Freelander query
Author
Discussion

jaymzfc

Original Poster:

157 posts

186 months

Monday 6th February 2012
quotequote all
Hi, thinking of buying the wife a freelander circa 2001-2004 5 door model, ideally a td4, thing is it's not easy to find one of these in Malta where i live.
I have come across a few 1.8 petrol and was wondering are they really that bad? if the cyl head gasket does go is the fix easy or an expensive job, and whats the job like to change it over to a td4 ?
I had considered buying a UK import since the prices in the UK are cheap compared but the import and license fee killed off that idea.


badlands1

845 posts

177 months

Friday 10th February 2012
quotequote all
Please don't buy a 1.8 petrol.

Please please please DON'T.

Very underpowered, huge money to run and they (ours0 went wrong every 36 seconds.
That thing cost me £25k new as well.

mad4amanda

2,410 posts

188 months

Friday 10th February 2012
quotequote all
Ive been warned off even the TD4 by the local specialist still saving for the Freelander 2.

badlands1

845 posts

177 months

Saturday 11th February 2012
quotequote all
mad4amanda said:
Ive been warned off even the TD4 by the local specialist still saving for the Freelander 2.
I would agree with ^^^

gowmonster

2,471 posts

191 months

Saturday 11th February 2012
quotequote all
I've had one, don't touch it, get something like a Nissan Xtrail or something japanese.

we had our 1.8 for a year with full service history.
had problems with:
rear door seal.
doors not unlocking properly
rear diff mounts
rear diff
clutch
gearbox
airbox and kinglead issues leading to cutouts while driving.
headgasket issues
ignition switch breaking resulting in starting issues.

but apart from that it was fine, slow and thirsty, ~30mpg on the motorway run.

older cars are always going to have problems but these had them from factory....

Peely

902 posts

243 months

Saturday 11th February 2012
quotequote all
Nissan XTrail = twice the car for the money !!

stuwalsh

225 posts

177 months

Saturday 11th February 2012
quotequote all
I,ve got a 54 plate Td4 Auto sport now imported to Crete. A wonderful car, the only glitch has been a turbo pipe (note a BMW item!) which was a Euro 700 job for a Euro50 part!

Great car, good on fuel and comfy for the occasional pan euro drive back to the UK.

Auto reccomended as no viscous coupling problems. Import of a UK vehicle within the EU is no problem but you MUST have owned it for a minimum of 6mths prior. Also you must obtain a certificate of EU Conformity from Land Rover.

jaymzfc

Original Poster:

157 posts

186 months

Sunday 19th February 2012
quotequote all
Thanks for all your input guys, td4 versions are over priced in malta as are jap second hand. Went to see an 03 petrol with 60k in mint condition always serviced at landrover and according to my mechanic the engine looks ok. At the end of the day he said if it all goes pop go to the uk get a td4 engine /wireloom and well do the swap. I'll keep u lot posted. Tks again.

gowmonster

2,471 posts

191 months

Sunday 19th February 2012
quotequote all
Why not goto the UK and get a td4 or a xtrail? Surly you'll save money in the long run. Remember and post back how horribly wrong it goes.

jaymzfc

Original Poster:

157 posts

186 months

Tuesday 13th March 2012
quotequote all
Quick update just bought a 02 td4 freelander it's animport from the uk and looks in great cond. happy lad here. wink
Tks guys
James

stuwalsh

225 posts

177 months

Tuesday 13th March 2012
quotequote all
Heres mine!!

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

214 months

Wednesday 14th March 2012
quotequote all
jaymzfc said:
Hi, thinking of buying the wife a freelander circa 2001-2004 5 door model, ideally a td4, thing is it's not easy to find one of these in Malta where i live.
I have come across a few 1.8 petrol and was wondering are they really that bad? if the cyl head gasket does go is the fix easy or an expensive job, and whats the job like to change it over to a td4 ?
I had considered buying a UK import since the prices in the UK are cheap compared but the import and license fee killed off that idea.
My Mum had a 1.8i up until just before Christmas when it was in a raod accident. The engine actually goes very well in the Freelander and feels far more beefy and grunty than a 1.8, it's not as revvy as you'd think, although moves quite well for a 4x4 if you do thrash it.

HG failure is an issue with these and more prone in the Freelander due to the vehicle weight and people revving the motor more when cold. That said, if repaired correctly it 'shouldn't' be a frequent problem and costs no more than doing a cambelt on a V6 Pug (less infact).

There are some things you can do to help prevent it happening, change the T-stat either for the later type or I believe there are conversion kits so it measures engine water temp and not influenced by the cold rad temp (as is the standard design). Using metal locating dowels, the proper stretch bolts and head gasket.

Then make sure the rest of the system is up to par, a small rad or heater leak will produce similar symptoms to HG failure and can actually cause them.

Personally I wouldn't shy away from a 1.8, but you do need to buy with the expectation of doing a HG on it at some point. Repeated HG failures would indicate someone is not actually fixing it properly or there is something else wrong causing it.

As a side note, while the K Series has the public domain reputation, it is not the only engine to suffer HG issues and is indeed not the most prone either. It's just the most publicized (likely due to the number of K-Series engines in use and the stereotypical Brit way of dissing ourselves).


While I suspect it is possible to convert a 1.8 to a Td4 I think it would likely be a lot of work and all up cost of doing so would likely far exceed any HG replacement costs you are realistically likely to see (if done correctly).


If you want a diesel don't neglect the L-Series though, they are a fine engine in their own right, just not quite as refined as the Td4. Power is down slightly, but not a huge amount and they can easily be remapped to exceed the performance of a stock Td4. The L-Series is a proven durable and reliable engine.

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

214 months

Wednesday 14th March 2012
quotequote all
badlands1 said:
Please don't buy a 1.8 petrol.

Please please please DON'T.

Very underpowered, huge money to run and they (ours0 went wrong every 36 seconds.
That thing cost me £25k new as well.
Underpowered compared to what?

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

214 months

Wednesday 14th March 2012
quotequote all
Peely said:
Nissan XTrail = twice the car for the money !!
But bigger, bulkier, not as nice to drive, no good off road, don't go as well as some claim and they rust and still break down too.

A.J.M

8,340 posts

210 months

Wednesday 14th March 2012
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
jaymzfc said:
Hi, thinking of buying the wife a freelander circa 2001-2004 5 door model, ideally a td4, thing is it's not easy to find one of these in Malta where i live.
I have come across a few 1.8 petrol and was wondering are they really that bad? if the cyl head gasket does go is the fix easy or an expensive job, and whats the job like to change it over to a td4 ?
I had considered buying a UK import since the prices in the UK are cheap compared but the import and license fee killed off that idea.
My Mum had a 1.8i up until just before Christmas when it was in a raod accident. The engine actually goes very well in the Freelander and feels far more beefy and grunty than a 1.8, it's not as revvy as you'd think, although moves quite well for a 4x4 if you do thrash it.

HG failure is an issue with these and more prone in the Freelander due to the vehicle weight and people revving the motor more when cold. That said, if repaired correctly it 'shouldn't' be a frequent problem and costs no more than doing a cambelt on a V6 Pug (less infact).

There are some things you can do to help prevent it happening, change the T-stat either for the later type or I believe there are conversion kits so it measures engine water temp and not influenced by the cold rad temp (as is the standard design). Using metal locating dowels, the proper stretch bolts and head gasket.

Then make sure the rest of the system is up to par, a small rad or heater leak will produce similar symptoms to HG failure and can actually cause them.

Personally I wouldn't shy away from a 1.8, but you do need to buy with the expectation of doing a HG on it at some point. Repeated HG failures would indicate someone is not actually fixing it properly or there is something else wrong causing it.

As a side note, while the K Series has the public domain reputation, it is not the only engine to suffer HG issues and is indeed not the most prone either. It's just the most publicized (likely due to the number of K-Series engines in use and the stereotypical Brit way of dissing ourselves).


While I suspect it is possible to convert a 1.8 to a Td4 I think it would likely be a lot of work and all up cost of doing so would likely far exceed any HG replacement costs you are realistically likely to see (if done correctly).


If you want a diesel don't neglect the L-Series though, they are a fine engine in their own right, just not quite as refined as the Td4. Power is down slightly, but not a huge amount and they can easily be remapped to exceed the performance of a stock Td4. The L-Series is a proven durable and reliable engine.
All good info, but he has already bought a TD4...

For the td4, there are a few mods to make it better.

1. Blank the EGR valve. £45.
2. Replace all engine hoses with uprated silicone ones as the standard ones leak/split over time. £100-120.
3. Replace the crankcase breather for the BMW vortex oil seperator. £23.

These 3 mods will help the engine and give better fuel economy. If you want to go further then you can get a tuning kit sent to you from the uk, it's a synergy2 box and gives 10 different tunes for power/torque and an eco mode for better fuel economy.

Otherwise, make sure the tyres are all good, the best ones are on the back, and give it a full service and dont use cheap oil. smile

Look after it and you will have a decent car.

Peely

902 posts

243 months

Wednesday 14th March 2012
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
Peely said:
Nissan XTrail = twice the car for the money !!
But bigger, bulkier, not as nice to drive, no good off road, don't go as well as some claim and they rust and still break down too.
Please tell me you're joking ?!!

Bigger, yes = more room inside !

No good off road ? Where have you been living for the last 10yrs, they're brilliant off road, in fact one of the best unless you're comparing it to a Defender/Disco !

Don't go as well as some claim ? Had one for 3yrs with the 170bhp motor, wasn't much could touch it to be honest, never broke down, in fact visited the dealer twice for a service, everything worked and still did 3yrs later when sold !
Everything rusts if not looked after and they are no different !

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

214 months

Wednesday 14th March 2012
quotequote all
Peely said:
Please tell me you're joking ?!!

Bigger, yes = more room inside !

No good off road ? Where have you been living for the last 10yrs, they're brilliant off road, in fact one of the best unless you're comparing it to a Defender/Disco !

Don't go as well as some claim ? Had one for 3yrs with the 170bhp motor, wasn't much could touch it to be honest, never broke down, in fact visited the dealer twice for a service, everything worked and still did 3yrs later when sold !
Everything rusts if not looked after and they are no different !
I won't say I was unimpressed with the X-Trail but I certainly wasn't as wowed by it as the media led me to believe I would be.

As I said above my Mum had a 1.8i Freelander that was written off, so earlier this year we went on the hunt for a new 4x4. The X-Trail was on the list, so we drove one. I admit I really liked the seat fabric and it was airy inside. But it didn't go as well as I thought it would and handled no better than a Freelander. It also didn't feel like a 4x4, which to me seems somewhat pointless, if I want a car I'd buy a car. If I want a 4x4 then that's what I expect to get.

As for the off road ability, I admit I didn't take it off road, but having now driven one and crawled under one I wouldn't through choice take one where I'd happily take a Freelander. A TCS equipped Freelander will pretty much the same places a Disco or Defender will if driven properly, better so on some terrain if you are comparing to non TCS Disco's and Defenders. In fact I can attest to this as I have taken a Freelander such places and I wouldn't dream of trying to use an X-Trail on the same terrain.

Steffan

10,362 posts

252 months

Wednesday 14th March 2012
quotequote all
UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES buy a 1800 K series. You have been warned.

The cars are all very poorly assembled many items will fail.

If you can afford the repairs and are lucky the cars are brilliant transport.

Grace, Space and Pace. In profusion. Wonderful drive and totally surefooted.

Superbly accommodating and easy to drive. Not bad on fuel either.

But expect repairs: you will need them.

Peely

902 posts

243 months

Wednesday 14th March 2012
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
won't say I was unimpressed with the X-Trail but I certainly wasn't as wowed by it as the media led me to believe I would be.

As I said above my Mum had a 1.8i Freelander that was written off, so earlier this year we went on the hunt for a new 4x4. The X-Trail was on the list, so we drove one. I admit I really liked the seat fabric and it was airy inside. But it didn't go as well as I thought it would and handled no better than a Freelander. It also didn't feel like a 4x4, which to me seems somewhat pointless, if I want a car I'd buy a car. If I want a 4x4 then that's what I expect to get.
All depends on which model you are comparing, early model Xtrails did have a more 'lush' car like feeling, but even those where decent off road vehicles, would run forever and as you have already mentioned, never failed to get a good press report.


300bhp/ton said:
As for the off road ability, I admit I didn't take it off road, but having now driven one and crawled under one I wouldn't through choice take one where I'd happily take a Freelander. A TCS equipped Freelander will pretty much the same places a Disco or Defender will if driven properly, better so on some terrain if you are comparing to non TCS Disco's and Defenders. In fact I can attest to this as I have taken a Freelander such places and I wouldn't dream of trying to use an X-Trail on the same terrain.
The new one's are even better, better engine, better gearbox and all the TCS you could ever need, try one a little more next time, you might surprise yourself !

By the way, no Freelander will go where a Defender/Disco will go, ............there is no substitute for ground clearance ! wink

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

214 months

Wednesday 14th March 2012
quotequote all
Peely said:
300bhp/ton said:
won't say I was unimpressed with the X-Trail but I certainly wasn't as wowed by it as the media led me to believe I would be.

As I said above my Mum had a 1.8i Freelander that was written off, so earlier this year we went on the hunt for a new 4x4. The X-Trail was on the list, so we drove one. I admit I really liked the seat fabric and it was airy inside. But it didn't go as well as I thought it would and handled no better than a Freelander. It also didn't feel like a 4x4, which to me seems somewhat pointless, if I want a car I'd buy a car. If I want a 4x4 then that's what I expect to get.
All depends on which model you are comparing, early model Xtrails did have a more 'lush' car like feeling, but even those where decent off road vehicles, would run forever and as you have already mentioned, never failed to get a good press report.
I forgot which diesel engine it was now that I drove. As said I wasn't disappointed in it (although my Mum was). But for me it seemed the perfect mix of being able to do nothing I'd want from a vehicle, it wasn't a 4x4 and it wasn't a car.

Peely said:
300bhp/ton said:
As for the off road ability, I admit I didn't take it off road, but having now driven one and crawled under one I wouldn't through choice take one where I'd happily take a Freelander. A TCS equipped Freelander will pretty much the same places a Disco or Defender will if driven properly, better so on some terrain if you are comparing to non TCS Disco's and Defenders. In fact I can attest to this as I have taken a Freelander such places and I wouldn't dream of trying to use an X-Trail on the same terrain.
The new one's are even better, better engine, better gearbox and all the TCS you could ever need, try one a little more next time, you might surprise yourself !
Brand new where not within the budget by a long way. Certainly the first two gens don't have TCS, not an off road biased one. If the current variant does, then great. smile

Peely said:
By the way, no Freelander will go where a Defender/Disco will go, ............there is no substitute for ground clearance ! wink
I would beg to differ. Clearance is important, but there are many types of off roading. Also a 2" lift and some bigger tyres on a Freelander will give it very good clearance. What separates it from other soft roaders is the TCS system. It doesn't need to keep all the wheels on the ground with long suspension travel to maintain traction. Being crossed axled will catch a Disco 1 or non TCS Defender out with ease. Or on slippery surfaces, without locking axle diffs (which Landies don't have) or an off road biased TCS they can't spin all 4 wheels, they'll spin 2 or 3 at a time with the centre diff lock engaged.

Dry conditions, mild AT tyres (M&S rated) Jeep Cherokee - live alxes - very similar to Landy in many ways. Stuck at the first obstacle. I admit stock clearance on the Cherokee is pants too though, but even so. It totally failed at the off section I was tackling. 2" lift and a set of MT's later it did as well as any Land Rover I've owned or driven.

Freelander 1, 100% standard on winter tyres. Very wet. Breezed over all the same obstacles the Jeep failed on the dry.