Megrahi Innocent?
Author
Discussion

Andrew[MG]

Original Poster:

3,360 posts

229 months

Monday 27th February 2012
quotequote all
http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/home-news/megra... this information was bound to come out at some point, I'm surprised he was allowed to live long enough for it to happen. Will there not be a lot of people getting investigated if this is the truth?

freecar

4,249 posts

218 months

Monday 27th February 2012
quotequote all
The case has stunk for a long long time, we'll never get to the bottom of it.

The evidence he did it is very flimsy and always has been.

The concept that it was revenge for the US shooting down Iran Air 665 then giving the captain and crew medals may have some legs mind!

Getragdogleg

10,296 posts

214 months

Monday 27th February 2012
quotequote all
How unexpected.

Paul Foot wrote a lot of interesting things about this.

Piersman2

6,676 posts

230 months

Monday 27th February 2012
quotequote all
The Private Eye (and some others) have been pointing out the inconsistencies in the case against Megrahi for years and years.

I seems evident to me that he was put forward as a scapegoat by Gaddafi for political expediency and I've no doubt Megrahi was promised his family would be well looked after back home.

The whole Megrahi thing stinks of political show casing and point scoring from when he was first arrested.


Andrew[MG]

Original Poster:

3,360 posts

229 months

Monday 27th February 2012
quotequote all
The sad thing to me is how so few people were willing to look beyond the tabloid reporting and were happy that someone had been convicted - even if he was innocent. The reports from the US about how angry people were on his realise are very worrying.

KB_S1

5,967 posts

260 months

Monday 27th February 2012
quotequote all
The case has always stank.

One man arrested and convicted for the whole atrocity.
People paid by the US DoJ to act as witnesses.
The testimony from the Iranian double agent that was conveniently ignored.

Stinks.

Derek Smith

50,013 posts

279 months

Monday 27th February 2012
quotequote all
We had someone whose relative had died on PanAm 103 come to Gatwick to tell us about the way NOK and other relatives are treated after such events.

She was of a group that sat through the whole of the trial (as did Paul Foot whose report is well worth reading in full) and she said that she was in no doubt whatsoever that Megrahi was fitted up. He may or may not have been involved, but she was certain that the evidence was manufactured and tainted. The fortuitous finding of the tape fragment and the very iffy identification - which would not be allowed in this country now - was not dependable.

In fact the Foot report is a must read for anyone who wants to give an opinion on the matter.

Mojocvh

16,837 posts

293 months

Monday 27th February 2012
quotequote all