73 dead at a football match
Author
Discussion

br d

Original Poster:

9,072 posts

257 months

Wednesday 1st February 2012
quotequote all
Egypt.
Local rivals apparently.




FarleyRusk

1,036 posts

242 months

Wednesday 1st February 2012
quotequote all
br d said:
Egypt.
Local rivals apparently.
Strange hoe "Egypt " and "Eejit" sound so similar....

thinfourth2

32,414 posts

235 months

Wednesday 1st February 2012
quotequote all
Killing each other over a game of football

Welcome to the civilised world

dudleybloke

20,553 posts

217 months

Wednesday 1st February 2012
quotequote all
Club bosses are in de-nile about the situation.

Kays vRS

2,006 posts

207 months

carmonk

7,910 posts

218 months

Wednesday 1st February 2012
quotequote all
Taking advantage of their new-found freedoms, it seems. They must be proud of themselves, though, in a single match they appear to have surpassed the the soccer violence death toll of the entire Western world since the game began.

ExChrispy Porker

17,747 posts

259 months

Wednesday 1st February 2012
quotequote all
Hillsborough?
Heysel?

scotal

8,751 posts

310 months

Wednesday 1st February 2012
quotequote all
carmonk said:
Taking advantage of their new-found freedoms, it seems. They must be proud of themselves, though, in a single match they appear to have surpassed the the soccer violence death toll of the entire Western world since the game began.
Not heard of Hillborough then?
Or Heysel, Or Ibrox.

And those are just ones I can think of.

escort90

3,658 posts

202 months

Wednesday 1st February 2012
quotequote all
scotal said:
Not heard of Hillborough then?
Or Heysel, Or Ibrox.

And those are just ones I can think of.
Hillsborough - over crowding
Ibrox - a stand collapsed

How can you compare these to what has happened here?

scotal

8,751 posts

310 months

Wednesday 1st February 2012
quotequote all
escort90 said:
Hillsborough - over crowding
Ibrox - a stand collapsed

How can you compare these to what has happened here?
"Officials say most of the deaths were caused by concussions, deep cuts to the heads and suffocation from the stampede."

From the article above.
Both Hillsborough and Ibrox 1971 (not when the stand collapsed) involved people being killed by suffocation in stampedes. At Hillsborough that was largely due to an illprepard stadium and fans rushing the turnstiles.


escort90

3,658 posts

202 months

Wednesday 1st February 2012
quotequote all
yes but the stampedes in the cases of hillsborough and ibrox where not caused by violence as is the case in egypt. Is that not the point in the original post?

carmonk

7,910 posts

218 months

Wednesday 1st February 2012
quotequote all
scotal said:
carmonk said:
Taking advantage of their new-found freedoms, it seems. They must be proud of themselves, though, in a single match they appear to have surpassed the the soccer violence death toll of the entire Western world since the game began.
Not heard of Hillborough then?
Or Heysel, Or Ibrox.

And those are just ones I can think of.
It's Hillsborough, you can't even spell it. The conclusion was "...the British Judicial system has consistently found that violence or hooliganism played no part whatsoever in the disaster".

Ibrox was plain overcrowding and caused when some people fell over accidentally

How about having a clue before you post such crap?

Eric Mc

125,859 posts

296 months

Wednesday 1st February 2012
quotequote all
Heysel definitely had a hooligan element to it.

Einion Yrth

19,575 posts

275 months

Thursday 2nd February 2012
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Heysel definitely had a hooligan element to it.
But also an element of the stadium being unfit for purpose; that wall should not have been in a condition whereby it would collapse.

Eric Mc

125,859 posts

296 months

Thursday 2nd February 2012
quotequote all
Einion Yrth said:
Eric Mc said:
Heysel definitely had a hooligan element to it.
But also an element of the stadium being unfit for purpose; that wall should not have been in a condition whereby it would collapse.
Of course. As in many such incidents, there were a combination of factors. But their is no doubt that it was the carry on between the fans that prompted the panic and then the disaster.


Hugo a Gogo

23,438 posts

264 months

Thursday 2nd February 2012
quotequote all
I heard they were angry about being ripped off in some sort of pyramid scheme


anyway, people are not animals, despite what the daily wail will tell you, they do not stampede

easter

2,366 posts

223 months

Thursday 2nd February 2012
quotequote all
idiots

Greenwich Ross

1,219 posts

204 months

Thursday 2nd February 2012
quotequote all
In happier news, the average IQ in Eygpt has now gone up a few more points.

Muntu

7,687 posts

230 months

Thursday 2nd February 2012
quotequote all
Greenwich Ross said:
In happier news, the average IQ in Eygpt has now gone up a few more points.
hehe

TwigtheWonderkid

49,231 posts

181 months

Thursday 2nd February 2012
quotequote all
carmonk said:
It's Hillsborough, you can't even spell it. The conclusion was "...the British Judicial system has consistently found that violence or hooliganism played no part whatsoever in the disaster".
Yes, they did say that. But the fact remains that it wouldn't have happened if that many people had turned up on that day at Hillsborough for the filming of an episode of Antiques Roadshow!! Or to see a pop concert. Or a rugby match even. It could only have happened at a football fixture.

Hillsborough was down to the behaviour of many football fans in this country, who drink to much before the match and then bundle in 5 mins before kick off. And become aggresive if they get held up and are going to miss the kick off. I know because I'm a football fan.

That combined with an inept police force, that's what lead to Hillsborough.