6 British Soldiers Missing
Author
Discussion

richinleeds

Original Poster:

738 posts

231 months

Wednesday 7th March 2012
quotequote all
6 British soldiers missing presumed dead in an IED blast in Lashkar Gah! http://news.sky.com/home/uk-news/article/16183891

Can we please pull out of this horrible country hopefully following from what the French did when they lost multiple soldiers in a single incident.

Although i am wondering just how big a blast it must have been to rip a Warrior to bits!

Thought's with the family's RIP

rhinochopig

17,932 posts

229 months

Wednesday 7th March 2012
quotequote all
Russian tank mine costs fek all and would do the job easily. Warriors are not that well protected being mostly aluminium and appliqué IIRC. They also have a flat bottom, which is not the best shape for a mine blast.

Such a waste of life though.

Eric Mc

125,879 posts

296 months

Wednesday 7th March 2012
quotequote all
Sad news all round.

Are you achieving anything over there now?

richinleeds

Original Poster:

738 posts

231 months

Wednesday 7th March 2012
quotequote all
I think we are achieving a hell of a lot but at what price?? Risk vs reward i don't think it's worth the loss of over 400 British lives tbh

thinfourth2

32,414 posts

235 months

Wednesday 7th March 2012
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Sad news all round.

Are you achieving anything over there now?
Creating terrorists?

MikeGTi

2,754 posts

232 months

Wednesday 7th March 2012
quotequote all
Bad news frown

richinleeds said:
Although i am wondering just how big a blast it must have been to rip a Warrior to bits!
Pretty big. Though I would imagine a UVIED would have been the method used, much greater effect vs. a Warrior.



Dr Banjo

803 posts

180 months

Wednesday 7th March 2012
quotequote all
Sad loss of life frown

However what is going to happen when our forces leave ?

The Taliban will just play a waiting game and then just rip the Afgan police/army to shreds when we are not there to protect them.

Iraq is now descending into a shower of st.

As a massive follower of our armed forces I would have to agree... not worth the lives lost as there is no long term strategy.

Cant remember who said it, maybe an american but he suggested that it may be better to fight them on our own soil than to try and contain them on foreign soil. Maybe there is some mileage in this.

Corsair7

20,911 posts

278 months

Wednesday 7th March 2012
quotequote all
Very odd to deem them 'missing', yet inform families of their death. Confused.

New tactic from the insurgents? Bigger blast?

Makes a cold shiver run through you.


Any achievements in this country are temporary. We build a school and employ a teacher, they kill the teacher and destroy the school.


richinleeds

Original Poster:

738 posts

231 months

Wednesday 7th March 2012
quotequote all
MikeGTi said:
Bad news frown

richinleeds said:
Although i am wondering just how big a blast it must have been to rip a Warrior to bits!
Pretty big. Though I would imagine a UVIED would have been the method used, much greater effect vs. a Warrior.
Yep i can't see why we use warrior out there tbh, too vulnerable to those sort of attacks especially when we have other vehicles that can pretty much do the same thing.

Soovy

35,829 posts

302 months

Wednesday 7th March 2012
quotequote all


We should GTFO of all of these ungrateful stholes.

We should pull the wagons into a circle and protct our borders from attack. That's what the Forces are meant for.

richinleeds

Original Poster:

738 posts

231 months

Wednesday 7th March 2012
quotequote all
I would think their saying missing because there is not a great deal left of them frown

richinleeds

Original Poster:

738 posts

231 months

Wednesday 7th March 2012
quotequote all
Dr Banjo said:
Sad loss of life frown

However what is going to happen when our forces leave ?

The Taliban will just play a waiting game and then just rip the Afgan police/army to shreds when we are not there to protect them.

Iraq is now descending into a shower of st.

As a massive follower of our armed forces I would have to agree... not worth the lives lost as there is no long term strategy.

Cant remember who said it, maybe an american but he suggested that it may be better to fight them on our own soil than to try and contain them on foreign soil. Maybe there is some mileage in this.
Totally agree Banjo

MikeGTi

2,754 posts

232 months

Wednesday 7th March 2012
quotequote all
richinleeds said:
Yep i can't see why we use warrior out there tbh, too vulnerable to those sort of attacks especially when we have other vehicles that can pretty much do the same thing.
30mm Cannon, presence. AFAIK there are very few of them out there, and they don't venture too far into the Green Zone.

Now Terry knows how to defeat it though, smacks of the later days of TELIC.

richinleeds

Original Poster:

738 posts

231 months

Wednesday 7th March 2012
quotequote all
MikeGTi said:
richinleeds said:
Yep i can't see why we use warrior out there tbh, too vulnerable to those sort of attacks especially when we have other vehicles that can pretty much do the same thing.
30mm Cannon, presence. AFAIK there are very few of them out there, and they don't venture too far into the Green Zone.

Now Terry knows how to defeat it though, smacks of the later days of TELIC.
Yep but if i remember correctly they don't actually use the 30mm, i agree though the presence is a factor..........hey why don't we go the whole hog and get some CR2 out there now that will show a presence!

rhinochopig

17,932 posts

229 months

Wednesday 7th March 2012
quotequote all
MikeGTi said:
Bad news frown

richinleeds said:
Although i am wondering just how big a blast it must have been to rip a Warrior to bits!
Pretty big. Though I would imagine a UVIED would have been the method used, much greater effect vs. a Warrior.
Doesn't actually need to be that big. A copper EFP based IED can be quite small and do the job. Nasty horrible things.

Bing o

15,184 posts

250 months

Wednesday 7th March 2012
quotequote all
Dr Banjo said:
Sad loss of life frown

However what is going to happen when our forces leave ?

The Taliban will just play a waiting game and then just rip the Afgan police/army to shreds when we are not there to protect them.

Iraq is now descending into a shower of st.

As a massive follower of our armed forces I would have to agree... not worth the lives lost as there is no long term strategy.

Cant remember who said it, maybe an american but he suggested that it may be better to fight them on our own soil than to try and contain them on foreign soil. Maybe there is some mileage in this.
Or the US could just use their own oil rather than the middle east's and we can leave the ME to it's own beardy, sandy existence - they might want to stop blowing us up. Who knows, it may just work....

MikeGTi

2,754 posts

232 months

Wednesday 7th March 2012
quotequote all
rhinochopig said:
MikeGTi said:
Bad news frown

richinleeds said:
Although i am wondering just how big a blast it must have been to rip a Warrior to bits!
Pretty big. Though I would imagine a UVIED would have been the method used, much greater effect vs. a Warrior.
Doesn't actually need to be that big. A copper EFP based IED can be quite small and do the job. Nasty horrible things.
True, but AFAIK there hasn't been widespread use of EFP in Afghanistan so far.

The other factor is that Warriors in Afghanistan mainly use bar armour instead of applique to save weight.

richinleeds said:
Yep but if i remember correctly they don't actually use the 30mm, i agree though the presence is a factor..........hey why don't we go the whole hog and get some CR2 out there now that will show a presence!
I don't see why not, 30mm was used when we had Scimitars out there. The reason we don't use CR2 is that it's too heavy (Warrior is pushing it) and there's no need for a 120mm HESH spitting beast biggrin


FartKong

897 posts

214 months

Wednesday 7th March 2012
quotequote all
The whole thing is a joke. I watched the final episode of Royal Marrines Mission Afghanistan on tv last night and it made me furious to see the injuries our guys are suffering - FOR WHAT? As has been said, everything that has been achieved will be shot and torn down within months of pulling out of the country. We should leave now and let the whole middle east rot in hell.

obob

4,193 posts

225 months

Wednesday 7th March 2012
quotequote all
Soovy said:
We should GTFO of all of these ungrateful stholes.

We should pull the wagons into a circle and protct our borders from attack. That's what the Forces are meant for.
Yes they should be eternally grateful for us bombing the st out of them.

Kudos

2,674 posts

205 months

Wednesday 7th March 2012
quotequote all
Terribly sad news

Dr Banjo said:
However what is going to happen when our forces leave ?

The Taliban will just play a waiting game and then just rip the Afgan police/army to shreds when we are not there to protect them.
Harsh as it may sound, is that "our" problem?

Do what Australia did, take no part in global operations and protect our own borders better.

I had a debate with a colleague who is ex military. His view was that we wouls "lose our place at the top table". So what?