Motorists to be hit with £100 speeding fines - Ken Clarke
Motorists to be hit with £100 speeding fines - Ken Clarke
Author
Discussion

0a

Original Poster:

24,138 posts

223 months

Monday 30th January 2012
quotequote all
Motorists to be hit with £100 speeding fines to support victims - Ken Clarke

Telegraph said:
Motorists face a huge hike in speeding fines to as much as £100 to help fill a funding gap for victims of crime, Kenneth Clarke revealed yesterday.

Drivers could see standard £60 fines increase by 60 per cent with £20 of the extra income being ploughed in to victim services, even though there is no direct victim in many motoring offences.

And those who go to court to challenge speeding tickets or for more serious driving offences could pay up to £120 in to the programme.

mackay45

832 posts

200 months

Monday 30th January 2012
quotequote all
It is £60 at the moment right?

It's the points that scare me, not the fine. Double it and get rid of the points and I would be a happy man (as long as that meant you no longer had to inform insurance co).

(Above is hypothetical as I never speed).

0a

Original Poster:

24,138 posts

223 months

Monday 30th January 2012
quotequote all
The points are, I agree, the worst part. However a 60% rise hardly sits well with TORIES END 'WAR ON MOTORISTS'. It makes one rather cynical to say the least.

Kozy

3,169 posts

247 months

Monday 30th January 2012
quotequote all
Superb.

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

284 months

Monday 30th January 2012
quotequote all
Oh, so it IS a tax, then...?

What happened to the the war against the motorist is over policy...?

Lucas Ayde

4,156 posts

197 months

Monday 30th January 2012
quotequote all
It's typical 'nickel and diming' tactics of the sort that governments everywhere use when they need cash but don't want to be seen to raise taxes.

Speeding is a potentially massively lucrative cash cow for the government as everyone does it frequently due to the stupidly low arbitrary limits that are set. It's a dead easy 'crime' to detect since you simply set a speed and observe someone going faster than the posted limit. Job done, crime figures improved and money in the bank.

The problem is that raising the fines will be self defeating as it'll probably result in many people going slower so they'd need to improve detection rates to keep their numbers up. However, if they are much more effective in detecting speeders they risk killing the goose that laid the golden egg as 12 points - 4 offences or possibly less - and the person is off the road for a year.

I would suspect we will shortly see changes to reduce the number of points you get for speeding in tandem with much higher fines or even have speeding offences with zero points but a fine instead, for being just slightly over the limit.

Easy enough to sell to the braindead general public as being 'for the safety of the children' or some such tosh and keeps the money coming in to keep our elite in the manner to which they have become accustomed.


KingNothing

3,339 posts

182 months

Monday 30th January 2012
quotequote all
Funding gap for victims of crime? I know, how about you fill the funding gap for victims of crime by taking the money off actual convicted scumbag criminals i.e. burglars, ABH/GBH assaulters etc. and if they ain't got any money, none of this paltry £5 payment per week for 3 years stuff, seize anything and everything non-essential to them to fill up any shortfall? Ohhh no, that's not as easy as raping people who want to travel at 80 on a motorway, because you know they can and will pay.

nottyash

4,671 posts

224 months

Monday 30th January 2012
quotequote all
The sooner that fat useless prick retires the bettermad

AlpineWhite

2,164 posts

224 months

Monday 30th January 2012
quotequote all
mybrainhurts said:
Oh, so it IS a tax, then...?

What happened to the the war against the motorist is over policy...?
This!

anonymous-user

83 months

Monday 30th January 2012
quotequote all
Hey I've been a victim of crime before, where's my free money?

DanDC5

20,008 posts

196 months

Monday 30th January 2012
quotequote all
mackay45 said:
It is £60 at the moment right?

It's the points that scare me, not the fine. Double it and get rid of the points and I would be a happy man (as long as that meant you no longer had to inform insurance co).

(Above is hypothetical as I never speed).
Isn't that similar to how the yanks do it? They just issue tickets/fines but don't have to inform their insurance.

At least that's what I thought anyway. I'd be all for that.

psychoR1

1,113 posts

216 months

Monday 30th January 2012
quotequote all
I thought speeding was the victimless crime?

Fleckers

2,880 posts

230 months

Monday 30th January 2012
quotequote all
nottyash said:
The sooner that fat useless prick retires the bettermad
bit unkind to fat useless pricks to lump them in same bracket as Ken Clarke if you ask me


call it £200 a pop and I will forgo the points......