Porsche Boxster 981 Spyder (what it might look like)
Porsche Boxster 981 Spyder (what it might look like)
Author
Discussion

iandews

Original Poster:

2,893 posts

200 months

Thursday 5th April 2012
quotequote all
Not sure if this has been posted on here or not, but someone has done a mock up of how the 981 Boxster Spyder may look if they develop one.

If they do, and it looks anything like this (with more powerful engine and less weight), I'll be first on the list for one!!!



Edited by iandews on Thursday 5th April 23:12

DS240

5,662 posts

247 months

Thursday 5th April 2012
quotequote all
If it has an auto roof, then it will be a poor replacement.

The 987 spyder is was it is because of the odd compromise. The unique bodywork was a major plus point.

But those changes and 'compromises' were done for one reason only, to increase the performance, including the handling.

I really don't know whether there will be another soon. If there is, it will be a good 4-5 years away.

The full spyder effect on the new 981 would look good.

TOENHEEL

4,501 posts

256 months

Thursday 5th April 2012
quotequote all
I would be surprised to see one, if they do it will be at the end of the 981's life cycle and judging by the 987 will be years away.

iandews

Original Poster:

2,893 posts

200 months

Friday 6th April 2012
quotequote all
TOENHEEL said:
I would be surprised to see one, if they do it will be at the end of the 981's life cycle and judging by the 987 will be years away.
Really, as late as that? Guess I might have to consider the Boxster S then.

mayes911

5,985 posts

214 months

Friday 6th April 2012
quotequote all
specials or should i say not so specials always come out mid lifecycle(ie facelift time in 3years and would be something like the rs60/cayman sport).full specials end of life cycle 7years ala 911gts/r/spyder.so i think we have a long wait until we see the likes of a spyder.dont forget the spyder/cayman R /911gts were run out specials to empty the production line/parts bin to make way for the 991/981.

anniesdad

14,589 posts

267 months

Monday 13th January 2014
quotequote all
Looks like one may be coming. The words of Walter Rohrl according to the PH frontpage.

"Yes, during the press launch everybody was complaining and saying: 'Why?!' But I said, 'Be happy! Drive the car and you will see how much easier it is for you to go fast.' The shifting is something very impressive. I think most engine problems we have created because people were not able to watch the rev counter, watch the speed, and know when to shift. So they would shift back too early and the engine would be over-revving. With PDK, you avoid this. But for myself, if I want to buy a car, and I want to say I keep this car for the next 20 years, I would always take a manual gearbox, because I believe more, I trust more in a manual than in a double clutch. I've just ordered a Boxster Spyder with a manual shift - and I know that it's working, it's perfect, and it's up to me how I handle things. But PDK makes life easier for normal customers."


DS240

5,662 posts

247 months

Monday 13th January 2014
quotequote all
How old is this quote?

To say he has ordered a spyder without even some hint a new one is coming makes we think this is dated.

My earlier view has also changed. I'm not sure how a spyder effect change on a 981 would look now.



anniesdad

14,589 posts

267 months

Monday 13th January 2014
quotequote all
In interview with PH at the 2014 Autosport show.

DS240

5,662 posts

247 months

Monday 13th January 2014
quotequote all
Okay, I stopped being lazy and actually read the piece.

My feeling is he is referring to a 987 Spyder. 'Ordered' perhaps means 'just bought' as in second hand with his English.

Not a bad endorsement of the Spyder if it is a 987 he is talking about.

anniesdad

14,589 posts

267 months

Monday 13th January 2014
quotequote all
You could well be right and I agree a great endorsement for the manual Spyder's. smile

JiggyJaggy

1,474 posts

169 months

Monday 13th January 2014
quotequote all
Any photos from the back?

nsm3

2,831 posts

225 months

Monday 13th January 2014
quotequote all

anniesdad

14,589 posts

267 months

Monday 13th January 2014
quotequote all
Looks pretty good to me.

JiggyJaggy

1,474 posts

169 months

Monday 13th January 2014
quotequote all
Nice. Suddenly the Boxster looks appealing!

rob.kellock

2,248 posts

221 months

Monday 13th January 2014
quotequote all
That picture was posted before the launch of the 981 as how a "Boxster R" might look.

The one I posted came from the PCGB forum - I'll repost it here to save having to follow the link above.


griffter

4,143 posts

284 months

Tuesday 14th January 2014
quotequote all
anniesdad said:
Looks like one may be coming. The words of Walter Rohrl according to the PH frontpage.

"...Spyder..."
He might just be using the term (arguably incorrectly) in a generic sense (meaning 'roadster').

anniesdad

14,589 posts

267 months

Tuesday 14th January 2014
quotequote all
griffter said:
He might just be using the term (arguably incorrectly) in a generic sense (meaning 'roadster').
Agreed but WR should know the whole world knows what a Boxster is if that's what he's ordered, we don't need to be told it's a roadster smile. You would have thought bearing in mind he's (probably) had some input into the development of the "Spyder" that he would have known the Boxster Spyder is a different model to the standard car. I would have thought that he would have ordered a standard Boxster when the cars were brought out in 2012? Who knows?...

rob.kellock

2,248 posts

221 months

Tuesday 14th January 2014
quotequote all
DELETED: Comment made by a member who's account has been deleted.
I think it's a photoshop.

I like it.



Zyp

16,080 posts

218 months

Tuesday 14th January 2014
quotequote all
Wrong wheels

Actus Reus

4,312 posts

184 months

Tuesday 14th January 2014
quotequote all
Didn't think I'd like those rims, but had them on a Boxster loaner, and was actually quite taken with them. Made the brakes look bloody tiny mind you.