Hot FF in Shanghai
Author
Discussion

Justices

Original Poster:

3,682 posts

195 months

Tuesday 21st February 2012
quotequote all
Not the best thing to happen in one of their biggest markets for this model. Story spreading like wildfire (forgive) all over the Chinese blogs. US$850,000+ locally..






Ray_MV

60 posts

208 months

Tuesday 21st February 2012
quotequote all
I hope the occupants got out unscathed.

This happened to an FF whilst on a test drive in Frankfurt too.

http://jalopnik.com/5856379/300000-ferrari-ff-catc...

Streetrod

6,484 posts

237 months

Tuesday 21st February 2012
quotequote all
The 458 all over again?? Lets not hope so.....

ZOLLAR

19,920 posts

204 months

Tuesday 21st February 2012
quotequote all
I'm guessing not an engine fire due to the fire and damage being in the rear (I should be a detective hehe ).
Any ideas on what it may have been?.

456GD

568 posts

223 months

Tuesday 21st February 2012
quotequote all
Presumably the reason for testing it in the snow!

cronk-flakes

3,480 posts

284 months

Tuesday 21st February 2012
quotequote all
ZOLLAR said:
I'm guessing not an engine fire due to the fire and damage being in the rear (I should be a detective hehe ).
Any ideas on what it may have been?.
Looks like it may have started small at the front (first pic) and travelled to the back via a pipe/hose to the fuel tank at the rear.

ZOLLAR

19,920 posts

204 months

Tuesday 21st February 2012
quotequote all
cronk-flakes said:
Looks like it may have started small at the front (first pic) and travelled to the back via a pipe/hose to the fuel tank at the rear.
Good point I think you may be right, I may be wrong but the 458 fires weren't they due to the incorrect engine bay lining/sealant?.
Surely Ferrari wouldn't have made the same mistake twice.

On a side note the FFs have really grown on me, I think they look pretty good now.

MitchT

17,164 posts

240 months

Tuesday 21st February 2012
quotequote all
As a result of previous Ferrari fires (affecting mid-engined examples), along with fires in Lamborghinis, etc., I had engaged in a discussion which concluded that mid-engined cars were more prone to fire because the fuel tank and various bits attached to it are vulnerable because they are sandwiched in the very hot space between the engine and the passenger compartment. However, Ferrari's ability to produce front-engined cars which also self-combust is now blowing my previous conclusion out of the water. So, what is it with Ferraris catching fire? Are they just badly made? I'm pretty sure Aston Martin, Porsche, BMW, etc. who all, produce comparably powerful cars do not have the same issues and, while I accept that a Ferrari fire is far more likely to grab the headlines, surely if the same percentage of total production Ford and Vauxhalls caught fire we'd know about that too because of the sheer volume of cars affected and the fact that they'd be littering the roadsides everywhere.

sinizter

3,348 posts

217 months

Tuesday 21st February 2012
quotequote all
MitchT said:
As a result of previous Ferrari fires (affecting mid-engined examples), along with fires in Lamborghinis, etc., I had engaged in a discussion which concluded that mid-engined cars were more prone to fire because the fuel tank and various bits attached to it are vulnerable because they are sandwiched in the very hot space between the engine and the passenger compartment. However, Ferrari's ability to produce front-engined cars which also self-combust is now blowing my previous conclusion out of the water. So, what is it with Ferraris catching fire? Are they just badly made? I'm pretty sure Aston Martin, Porsche, BMW, etc. who all, produce comparably powerful cars do not have the same issues and, while I accept that a Ferrari fire is far more likely to grab the headlines, surely if the same percentage of total production Ford and Vauxhalls caught fire we'd know about that too because of the sheer volume of cars affected and the fact that they'd be littering the roadsides everywhere.
Other manufacturers' cars might catch fire too. They just won't spread round the internet like wildfire.

ali4390

2,388 posts

196 months

Tuesday 21st February 2012
quotequote all
ZOLLAR said:
On a side note the FFs have really grown on me, I think they look pretty good now.
Not based on this I assume? I love them but the 'Chargrilled' Model does nothing for me.

cl65amg

8 posts

177 months

Tuesday 21st February 2012
quotequote all
Ferrari sets on fire - shock horror.

CIE560

19,652 posts

224 months

Tuesday 21st February 2012
quotequote all
cl65amg said:
Car sets on fire - shock horror.
EFA

MitchT

17,164 posts

240 months

Tuesday 21st February 2012
quotequote all
sinizter said:
Other manufacturers' cars might catch fire too. They just won't spread round the internet like wildfire.
I already addressed that point.

SonnyM

3,475 posts

224 months

Tuesday 21st February 2012
quotequote all
MitchT said:
As a result of previous Ferrari fires (affecting mid-engined examples), along with fires in Lamborghinis, etc., I had engaged in a discussion which concluded that mid-engined cars were more prone to fire because the fuel tank and various bits attached to it are vulnerable because they are sandwiched in the very hot space between the engine and the passenger compartment. However, Ferrari's ability to produce front-engined cars which also self-combust is now blowing my previous conclusion out of the water. So, what is it with Ferraris catching fire? Are they just badly made? I'm pretty sure Aston Martin, Porsche, BMW, etc. who all, produce comparably powerful cars do not have the same issues and, while I accept that a Ferrari fire is far more likely to grab the headlines, surely if the same percentage of total production Ford and Vauxhalls caught fire we'd know about that too because of the sheer volume of cars affected and the fact that they'd be littering the roadsides everywhere.
It's just a bit of glue.

70proof

6,158 posts

186 months

Tuesday 21st February 2012
quotequote all
hot day i guess...... biggrin

sinizter

3,348 posts

217 months

Tuesday 21st February 2012
quotequote all
MitchT said:
sinizter said:
Other manufacturers' cars might catch fire too. They just won't spread round the internet like wildfire.
I already addressed that point.
Sorry. In a rush and too much text without separation meant I missed it.

Harsh

4,551 posts

242 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2012
quotequote all
MitchT said:
sinizter said:
Other manufacturers' cars might catch fire too. They just won't spread round the internet like wildfire.
I already addressed that point.
Well, you put forward an opinion on that point, but you didn't completely address it.
There are no figures (that i can find) on the number of cars in each marque that catch fire so any conclusions are just conjecture.

If we knew that 10% of all FF's caught fire then we would know there was a problem but 2 early production cars is hardly a story at this stage especially without knowing why or how the fire started.

Either way i hope the occupants were ok and if there is a fault in the FF that Ferrari rectify it before we any more 'hot' topics about them wink