Indian Fighter contract goes to France
Indian Fighter contract goes to France
Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

85 months

Wednesday 1st February 2012
quotequote all
Apparently some Indian guy is walking round with a lot of French cash in his back pocket.

I don't understand why the UK govt doesn't understand that if you want to deal in these countries, it's not about distributing "aid" money, it's about paying the guy signing the document to buy them.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-1680953...


s1962a

7,696 posts

193 months

Wednesday 1st February 2012
quotequote all
Didn't BAE get in trouble a couple of years ago for bribery during a Saudi arms deal? I believe the case was dropped against them so maybe it is easy to get away with it.

TheD

3,144 posts

230 months

Wednesday 1st February 2012
quotequote all
I don't understand why we need to send them a billion pound in aid when they have so much cash for defense and a space program. It could well be percieved as a backdoor bribe though that has backfired. Which is what I personally think. It seems they have greased the wrong pockets.

Cledus Snow

2,147 posts

219 months

Wednesday 1st February 2012
quotequote all
I blame the Top Gear Christmas special.

Soovy

35,829 posts

302 months

Wednesday 1st February 2012
quotequote all
Typical French.

Not as worried as the British about "Compliance issues"

onyx39

11,349 posts

181 months

Wednesday 1st February 2012
quotequote all

dandarez

14,041 posts

314 months

Wednesday 1st February 2012
quotequote all
Cledus Snow said:
I blame the Top Gear Christmas special.
biggrin

ewenm

28,506 posts

276 months

Wednesday 1st February 2012
quotequote all
A lex said:
ANY country with Space and Defence programs shouldn't be receiving aid money in the first place!!

That's another story though I guess.
Add Nuclear to that list too. It does seem strange that we send "aid" money to these seemingly prosperous countries. Post-colonial guilt perhaps? (Ineffectual) business deals?

Mikeyboy

5,018 posts

266 months

Wednesday 1st February 2012
quotequote all
No real reason to believe that the French paid them a backhander. One reason not to think so is that no matter which deal the Indians had gone fro a French company would have been the main beneficiary.

EADs makes over 50% of the Typhoon and though those factories may be in Spain and Germany the company is French.

MX7

7,902 posts

205 months

Wednesday 1st February 2012
quotequote all
I think that the belief that aid is a legitimate backhander is being taken a bit too literally.

There is no doubt that our contributions to foreign countries do put us in a more favourable light, but it doesn't mean that we are entitled to win every worthwhile contract going. Hopefully this will go some way to dispelling the myth that foreign aid has nothing to do with philanthropy, and everything to do with defense contracts.

Having said that, I do think our foreign aid program does need to be examined.

onyx39

11,349 posts

181 months

Wednesday 1st February 2012
quotequote all
MX7 said:
Having said that, I do think our foreign aid program does need to be examined.
I agree totally, particulary when we cannot afford to run our our own armed forces, but they are spending billions expanding theirs!

Lost soul

8,712 posts

213 months

Wednesday 1st February 2012
quotequote all
It has not gone to the French , it just the first round

Fittster

20,120 posts

244 months

Wednesday 1st February 2012
quotequote all
Can someone explain why the taxpayer should pay bribe in the form of aid to support a private company?


onyx39

11,349 posts

181 months

Wednesday 1st February 2012
quotequote all
Fittster said:
Can someone explain why the taxpayer should pay bribe in the form of aid to support a private company?
Jobs presumably.

Hooli

32,278 posts

231 months

Wednesday 1st February 2012
quotequote all
ewenm said:
A lex said:
ANY country with Space and Defence programs shouldn't be receiving aid money in the first place!!

That's another story though I guess.
Add Nuclear to that list too. It does seem strange that we send "aid" money to these seemingly prosperous countries. Post-colonial guilt perhaps? (Ineffectual) business deals?
Indeed, if they can afford such programs then they don't need aid. Besides our tax is meant to fix this country not others.

Eric Mc

125,859 posts

296 months

Wednesday 1st February 2012
quotequote all
Has the order been placed then?

Lost soul

8,712 posts

213 months

Wednesday 1st February 2012
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Has the order been placed then?
No , Dave got asked about it in PMQ and said he would put his full force behind us getting the deal so it can not have been smile

Eric Mc

125,859 posts

296 months

Wednesday 1st February 2012
quotequote all
Lost soul said:
Eric Mc said:
Has the order been placed then?
No , Dave got asked about it in PMQ and said he would put his full force behind us getting the deal so it can not have been smile
I didn't think so.

The thread title is 100% inaccurate then.

MX7

7,902 posts

205 months

Wednesday 1st February 2012
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
I didn't think so.

The thread title is 100% inaccurate then.
In the OP's defence, so is the BBC headline.

Lost soul

8,712 posts

213 months

Wednesday 1st February 2012
quotequote all
From the BBC site

"A spokesman for the Eurofighter Typhoon consortium told the BBC they were disappointed, but stressed that the decision was not final and negotiations were still going on. "