OCD in Watches?
Author
Discussion

Ikemi

Original Poster:

8,610 posts

236 months

Friday 3rd February 2012
quotequote all
It's very quiet in work at the moment, so I'm spending some looking around at various new watches coming out soon! I've just discovered a rather nice 'phantom' TAG Formula 1, which is soon to be released. It's lovely, except for one small minor detail ...



The hour markers! frown If you look at the '11' and '1' hour markers, they are longer in comparison to the other markers, which are cut off due to the chrono dials. However, for an aesthetically pleasing dial, you'd expect long hour markers at '5' and '7' ... No. There is one long hour marker at '8' and the date window at '4'. It just throws off the balanced look of the dial and for me, would annoy me constantly! If only they had just settled for small markers all round! hehe

Do you have any OCD tendencies when it comes to watches? Which watches annoy you? What would put you off or continually draw your attention to the point where you'd need to flip it? smile

Easty-5

1,423 posts

221 months

Friday 3rd February 2012
quotequote all
Bell & Ross screws. Although it wouldn't stop me owning one.

I hate misaligned bezels.

JAM35F

1,268 posts

283 months

Friday 3rd February 2012
quotequote all
That bezel would annoy me, some numbers face inwards, some face outwards. Need to be consistent to aid readablity as you turn it.

Ikemi

Original Poster:

8,610 posts

236 months

Friday 3rd February 2012
quotequote all
JAM35F said:
That bezel would annoy me, some numbers face inwards, some face outwards. Need to be consistent to aid readablity as you turn it.
Good point! I didn't notice that! wobble

Laser Sag

2,860 posts

274 months

Friday 3rd February 2012
quotequote all
I always thought that that type of outer bexel was for measuring speed and so would be fixed. Please be gentle with me if that is total c**p.

toasty

8,419 posts

251 months

Friday 3rd February 2012
quotequote all
The hour markers don't bother me, they're long where there's a gap and short where there isn't.

Ikemi

Original Poster:

8,610 posts

236 months

Friday 3rd February 2012
quotequote all
toasty said:
The hour markers don't bother me, they're long where there's a gap and short where there isn't.
Yeah, but it's not symmetrical! They should've done a long hour marker at '4' and moved the date to '6', cutting into the bottom chronograph dial ... Much better! tongue out

ETA: Or remove the date entirely? scratchchin

Edited by Ikemi on Friday 3rd February 13:53

R.P.M

1,982 posts

252 months

Friday 3rd February 2012
quotequote all
Very very nearly pulled the trigger. But after starring at it for over twenty minutes in the A/D I just couldn't live with it.

Such a shame.


bigrich4

713 posts

188 months

Friday 3rd February 2012
quotequote all
Ikemi said:
I quite like that myself

toasty

8,419 posts

251 months

Friday 3rd February 2012
quotequote all
Ikemi said:
toasty said:
The hour markers don't bother me, they're long where there's a gap and short where there isn't.
Yeah, but it's not symmetrical! They should've done a long hour marker at '4' and moved the date to '6', cutting into the bottom chronograph dial ... Much better! tongue out

ETA: Or remove the date entirely? scratchchin

Edited by Ikemi on Friday 3rd February 13:53
Ah but for symmetry they'd need another sub dial on the top half. I think it's designed to be asymmetrical. Either way, I prefer the IWC but the 12 and 6 niggle with me.

Ikemi

Original Poster:

8,610 posts

236 months

Friday 3rd February 2012
quotequote all
toasty said:
ah but for symmetry they'd need another sub dial on the top half. I think it's designed to be asymmetrical. Either way, I prefer the IWC but the 12 and 6 niggle with me.
This crude GIMP alteration makes the dial more symmetrical ... No need for another sub dial smile I agree with the IWC remarks though!


amnesia182

486 posts

193 months

Friday 3rd February 2012
quotequote all
I don't understand why Breitling bothered to put just a bit of a six on this...


johnbaz

505 posts

209 months

Friday 3rd February 2012
quotequote all
I have an OCD with watches but not the same type...

I need more, MORE I said!!!!!




John banghead

bing

1,946 posts

269 months

Friday 3rd February 2012
quotequote all
R.P.M said:
Very very nearly pulled the trigger. But after starring at it for over twenty minutes in the A/D I just couldn't live with it.

Such a shame.

What was your issue with that IWC?

I'm torn between that and a spitfire chrono, the only things I find odd about that Portuguese is that fact that the 12 and 6 are chopped off and there is no date?

CardShark

4,264 posts

210 months

Friday 3rd February 2012
quotequote all
I don't mind the asymmetrical design, most watches with a day/date are asymmnetrical, it's the bezel numerals that would do my head in. A pure example of fashion before function.

The IWC is a no no on the basis of it having cut numerals, a shame as otherwise it's a fine looking thing.

Johnbaz - you have a serious problem there! hehe

Edited by CardShark on Friday 3rd February 23:37

rog007

5,832 posts

255 months

Saturday 4th February 2012
quotequote all
johnbaz said:
I have an OCD with watches but not the same type...

I need more, MORE I said!!!!!




John banghead
Is that for real? Honestly?? bow

cslwannabe

1,570 posts

200 months

Saturday 4th February 2012
quotequote all
Know what you mean OP - I was going to buy a CW DBR but couldn't live with the fact that it didn't have minute division lines all the way round. Lovely looking watch and was sorely tempted at 20% off but thought why have a watch and then have to guess the time at certain points each hour.

Danesgate

509 posts

187 months

Saturday 4th February 2012
quotequote all
johnbaz said:
I have an OCD with watches but not the same type...

I need more, MORE I said!!!!!




John banghead
Nice Orange Monster smile

andy tims

5,606 posts

277 months

Saturday 4th February 2012
quotequote all
Sliced numerals can spoil a dial, but a misaligned bezel always looks ste.

Eighteeteewhy

7,259 posts

199 months

Saturday 4th February 2012
quotequote all
bing said:
R.P.M said:
Very very nearly pulled the trigger. But after starring at it for over twenty minutes in the A/D I just couldn't live with it.

Such a shame.

What was your issue with that IWC?

I'm torn between that and a spitfire chrono, the only things I find odd about that Portuguese is that fact that the 12 and 6 are chopped off and there is no date?
The 12 and 6 I guess. It does spoil what is otherwise a stunning watch.

Edited by Eighteeteewhy on Saturday 4th February 10:56