quotequote all
CarlT said:
I reckon I'd want at least the purchase cost in the bank for service / running it.

CarlT

Original Poster:

3,424 posts

267 months

Saturday 21st January 2012
quotequote all
GarryA said:
I reckon I'd want at least the purchase cost in the bank for service / running it.
True. But, having owned one for a year - they are an amazing car to drive. Much awesomeness

Maxus

1,159 posts

201 months

Saturday 21st January 2012
quotequote all
On a similar theme, when did this happen?

http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/2951263.htm

anonymous-user

74 months

Saturday 21st January 2012
quotequote all
Not that cheap, it's still £10,000. £10,000 on a 9 year old Audi with 106,000 miles is pretty steep.

Fox-

13,483 posts

266 months

Saturday 21st January 2012
quotequote all
Maxus said:
On a similar theme, when did this happen?

http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/2951263.htm
About a month after they first came out laugh

Dave Hedgehog

15,574 posts

224 months

Saturday 21st January 2012
quotequote all
jason s4 said:
And big running costs to go with it.
monumental running costs i think

one of the car clubs (F1 i think) did a bit in evo a while back about the running costs of there fleet, the lambo cost the most by some margin then the RS6, more than there fezzas etc!

CarlT

Original Poster:

3,424 posts

267 months

Saturday 21st January 2012
quotequote all
MSTRBKR said:
Not that cheap, it's still £10,000. £10,000 on a 9 year old Audi with 106,000 miles is pretty steep.
A £65k+ car when new, 444bhp and sub 4.5 to 60, so not just any 9 year old 106k mile Audi!

wackojacko

8,581 posts

210 months

Saturday 21st January 2012
quotequote all
High mileage examples will arse rape even more than lesser mileage examples. Unless you have deeeeep pockets just don't.


When they break (like all fast audis) they are eye wateringly expensive.

anonymous-user

74 months

Saturday 21st January 2012
quotequote all
CarlT said:
A £65k+ car when new, 444bhp and sub 4.5 to 60, so not just any 9 year old 106k mile Audi!
I take that point but £10,000 is a lot of money and there's a lot of choice out there for the 10k buyer. You'd have to be damn sure you wanted it!

jason s4

16,810 posts

190 months

Saturday 21st January 2012
quotequote all
wackojacko said:
When they break (like all fast audis) they are eye wateringly expensive.
All fast cars will break and be expensive, not just Audi's.

When you have owned and maintained a fast car then your opinion will be more respected.


Edited by jason s4 on Saturday 21st January 17:43

wolf1

3,091 posts

270 months

Saturday 21st January 2012
quotequote all
Somehow I expect this thread will go the same way as the M5 one did. Plenty of people claiming it will cost you your house and your sanity and the rest saying it won't cost that much.

Fox-

13,483 posts

266 months

Saturday 21st January 2012
quotequote all
jason s4 said:
All fast cars will break and be expensive, not just Audi's.

When you have owned and maintained a fast car then your opinion will be more respected.
You dont have an RS6 either so he's as entitled to his opinion as you are. An S4 is a rather different animal to an RS6.

jason s4

16,810 posts

190 months

Saturday 21st January 2012
quotequote all
Fox- said:
You dont have an RS6 either so he's as entitled to his opinion as you are. An S4 is a rather different animal to an RS6.
I used to own/run an RS6+ Avant and the wife used the S4.

She then took a job which was a further commute, so we made the decision to get rid of the oldest on the fleet.

And yes, it was a lot to run, but that never put me off using it on a daily basis.

DRC was never an issue or gearbox, similarly a friend of mine who had a saloon non +.

Back to the OP, a lot of these cars are starting to get into high miles which is a bit of an unknown territory.





MartyPubes

900 posts

179 months

Saturday 21st January 2012
quotequote all
wolf1 said:
Somehow I expect this thread will go the same way as the M5 one did. Plenty of people claiming it will cost you your house and your sanity and the rest saying it won't cost that much.
You've forgotten option 3 - people claiming that they're no less ruinous to run than a Focus if you undertake regular preventative maintenance the fact that this maintenance is ruinous is besides the point.

Personally I've never really understood who buys this sort of car at this price bracket. If you can afford to run one you can almost always afford a better example.

Dave Hedgehog

15,574 posts

224 months

Saturday 21st January 2012
quotequote all
MartyPubes said:
Personally I've never really understood who buys this sort of car at this price bracket. If you can afford to run one you can almost always afford a better example.
thats the truth of it, if you can afford to run one you can afford to hunt around pay a bit more and get a tidy one