Indian Fighter contract goes to France
Discussion
Apparently some Indian guy is walking round with a lot of French cash in his back pocket.
I don't understand why the UK govt doesn't understand that if you want to deal in these countries, it's not about distributing "aid" money, it's about paying the guy signing the document to buy them.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-1680953...
I don't understand why the UK govt doesn't understand that if you want to deal in these countries, it's not about distributing "aid" money, it's about paying the guy signing the document to buy them.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-1680953...
A lex said:
ANY country with Space and Defence programs shouldn't be receiving aid money in the first place!!
That's another story though I guess.
Add Nuclear to that list too. It does seem strange that we send "aid" money to these seemingly prosperous countries. Post-colonial guilt perhaps? (Ineffectual) business deals?That's another story though I guess.
No real reason to believe that the French paid them a backhander. One reason not to think so is that no matter which deal the Indians had gone fro a French company would have been the main beneficiary.
EADs makes over 50% of the Typhoon and though those factories may be in Spain and Germany the company is French.
EADs makes over 50% of the Typhoon and though those factories may be in Spain and Germany the company is French.
I think that the belief that aid is a legitimate backhander is being taken a bit too literally.
There is no doubt that our contributions to foreign countries do put us in a more favourable light, but it doesn't mean that we are entitled to win every worthwhile contract going. Hopefully this will go some way to dispelling the myth that foreign aid has nothing to do with philanthropy, and everything to do with defense contracts.
Having said that, I do think our foreign aid program does need to be examined.
There is no doubt that our contributions to foreign countries do put us in a more favourable light, but it doesn't mean that we are entitled to win every worthwhile contract going. Hopefully this will go some way to dispelling the myth that foreign aid has nothing to do with philanthropy, and everything to do with defense contracts.
Having said that, I do think our foreign aid program does need to be examined.
ewenm said:
A lex said:
ANY country with Space and Defence programs shouldn't be receiving aid money in the first place!!
That's another story though I guess.
Add Nuclear to that list too. It does seem strange that we send "aid" money to these seemingly prosperous countries. Post-colonial guilt perhaps? (Ineffectual) business deals?That's another story though I guess.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff




