A few from this morning
Author
Discussion

GetCarter

Original Poster:

31,239 posts

308 months

Sunday 19th February 2012
quotequote all
Worth a click to see full size IMHO

(Top one with C. polarizer)








Vieste

10,532 posts

189 months

Sunday 19th February 2012
quotequote all
Very good.

MartinP

1,275 posts

267 months

Sunday 19th February 2012
quotequote all
Lovely!

Adz The Rat

18,852 posts

238 months

Sunday 19th February 2012
quotequote all
Stunning Steve.

fadeaway

1,463 posts

255 months

Sunday 19th February 2012
quotequote all
Thanks for sharing - stunning

CarMac

669 posts

243 months

Sunday 19th February 2012
quotequote all
Lovely! Not jealous at all!

flat-planedCrank

3,697 posts

232 months

Sunday 19th February 2012
quotequote all
These are of adequate quality hehe

flat-planedCrank

3,697 posts

232 months

Sunday 19th February 2012
quotequote all
These are of adequate quality hehe

Laplace

1,091 posts

211 months

Sunday 19th February 2012
quotequote all
Magic!

RJB_666

1,677 posts

224 months

Sunday 19th February 2012
quotequote all
Really nice shots! Thirds my favourite from the bunch.

CarMac

669 posts

243 months

Monday 20th February 2012
quotequote all
Which camera did you use, Steve?

dxbtiger

4,546 posts

202 months

Monday 20th February 2012
quotequote all
Cracking set GC, well done

CarMac said:
Which camera did you use, Steve?
He'll probably make us weep and say it was his phone.....

GetCarter

Original Poster:

31,239 posts

308 months

Monday 20th February 2012
quotequote all
Box Brownie

D3 with 24 - 70 for 1 and 3, Canon S95 for the B&W

Another - D3 at 70mm:


CommanderJameson

22,096 posts

255 months

Monday 20th February 2012
quotequote all
They're depressingly wonderful shots, Steve.

Would you mind sharing a few details? Shutter speed, aperture, etc?

I went out at the weekend and basically made a right pigs ear of things by trying to be a smartarse; from apertures stopped down too much and insufficient ISO (too dark) to wide apertures with relatively slow shutter (massively overexposed), to slow exposures (motion blur). I think out of a hundred-odd pictures there were three that were not horrid.

I felt like just twisting the knob round to "full auto" and never moving it again.

GetCarter

Original Poster:

31,239 posts

308 months

Monday 20th February 2012
quotequote all
CommanderJameson said:
They're depressingly wonderful shots, Steve.

Would you mind sharing a few details? Shutter speed, aperture, etc?

I went out at the weekend and basically made a right pigs ear of things by trying to be a smartarse; from apertures stopped down too much and insufficient ISO (too dark) to wide apertures with relatively slow shutter (massively overexposed), to slow exposures (motion blur). I think out of a hundred-odd pictures there were three that were not horrid.

I felt like just twisting the knob round to "full auto" and never moving it again.
Here's the exif for shot 1. I exposure bracketed 5 frames on each shot - then chose the best exposure (generally -1/3 stop to hold the highlights). In PP (as always) I altered the curves to give it more shadow/highlight.



..and pics 1 and 4 used a circular polarizer to darken the sky/pull out the clouds (and add 3d!)


Edited by GetCarter on Monday 20th February 08:30

markmullen

15,877 posts

263 months

Monday 20th February 2012
quotequote all
Belting shots as always

CommanderJameson

22,096 posts

255 months

Monday 20th February 2012
quotequote all
GetCarter said:
CommanderJameson said:
They're depressingly wonderful shots, Steve.

Would you mind sharing a few details? Shutter speed, aperture, etc?

I went out at the weekend and basically made a right pigs ear of things by trying to be a smartarse; from apertures stopped down too much and insufficient ISO (too dark) to wide apertures with relatively slow shutter (massively overexposed), to slow exposures (motion blur). I think out of a hundred-odd pictures there were three that were not horrid.

I felt like just twisting the knob round to "full auto" and never moving it again.
Here's the exif for shot 1. I exposure bracketed 5 frames on each shot - then chose the best exposure (generally -1/3 stop to hold the highlights). In PP (as always) I altered the curves to give it more shadow/highlight.



..and pics 1 and 4 used a circular polarizer to darken the sky/pull out the clouds (and add 3d!)
Many thanks. I note with interest that you have used a much faster shutter than I was yesterday; I didn't go much quicker than 1/50. And I had the window wide open at f/5.6. I will experiment with speeding things up and using a higher ISO (I had it manually set to 200).

GetCarter

Original Poster:

31,239 posts

308 months

Monday 20th February 2012
quotequote all
Watch out for the ISO... I can make it high as I use Full Frame... if you're on crop fame, I'd keep it 400 or less due to noise.

At 1/50th sec you are quite likely to get camera shake, even the mirror moving might affect sharpness at that speed.

Lenses work at their best 'in the middle' (ie F8 - f10 )... so I *try* and use them there if DOF will allow)

CommanderJameson

22,096 posts

255 months

Monday 20th February 2012
quotequote all
>makes notes<

NJH

3,021 posts

238 months

Monday 20th February 2012
quotequote all
GetCarter said:
Watch out for the ISO... I can make it high as I use Full Frame... if you're on crop fame, I'd keep it 400 or less due to noise.

At 1/50th sec you are quite likely to get camera shake, even the mirror moving might affect sharpness at that speed.

Lenses work at their best 'in the middle' (ie F8 - f10 )... so I *try* and use them there if DOF will allow)
Really really nice pictures, the 3rd one is my favourite due to the warmer light breaking in across the middle.

For a small sensor such as m4/3rds the sweet spot is wider open up around f4 to f5.6.