Clarkson cleared by Ofcom
Discussion
I did a search first but the search is a bit pants at the moment. Anyhow, some common sense is alive in the world...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-17094...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-17094...
Apache said:
louiebaby said:
EDLT said:
Ofcom, unlike the people who complained, probably watched the entire interview.
That's the whole thing summarised. Perfectly. The whole thing has been a non-story from the start.The bit that made me chuckle was "Unison invited mr Clarckson to spend the day with a healthcare assistant" Why healthcare ? is it because that is a noble decent end of the public sector and is therefore going to be a humbling experience for him ?
No, they want to put him with a healthcare assistant because putting him with a road planner or chief executive would just re-enforce the idea that a great swathe of the public sector exist only to keep themselves in a job.
Seriously, if you are going to invite him to spend a day with a public sector employee then at least let him choose which area is most relevant to the accusation of irrelevance he implied with his original statement.
No, they want to put him with a healthcare assistant because putting him with a road planner or chief executive would just re-enforce the idea that a great swathe of the public sector exist only to keep themselves in a job.
Seriously, if you are going to invite him to spend a day with a public sector employee then at least let him choose which area is most relevant to the accusation of irrelevance he implied with his original statement.
Getragdogleg said:
The bit that made me chuckle was "Unison invited mr Clarckson to spend the day with a healthcare assistant" Why healthcare ? is it because that is a noble decent end of the public sector and is therefore going to be a humbling experience for him ?
No, they want to put him with a healthcare assistant because putting him with a road planner or chief executive would just re-enforce the idea that a great swathe of the public sector exist only to keep themselves in a job.
Seriously, if you are going to invite him to spend a day with a public sector employee then at least let him choose which area is most relevant to the accusation of irrelevance he implied with his original statement.
A day with a Diversity Coordinator in Tower Hamlets would have been a laugh.No, they want to put him with a healthcare assistant because putting him with a road planner or chief executive would just re-enforce the idea that a great swathe of the public sector exist only to keep themselves in a job.
Seriously, if you are going to invite him to spend a day with a public sector employee then at least let him choose which area is most relevant to the accusation of irrelevance he implied with his original statement.
mybrainhurts said:
Apache said:
agreed, it was a pitiful excuse for a whinge
But a useful reminder that some union leaders are as thick as pigs
t and twice as nasty...
s.Mikeyboy said:
BBc news repeated the out of context comment that caused the problem in the first place and then said he had got off.
Somewhat delivered in a style that implied that his own employers didn't want him to have got off.
They are hopeless spackers aren't they? Just cannot help themselves.Somewhat delivered in a style that implied that his own employers didn't want him to have got off.
Mikeyboy said:
BBc news repeated the out of context comment that caused the problem in the first place and then said he had got off.
Somewhat delivered in a style that implied that his own employers didn't want him to have got off.
I do get the impression that the BBC can't afford to lose Clarkson, but that they absolutely detest that he's popular enough for that situation to be so.Somewhat delivered in a style that implied that his own employers didn't want him to have got off.
0000 said:
Mikeyboy said:
BBc news repeated the out of context comment that caused the problem in the first place and then said he had got off.
Somewhat delivered in a style that implied that his own employers didn't want him to have got off.
I do get the impression that the BBC can't afford to lose Clarkson, but that they absolutely detest that he's popular enough for that situation to be so.Somewhat delivered in a style that implied that his own employers didn't want him to have got off.

Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



