James Mudoch - nothing to do with NI
James Mudoch - nothing to do with NI
Author
Discussion

Derek Smith

Original Poster:

50,013 posts

279 months

Wednesday 29th February 2012
quotequote all
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/feb/29/leveso...

So little me is part of the sacrifice.

This is probably to appease someone, probably the American shareholders. He still keeps control of the TV side.

An interesting development but not one that I am capable of discerning the meaning of.

Eric Mc

125,873 posts

296 months

Wednesday 29th February 2012
quotequote all
Geting closer to Wormwod Scrubbs with every move.

Eric Mc

125,873 posts

296 months

Wednesday 29th February 2012
quotequote all
Sacrificial Wolf, more like.

Soovy

35,829 posts

302 months

Wednesday 29th February 2012
quotequote all
Derek Smith said:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/feb/29/leveso...

So little me is part of the sacrifice.

This is probably to appease someone, probably the American shareholders. He still keeps control of the TV side.

An interesting development but not one that I am capable of discerning the meaning of.
Means he can leg it ot the US, where he won't be at risk of extradition.


heppers75

3,135 posts

248 months

Wednesday 29th February 2012
quotequote all
Soovy said:
Means he can leg it ot the US, where he won't be at risk of extradition.
^^ This... Tactical move on the families part I suspect to get those that matter out of harms way!

Corsair7

20,911 posts

278 months

Wednesday 29th February 2012
quotequote all
Soovy said:
Means he can leg it ot the US, where he won't be at risk of extradition.
Are you being sarcastic, or is this really the case?

Marf

22,907 posts

272 months

Wednesday 29th February 2012
quotequote all
Corsair7 said:
Soovy said:
Means he can leg it ot the US, where he won't be at risk of extradition.
Are you being sarcastic, or is this really the case?
Unless you've had your head in the sand for the past few years you surely will not have failed to notice all the stories in relation to the lop sided extradition treaty that exists between the UK and the US?

If he hotfoots it over there then I'd be entirely surprised if an extradition request was honoured, such is the lack of balance in the treaty.

Edited by Marf on Wednesday 29th February 16:29

Soovy

35,829 posts

302 months

Wednesday 29th February 2012
quotequote all
Corsair7 said:
Soovy said:
Means he can leg it ot the US, where he won't be at risk of extradition.
Are you being sarcastic, or is this really the case?
Seriously. It's being suggested that he knew about phone hacking, and has lied to a Parliamentary Committee. Everyone from the cleaning lady up at NI is getting arrested and looking at jail time.

What would you do, if you were him? Stick around and see what happens, or resign your UK obligations and leg it to the US, where there is precisely zero chance of ever being extradited to face charges here?


pork911

7,365 posts

214 months

Wednesday 29th February 2012
quotequote all
My (limited) understanding is that whatever might eventually be proven (if anything) he may be at greater potential risk of prosecution in the US due to more wide ranging laws on corporate responsibility? Though of course these haven't really done much harm to those in finance wink