Merge in turn ...

Author
Discussion

130R

Original Poster:

6,810 posts

207 months

Wednesday 21st March 2012
quotequote all
Do you think there is any chance the general idiots public will ever learn this concept or should I just give up now? I was merging into one lane last night and some moron in a truck parked diagonally across both lanes half a mile before they converged to stop people from "cutting in" rolleyes

Hoofy

76,380 posts

283 months

Wednesday 21st March 2012
quotequote all
It's not a problem, really. You just have to merge in turn sooner than you would like to.

gtdc

4,259 posts

284 months

Wednesday 21st March 2012
quotequote all
Why do people not do it though? Don't understand the resistance to the concept.

Robb F

4,569 posts

172 months

Wednesday 21st March 2012
quotequote all
Another one about it?

There was a good one when a road warrior was boasting about blocking people from driving in the empty lane. Did not end well for him laugh

Six Fiend

6,067 posts

216 months

Wednesday 21st March 2012
quotequote all
gtdc said:
Why do people not do it though? Don't understand the resistance to the concept.
Because they are really very stupid.


Dr Doofenshmirtz

15,241 posts

201 months

Wednesday 21st March 2012
quotequote all
When you see a trucker doing this, it's worth trying your best to overtake them, just so you can merge-in-turn properly and spoil their stupid little game.

Doofus

25,829 posts

174 months

Wednesday 21st March 2012
quotequote all
130R said:
Do you think there is any chance the general idiots public will ever learn this concept or should I just give up now? I was merging into one lane last night and some moron in a truck parked diagonally across both lanes half a mile before they converged to stop people from "cutting in" rolleyes
If he 'parked' there, it's because the traffic was already stationary. The reason it wasn't moving was all the people who stayed out until the last moment, and then cut in, causing traffic in the moving lane to stop.

If people weren't so determined to get in front of "Just one more car", merging wouldn't be any kind of a problem.

gtdc

4,259 posts

284 months

Wednesday 21st March 2012
quotequote all
Six Fiend said:
gtdc said:
Why do people not do it though? Don't understand the resistance to the concept.
Because they are really very stupid.
They must have some kind of reason though? I just can't conceive it.

130R

Original Poster:

6,810 posts

207 months

Wednesday 21st March 2012
quotequote all
Doofus said:
If he 'parked' there, it's because the traffic was already stationary. The reason it wasn't moving was all the people who stayed out until the last moment, and then cut in, causing traffic in the moving lane to stop.
That's how merge in turn works ...

Robb F

4,569 posts

172 months

Wednesday 21st March 2012
quotequote all
Doofus said:
The reason it wasn't moving was all the people who stayed out until the last moment, and then cut in, causing traffic in the moving lane to stop.

If people weren't so determined to get in front of "Just one more car", merging wouldn't be any kind of a problem.
ooo there's always one isn't there biggrin


Don't merge as one big two-mile long queue

6potdave

2,310 posts

214 months

Wednesday 21st March 2012
quotequote all
I regularly come across this on my commute home from work. There was some guy blocking me in the other week but the other side of the road was clear so I just overtook him. He was literally fuming but FFS I merged in about 100 yards before it would have been regarded as 'cutting in'. IMO I prefer it as it is, put all the muppets in one lane and the other one is free for people with a brain.

grayze

790 posts

169 months

Wednesday 21st March 2012
quotequote all
I found that if you leave a car size gap between you and the car in front in the mergee lane, people in the merger lane usualy get the idea and follow the merge in turn rules.

joebongo

1,516 posts

176 months

Wednesday 21st March 2012
quotequote all
It's a problem we will not easily solve in the UK.

Most people in the UK just form a single queue rather than using both lanes and merging in turn.

Next you get two types of people using L2 or whatever:

1 - People who understand the concept and what has been asked by the signage and do it.
2 - People who are s and will do anything at all they can get away with at all times, including queue jumping.

Types 1 and 2 people are perceived to have jumped the queue. Some have (type 2s) some haven't (type 1), but either way the people in L1 queue move more slowly as they have to let in the stream of L2 traffic, and given that the majority of people in the UK form the longer L1 queue in ignorance of the signage, this means L2 is less used and the people using it will inevitably get through the obstruction quicker.

When a lorry straddles both and stops the L2 users from moving up front it speeds up the L1 queue and so traffic for L1 users moves faster. I have to admit I'm always pleased when I see this as it's no fun watching people go past when you've been waiting for your "turn" for ages. I don't use L2 unless a critical mass of people are also doing it as I try to be polite (rightly or wrongly).

The only way round it is for all traffic to use both lanes, but educating people would cost money and the Tories only give and take for their rich mates so it won't happen.

Edit: After re-reading my post I realise I am part of the problem and need to address my behaviour. But then I'd be badged as a tt. Oh noes. What to do?

Edited by joebongo on Wednesday 21st March 14:03

chris7676

2,685 posts

221 months

Wednesday 21st March 2012
quotequote all
Why is it "In Turn" ?

ewenm

28,506 posts

246 months

Wednesday 21st March 2012
quotequote all
chris7676 said:
Why is it "In Turn" ?
Because it keeps both lanes moving.

Merging further back just moves the pinch point further back and makes a longer queue which can end up blocking junctions or complicating traffic flow further back.

Mr Gear

9,416 posts

191 months

Wednesday 21st March 2012
quotequote all
gtdc said:
Why do people not do it though? Don't understand the resistance to the concept.


Because our signs usually show this ^

Which contradicts the "merge in turn" principle in people's minds. It says the right lane is closing, so get in the lane that isn't. That is why people resent other people who attempt to merge at the last minute.

However, the highway code contradicts what the signs say anyway. If we had more sensible signage, people would be more likely to form to even queues and then merge sensibly.

Maybe something like this:


gtdc

4,259 posts

284 months

Wednesday 21st March 2012
quotequote all
Mr Gear said:
gtdc said:
Why do people not do it though? Don't understand the resistance to the concept.


Because our signs usually show this ^

Which contradicts the "merge in turn" principle in people's minds. It says the right lane is closing, so get in the lane that isn't. That is why people resent other people who attempt to merge at the last minute.

However, the highway code contradicts what the signs say anyway. If we had more sensible signage, people would be more likely to form to even queues and then merge sensibly.

Maybe something like this:

Plan.

All that jazz

7,632 posts

147 months

Wednesday 21st March 2012
quotequote all
130R said:
Do you think there is any chance the general idiots public will ever learn this concept or should I just give up now? I was merging into one lane last night and some moron in a truck parked diagonally across both lanes half a mile before they converged to stop people from "cutting in" rolleyes
NTSA hehe .

chris7676

2,685 posts

221 months

Wednesday 21st March 2012
quotequote all
ewenm said:
chris7676 said:
Why is it "In Turn" ?
Because it keeps both lanes moving.

Merging further back just moves the pinch point further back and makes a longer queue which can end up blocking junctions or complicating traffic flow further back.
I see, still don't understand the use of "turn" word and how in practice it would differ from the merge "not in turn", none assumes stopping to form the queue, which may happen anyway if there is excessive traffic... In fact the queue is often causes by the late squeezers as I have noticed, or are you saying it's due to the "not in turn" signage?

freecar

4,249 posts

188 months

Wednesday 21st March 2012
quotequote all
For those who don't understand why....

Capacity, the road can hold more cars side by side so the traffic wont have as much effect down stream as one long queue does.

So if you fight the merge in turn rule you're making more traffic for others behind you.