Recommend me a decent 3D film
Author
Discussion

El Capitano

Original Poster:

1,157 posts

224 months

Tuesday 24th January 2012
quotequote all
Now, I'm not really too fussed about 3D TV to be honest, but why not give it a try as we have a new TV arriving tomorrow (samsung d7000) and have already set up the surround sound system and Blu Ray etc.

I don't know much about this topic, so, whats the best 3D film you have watched on a 3D TV. I don't think the converted standard format 2D films will be that great, so was thinking some films made by 3D cameras. Im not that into Avatar etc so probably Action/Thriller etc.

Any recommendations then?

Nightmare

5,279 posts

315 months

Tuesday 24th January 2012
quotequote all
frankly Avatar is, IMO, easily the best use of 3D so far (by miles in fact).
but the film is.....well a bit dull really, but watchable.

The 3D in Thor was pretty decent - used lots in scenery/vista type shots which is where the wow factor is more for me than things flying around the screen.

weyland yutani

1,410 posts

195 months

Tuesday 24th January 2012
quotequote all
Thor was fking horrible . . . the 3D wasn't very good either

El Capitano

Original Poster:

1,157 posts

224 months

Tuesday 24th January 2012
quotequote all
haha. Ok... so - now even if I haven't watched it, I really don't think I would enjoy Avatar.... but if it is the best maybe I should give it a go!
So far I have chosen these 3 and am about to order.

obvious PH choice: http://www.play.com/DVD/Blu-ray/4-/21619269/-/Prod...

as recommended: http://www.play.com/DVD/Blu-ray/4-/18894444/-/Prod...

and as I'm a plane geek and it got great 3D reviews: http://www.play.com/DVD/Blu-ray/4-/17390850/-/Prod... -anyone seen this in 3D


I will see whats what and prob end up buying Avatar next week if its that highly recommended!!

Nightmare

5,279 posts

315 months

Tuesday 24th January 2012
quotequote all
weyland yutani said:
Thor was fking horrible . . . the 3D wasn't very good either
really? sorry, disagree. thoroughly enjoyed the film.
The 3D wasnt great - but then Im not sure Ive seen anything, bar Avatar, where it WAS. hence I made that suggestion!

Nightmare

5,279 posts

315 months

Tuesday 24th January 2012
quotequote all
El Capitano said:
haha. Ok... so - now even if I haven't watched it, I really don't think I would enjoy Avatar.... but if it is the best maybe I should give it a go!
only the best in terms of 3D! Id be surprised if you actively didn't like the film. id also be surprised if you really did like it. its kinda like that. but it looks AMAZING.

TheInternet

5,272 posts

194 months

Tuesday 24th January 2012
quotequote all
Hugo seems to be the obvious suggestion.

Hackney

7,440 posts

239 months

Tuesday 24th January 2012
quotequote all
There are no good 3D films.
Next


TheInternet

5,272 posts

194 months

Tuesday 24th January 2012
quotequote all
Hackney said:
There are no good 3D films.
Next
There are no good colour films.
There are no good talkies.
There are no good flicks.
There are no good photographs.
There are no good drawings.
There are no good books.
There are no good stories.
There are no good emotions.
There are no god.
Next

El Capitano

Original Poster:

1,157 posts

224 months

Tuesday 24th January 2012
quotequote all
Hackney said:
There are no good 3D films.
Next
excellent advice. Seen them all?

Hackney

7,440 posts

239 months

Tuesday 24th January 2012
quotequote all
I can see I have to explain comment in more detail.
No film has been improved by being in 3D.
Films marketed with 3D as a selling point tend to be dross.

2D films converted to 3D don't work.

Ladies and gentlemen, I give you Citizen Kane......in 3D
It wouldn't be an improvement.

El Capitano

Original Poster:

1,157 posts

224 months

Tuesday 24th January 2012
quotequote all
Personal Opinion then....

I may well agree, but I will try it out and decide for myself and as I am buying a Tv that supports 3D I don't feel like I have much to lose. I have not bought this TV purely for the fact it is 3D, as mentioned in the original post... i'm not really that fussed about it. However I was just hoping someone would be able to pass on a recommendation for one that actually looks good on the screen.

- thanks for the couple of suggestions, I have gone and ordered those few I linked.

Cheers

Edited by El Capitano on Tuesday 24th January 21:45

Happy82

15,078 posts

200 months

Wednesday 25th January 2012
quotequote all
Piranha 3D

Jimski

275 posts

198 months

Wednesday 25th January 2012
quotequote all
TT3D: closer to the edge

I thought the 3D gives a sensation of speed, it was the first 3D film I saw and I thought it worked well considering it is a documentary

El Capitano

Original Poster:

1,157 posts

224 months

Wednesday 25th January 2012
quotequote all
hah, i couldn't quite bring myself to buy Piranha 3D.... mind you, seeing Kelly Brook in 3D has gotta be worth a fiver of my money I guess...

and I bought TT3D, looking forward to watching that!

Stig

11,823 posts

315 months

Wednesday 25th January 2012
quotequote all
I've just ordered about a dozen titles having recently finally taken the plunge and replaced one of my HD ready plasmas with a Full HD 3D Samsung. Seemed daft not to really especially now that the glasses have come down so much in price (I paid £15 a set for 4 pairs for Samsungs!).

I based my choices on films I knew I'd like, films that were shot for 3D (or animated stuff which they re-render for it) and random stuff with good Amazon feedback.

Reviews forthcoming...

thebluebus

3,558 posts

248 months

Wednesday 25th January 2012
quotequote all
El Capitano said:
Hackney said:
There are no good 3D films.
Next
excellent advice. Seen them all?
I believe Hackney is right. Any good 3D films are good films irrespective of whether they are in 3D - and will only look better when watched in 2D. Because the 3D reduces luminosity and clarity of the image, as well as having other effects on the way we perceive it.

3D does not work. Medically, it forces a discrepancy between the point of convergence of your eyes and the point of focus of your eyes - a situation that never occurs in real life.

Of course, that doesn't mean people can't choose to believe it's more fun having certain shapes appear to be nearer to you than the screen.

So by that logic, choose the best films and then see if there are 3D versions of them, then buy those.

Nightmare

5,279 posts

315 months

Wednesday 25th January 2012
quotequote all
thebluebus said:
I believe Hackney is right. Any good 3D films are good films irrespective of whether they are in 3D - and will only look better when watched in 2D. Because the 3D reduces luminosity and clarity of the image, as well as having other effects on the way we perceive it.

3D does not work. Medically, it forces a discrepancy between the point of convergence of your eyes and the point of focus of your eyes - a situation that never occurs in real life.

Of course, that doesn't mean people can't choose to believe it's more fun having certain shapes appear to be nearer to you than the screen.

So by that logic, choose the best films and then see if there are 3D versions of them, then buy those.
except by your logic surely you dont WANT to watch the best films in 3D as they'll be worse than if watched in 2D...then cheapening whole film? I also agree 100%. Until they do 'proper' 3D (see Johnny Lee's stuff) total waste of money and more often than not irritating.

Which is again why I have to say 'get Avatar' - because its a watchable story which WOULD be duller in 2D..and the 3D tech was specifically built and designed for it and the whole film was specifically designed and built around 3D. So you get a proper '3D film' and as far as i know (though Sanctu looks like it might be more so) there haven't been any others like that...more they've just 'added 3D effects to the film' which it would seem a fair few of us don't care about!

stargazer30

1,722 posts

197 months

Wednesday 25th January 2012
quotequote all
Avatar and Tron Legacy are supposed to be the best. I say supposed as you can't buy Avatar yet (cheers Panasonic!) and Tron Legacy is very pricey, about £25 IIRC.

The latest harry potter and tangled were good on ours but its one of the new LG passive 3D sets so the 3D is better IMO than the more common active units like the one we used to have.

Halb

53,012 posts

214 months

Wednesday 25th January 2012
quotequote all
I agree that no film is improved by the addition of 3d, not fundamentally.

The best one, Jaws 3d?