We need to pull our finger out (as a collective).
Discussion
just been listening to Radio 4 and they had a speaker from Mumsnet on, actually making a good point about energy bills. anyway this got me thinking. why don't they ever get Ph'ers on there for motoring related pieces. normally is the AA who sell services to motorist so hardly have our best interests to heart.
[generalisation mode]
Mumsnet = bunch of hysterical daily mail reading mothers.
PistonHeads = bunch of hysterical motorists.
anyway what would you talk about given the opportunity?
VR
[generalisation mode]
Mumsnet = bunch of hysterical daily mail reading mothers.
PistonHeads = bunch of hysterical motorists.
anyway what would you talk about given the opportunity?
VR
They are only really interested in being controversial.
I read in the Daily Wail on Saturday how 500,000 civil servants can claim for damaged tights and clothing at the tax-payers expense and after 25 years in said Civil Service, this doubtless came as big a surprise to me as it was to every other civil servant I know.
We always seem to get represented by that loud idiot, Steve Berry.
I read in the Daily Wail on Saturday how 500,000 civil servants can claim for damaged tights and clothing at the tax-payers expense and after 25 years in said Civil Service, this doubtless came as big a surprise to me as it was to every other civil servant I know.

We always seem to get represented by that loud idiot, Steve Berry.
Edited by LuS1fer on Monday 20th February 13:13
LuS1fer said:
They are only really interested in being controversial.
I read in the Daily Wail on Saturday how 500,000 civil servants can claim for damaged tights and clothing at the tax-payers expense and after 25 years in said Civil Service, this doubtless came as big a surprise to me as it was to every other civil servant I know.
I am sure civil servants can claim for clothing, I bet its down to how you interprate a rule for something else though that's for something legitimate. did they back it up with any figures?I read in the Daily Wail on Saturday how 500,000 civil servants can claim for damaged tights and clothing at the tax-payers expense and after 25 years in said Civil Service, this doubtless came as big a surprise to me as it was to every other civil servant I know.

its like the Clarkson strikes 'joke'. where they took it out of complete context then scream blue murder.
VR
VR6 Turbo said:
LuS1fer said:
They are only really interested in being controversial.
I read in the Daily Wail on Saturday how 500,000 civil servants can claim for damaged tights and clothing at the tax-payers expense and after 25 years in said Civil Service, this doubtless came as big a surprise to me as it was to every other civil servant I know.
I am sure civil servants can claim for clothing, I bet its down to how you interprate a rule for something else though that's for something legitimate. did they back it up with any figures? I read in the Daily Wail on Saturday how 500,000 civil servants can claim for damaged tights and clothing at the tax-payers expense and after 25 years in said Civil Service, this doubtless came as big a surprise to me as it was to every other civil servant I know.

Apparently the employer paid up without batting an eyelid. Didn't ask to see the old suit or enquire which door handle it was torn on. Just paid out ...
Oli.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


