I finally found a group more delusional than creationists
Discussion
Bigfoot investigators. Is Finding Bigfoot shown back in Blighty? If not, consider yourselves lucky. Here's the first episode of the second season, but don't watch the entire thing - the first eleven seconds of part three should be all you need to see:
Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KbDuAHq0asY
Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5-4loDVtixk
Part 3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UJExxHeFtF4
Yes, he really did say what you thought he said.
Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KbDuAHq0asY
Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5-4loDVtixk
Part 3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UJExxHeFtF4
Yes, he really did say what you thought he said.
I love watching the pseudo science stuff... It amuses me no end! First thing I thought of with the baby Sasquatch it looks like a plastic bag floating about in an eddy. Even it swinging didn't look real.
The doc continues...
Squatches will swim below geese, and pluck them,max well as knock to keep track of each other. They rely mostly on hearing.. How the f
k do they know this s
t when they haven't even studied the bloody things?! Mental.Edited by TheHeretic on Wednesday 25th January 16:42
Nightmare said:
i may be wrong but hasn't Sir David Attenborough said he wouldn't be at all surprised if Bigfoot/yeti turned out to be 'true'? (ie similar enough thing actually existing to make it not urban rumour category)
It may well be true. What is hilarious is how they go about things in the program. "I heard a noise, so it must be a a yeti"
"Saquatch k ocks on wood to keep track of each other"
"It is more likely that it is a Sasquatch, then someone with glove style shoes"
"We are making a TV show, and whoever has seen a Bigfoot gets to be on TV... Who has seen a Bigfoot?"
TheHeretic said:
It may well be true. What is hilarious is how they go about things in the program.
"I heard a noise, so it must be a a yeti"
"Saquatch k ocks on wood to keep track of each other"
"It is more likely that it is a Sasquatch, then someone with glove style shoes"
"We are making a TV show, and whoever has seen a Bigfoot gets to be on TV... Who has seen a Bigfoot?"
"I heard a noise, so it must be a a yeti"
"Saquatch k ocks on wood to keep track of each other"
"It is more likely that it is a Sasquatch, then someone with glove style shoes"
"We are making a TV show, and whoever has seen a Bigfoot gets to be on TV... Who has seen a Bigfoot?"
its like those ghost programmes..."ghosthunters..the ghayest f**king how on television"shame is they're usually too retarded to even be remotely watchable!
Nightmare said:
its like those ghost programmes..."ghosthunters..the ghayest f**king how on television"shame is they're usually too retarded to even be remotely watchable!
If they're serious about getting high quality video evidence to help prove the existence of ghosts why is it that, in over 100 episodes, nobody has ever thought that it might be a good idea to TURN THE LIGHTS ON?
Nightmare said:
i may be wrong but hasn't Sir David Attenborough said he wouldn't be at all surprised if Bigfoot/yeti turned out to be 'true'? (ie similar enough thing actually existing to make it not urban rumour category)
I reckon it could be. I think there are hairs that have been found that have not been identified. The Chinese wild man is another well known one.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yeren
Brian Blessed was on QI a few weeks ago and he said the best place to spot one was Mongolia.
http://www.poetv.com/video.php?vid=103153
Gassing Station | TV, Film, Streaming & Radio | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



