Air New ZealandAn
Author
Discussion

Nickyboy

Original Poster:

6,823 posts

263 months

Thursday 26th January 2012
quotequote all
Anyone flown with them before?

Going to LA in October and they're coming in at £508 for flights, i read they've updated the long haul fleet with new 777's and have more lag room than most Transatlantic airlines.

Any experience?

Super Slo Mo

5,374 posts

227 months

Thursday 26th January 2012
quotequote all
Nickyboy said:
Anyone flown with them before?

Going to LA in October and they're coming in at £508 for flights, i read they've updated the long haul fleet with new 777's and have more lag room than most Transatlantic airlines.

Any experience?
Flown with them a few times, they're alright. Last time I went to LA with them, it was the 747. IMO a bit better than BA, not quite as good as Emirates, but the stewardesses did wander up and down the aisles for a good while after dinner offering wine top ups, which was nice!

IforB

9,840 posts

258 months

Thursday 26th January 2012
quotequote all
Air NZ are excellent. It may not be as flash as Emirates, but you get a bit more space in the back.

dvs_dave

9,040 posts

254 months

Friday 27th January 2012
quotequote all
+1 for Air NZ.

Nicholas Blair

4,111 posts

313 months

Friday 27th January 2012
quotequote all
Their Economy Plus (or whatever it is) offering is good I've heard. Chum went LA with them last month.

Eric Mc

125,606 posts

294 months

Friday 27th January 2012
quotequote all
Watch out for volcanoes en route.

BigS

873 posts

202 months

Friday 27th January 2012
quotequote all
dvs_dave said:
+1 for Air NZ.
+ 2 flew with them to LA in 2010, I can recommend row 56 if you're in cattle class on their 747s, from memory the seat selector on their website gives you the seat pitch for each seat and that was the row I found with the most legroom.

Edit
Hmmm, just been on seatguru.com and they reckon that they are now using 777-300s on the LHR-LAX route instead of the 747-400s so the info I posted may not be of much use to you.

Edited by BigS on Friday 27th January 09:41

Nickyboy

Original Poster:

6,823 posts

263 months

Friday 27th January 2012
quotequote all
Many thanks

Their 747 fleet has been retired now so its the 777-300 for long haul. Their seating plan looks good however, they have the 2 seats at the tail similar to the 747s did.

Jimbo.

4,212 posts

218 months

Friday 27th January 2012
quotequote all
Flew to Auckland via LA: couldn't fault them smile

badgers_back

513 posts

215 months

Saturday 28th January 2012
quotequote all
Very procedure driven and rule based, dollies are witches for it, I fly Singapore who seem to understand what a service culture is.

Hooli

32,278 posts

229 months

Saturday 28th January 2012
quotequote all
Nickyboy said:
more lag room than most
Is that a comfy place to sit during flight delays?

Nickyboy

Original Poster:

6,823 posts

263 months

Saturday 28th January 2012
quotequote all
Hooli said:
Is that a comfy place to sit during flight delays?
actually thought it was where prisoners waited but still smile

uncinqsix

3,239 posts

239 months

Saturday 28th January 2012
quotequote all
10 abreast economy in their 777-300s. Not pleasant. I certainly noticed the narrower seats when I flew on one of them last.

If you get the (9 abreast) 777-200 or the 747 it isn't so bad. Service is normally pretty good. The business seats are nice if you can afford it...