Why 15" wheels over 17" for 205 track car
Why 15" wheels over 17" for 205 track car
Author
Discussion

bobbio

Original Poster:

14 posts

170 months

Sunday 22nd January 2012
quotequote all
Hi all. New on here but wanted to ask everyones opinion on this point. I had a Peugeot 205 years ago and changed the standard wheels to 17" comp MO's. They were lighter and in my opinion the car handled better with less tyre flex... But in many forums I am finding people hate this and swearing you should use 15's. I am now currently building a 205 track car and have big brakes to fit so want to fit 17's but wonder why all the hang ups people have about this!??!

wolves_wanderer

12,927 posts

260 months

Sunday 22nd January 2012
quotequote all
People who read too many car mags and parrot the "big wheels=worse handling" line probably.

HereBeMonsters

14,180 posts

205 months

Sunday 22nd January 2012
quotequote all
Lighter than the standard SMRs, probably. But look at how light the 15" MOs are.

In fact, I would say even 15"s are slightly over-wheeling it on a 205. If I could I would go for some 1.6 wheels on my 1.9 for trackdays.

bobbio

Original Poster:

14 posts

170 months

Sunday 22nd January 2012
quotequote all
Ye probably. The french guys are ok about it and thats the cars country of origin!

bobbio

Original Poster:

14 posts

170 months

Sunday 22nd January 2012
quotequote all
HereBeMonsters said:
Lighter than the standard SMRs, probably. But look at how light the 15" MOs are.

In fact, I would say even 15"s are slightly over-wheeling it on a 205. If I could I would go for some 1.6 wheels on my 1.9 for trackdays.
Well the French F2000 series run 17's and 18's with big brakes and big results too. Ok they have maxi arches but thats just external space.

EDLT

15,421 posts

229 months

Sunday 22nd January 2012
quotequote all
Can't you just put lower profile tyres on lightweight 15" wheels, then you get the best of both worlds. Also, does a 205 really need brakes that are THAT big?

bobbio

Original Poster:

14 posts

170 months

Sunday 22nd January 2012
quotequote all
On multi lap use, bigger brakes are more effective

happygoron

467 posts

212 months

Sunday 22nd January 2012
quotequote all
Tyre price and availability a big issue. There are some that run 13s to get cheap slicks I think.

The Moose

23,562 posts

232 months

Sunday 22nd January 2012
quotequote all
happygoron said:
Tyre price and availability a big issue. There are some that run 13s to get cheap slicks I think.
This is my thought. No idea if right, but certainly a consideration

BeefMaster9000

82 posts

247 months

Sunday 22nd January 2012
quotequote all
Like for like 15" compomotives will be lighter than 17" compomotives.

Reducing the mass of your unsprung rotating components is the most effective form of weight saving - 1kg saved on the mass of your wheels/tyres is worth ~ 4kg saved from your chassis.

Tyres for the 15" wheels will also be cheaper to replace - which is handy for a track car.

17" wheels will also (negatively) affect your engines ability to accelerate the car unless you compensate by changing your diff / gearbox ratios and or extract more torque from your engine.

Finally, it will also affect the cars ride & handling, though this is more subjective and will vary from car to car.




Edited by BeefMaster9000 on Sunday 22 January 16:36

bobbio

Original Poster:

14 posts

170 months

Sunday 22nd January 2012
quotequote all
Cheers for your thoughts guys. The rolling radius of the 17" tyres and 15's is not that much different because of the lower profile 17's. The 17" tyres weigh less as there is less rubber. The final drive im using makes the gearing lower anyway so the slightly longer radius is ok. The extra is ok by me but could be a problem on a mega tight budget

kambites

70,771 posts

244 months

Sunday 22nd January 2012
quotequote all
I'd go for the lightest wheel/tyre/brake (with good enough brakes to avoid overheating, obviously) combination I could find.

Rovinghawk

13,300 posts

181 months

Sunday 22nd January 2012
quotequote all
I changed from 16" to 17" wheels for track use & it improved handing considerably.

RH

bobbio

Original Poster:

14 posts

170 months

Sunday 22nd January 2012
quotequote all
cool RH so im not the only one that liked the larger wheels

kambites

70,771 posts

244 months

Sunday 22nd January 2012
quotequote all
Well it's a track car, not a racing car, so ultimately it doesn't make the faintest bit of difference how fast you're going. What matters is that you enjoy driving it, so fit whatever you like best.

VinceFox

20,566 posts

195 months

Sunday 22nd January 2012
quotequote all
Because race car?

rallycross

13,692 posts

260 months

Sunday 22nd January 2012
quotequote all
17" Far too big on a 205
And tyres cost much more
205 Was designed to run on 14 or 15"'wheels. You can fit large enough brakes for a quick 205 within 15"'wheels.

Over tyred and under powered is not a good combination for track day fun.

sjabrown

2,067 posts

183 months

Sunday 22nd January 2012
quotequote all
I'm considering moving from 14 inch to 15 inch for tarmac rallies. Wouldn't contemplate anything further than that though some of the French got to bigger rims for home brewed "maxi" versions.

Surely 17 inch wheels will affect castor/camber and the rest of the suspension geometry so would need a lot of effort to get it to work right. The standard suspension geometry is pretty good on these.

GroundEffect

13,864 posts

179 months

Sunday 22nd January 2012
quotequote all
Was it just the wheels that were lighter? Did you include tyre mass in it too?

Also, as said above, 15" Compomotive will be EVEN lighter.

v8will

3,309 posts

219 months

Sunday 22nd January 2012
quotequote all
I wouldn't have said that Comp MO wheels were lightweight in any size.