Buying a used jag x

Author
Discussion

PNN

Original Poster:

43 posts

178 months

Friday 6th April 2012
quotequote all
Good morning all...

Looking for a reliable used car that looks good and impresses clients.

I stumbled across x types. I was surprised that 5k will buy a 05 plat with 80'000 miles.

Any feedback please over If these are good buys generally and cost of repair/prts.

Thanks.


Mark

BE57 TOY

2,628 posts

148 months

Friday 6th April 2012
quotequote all
I think the X type sport 2.2d looks nice however when I was looking at them a couple of years ago all I got was "they're a Mondeo" or "they're an old mans car". I am still to this day interested if they're reliable or not though!

PNN

Original Poster:

43 posts

178 months

Friday 6th April 2012
quotequote all
Yeh. I get that too ...."an old mans car". I think the saloons look like that but I think the shape of the estate makes them look good, streamlined and practical. Ford engine?

BE57 TOY

2,628 posts

148 months

Friday 6th April 2012
quotequote all
PNN said:
Yeh. I get that too ...."an old mans car". I think the saloons look like that but I think the shape of the estate makes them look good, streamlined and practical. Ford engine?
It could be. The chassis certainly is. I kind of switched off when I was being told to be honest! And then bought an Audi instead because "they're what I know"

Six Fiend

6,067 posts

216 months

Friday 6th April 2012
quotequote all
Which one are you looking at?

Diesels v Petrol have different issues.

When you delve into cars all makes and models have weaknesses of some sort and specific forums for any car wil put you off!

In the petrol AWD X-types it's the transfer box (leaks and is made of chocolate) and prop bearing.

In the diesels it's the turbo/actuator.

However, not all will go bang, you just tend to hear about the ones which have wink

The service parts are all Ford:

Oil, air, fuel and pollen filters are straight Mondeo.

Plugs, pads and discs are too.

So you get the badge of a Jag, a lovely place to sit in and a great drive for Mondeo money.

Mine goes to a local indie Ford garage for servicing. As it's ten years old I do some of the work myself and they do the fiddly/very oily bits.

As a car to drive I find it very comfy (electric leather but not heated frown ) and has a big old boot.
Handling on my 3.0se is quite soft, but with back and hip issues I like comfort. Sport models are a tad stiffer. In any case it will hustle along at an indecent pace before it ties itself up in nots on twisty bits with bumps smile

The toys to have are cruise, electric seats, leather, climate and bum warmers. Many have heated front screen too.

I like the looks and fact it seems well screwed together over all.

Sport models are "younger" looking with no chrome and more colour coded bits.

Estates look fab and are very practical. They got the lines perfect on them.

Mine also might have fruity stainless pipes for a decent noise wink

smile

Edited by Six Fiend on Friday 6th April 09:37

motco

15,968 posts

247 months

Friday 6th April 2012
quotequote all
The platform is Mondeo (engine, gearbox) but that represents only 35% of the car, I gather. I have recently bought a 2.2 Sovereign estate and thus far am very pleased with it. The Mk3 Mondeo I had previously was, as standard, better equipped though, with heated windscreen as standard for example. On the X these things can be extras dependent on model. I wanted a diesel with no particulate filter (DPF) and the Mondeos of 2007, after which they had them, were all very high mileage. X types of the same age were generally very low mileage and similarly priced to slightly newer Mondeos with DPFs and high mileage. Autos had DPFs as standard but manuals had them as an option. 2.2 has a six speed box, but 2.0 five in most cases.

PNN

Original Poster:

43 posts

178 months

Friday 6th April 2012
quotequote all
But you get more for your more money with the jagsmile

Looking at a3 as well....£6k for a 5dr 100,000 mile 05 plate

Six Fiend

6,067 posts

216 months

Friday 6th April 2012
quotequote all
PNN said:
But you get more for your more money with the jagsmile

Looking at a3 as well....£6k for a 5dr 100,000 mile 05 plate
And when people ask what you drive you can say "Jaaag" biggrin

PNN

Original Poster:

43 posts

178 months

Friday 6th April 2012
quotequote all
smile

Thanks for the information; great review

5potTurbo

12,555 posts

169 months

Friday 6th April 2012
quotequote all
My stepdad had a 3.0 manual X type until recently. I think the manual box version is quite rare, but the clutches can be a bit snatchy.
He recently got a good part-ex on it and bought a newer 2.2D wagon in black. It's a very nice place to be.

PNN

Original Poster:

43 posts

178 months

Friday 6th April 2012
quotequote all
Any idea on other part prices?

Six Fiend

6,067 posts

216 months

Friday 6th April 2012
quotequote all
PNN said:
Any idea on other part prices?
What do you have in mind?

Wheel bearings - same as a Mondeo!

Body bits and fixtures and fittings - second hand fine, eBay specials cheap for clips and fixings (Jag not so!).

Just had to buy an HO2 sensor for mine, genuine Jag part £69 delivered.

Windscreen, non-heated, changed for £115.

Um...tyres are fairly common sizes so plenty to choose from - I think I paid £65 a corner for Falken 452s.

Loads of used parts around smile


exgtt

2,067 posts

213 months

Friday 6th April 2012
quotequote all
2.0 v6 avoids usual issues if you dont mind average performance and high 20's mpg.

chrismscotland

19 posts

146 months

Saturday 7th April 2012
quotequote all
Is there any guidance as to which diesel X-Types to avoid? I know that there seems to be some advice around which engines have DPF fitted and also that some of the newer cars seem to be less reliable..

BorkFactor

7,266 posts

159 months

Saturday 7th April 2012
quotequote all
If it is the same 2.0 TDCI engine as the mk3 Mondeo then it can suffer from all of the usual diesel worries - clutch, flywheel, turbo, EGR valve, injectors etc etc.

If it was my money, I would get a cheaper / better specced / newer petrol version instead. Less to worry about, and one of the above failures would qipe out any fuel savings.

chrismscotland

19 posts

146 months

Saturday 7th April 2012
quotequote all
How about the 2.2 diesel? I'm not sure I could afford to run a petrol!

Six Fiend

6,067 posts

216 months

Saturday 7th April 2012
quotequote all
My 3.0 petrol manual gives a steady 21-22mpg in town doing the usual stop-start driving.

On the motorway I tend to trundle these days (unemployed y'see!) at about 65 which gives around 38mpg. You can work out from there the faster you go the more it uses wink

Mixed use will see an average in the high 20s.

However...I do use a lot of forward observation and planning and don't boot it everywhere. It does get an Italian tune-up to keep it healthy from time to time smile

motco

15,968 posts

247 months

Saturday 7th April 2012
quotequote all
The 2.2 is also a Ford unit but it is more powerful, and much more torquey. Fuel consumption is a little worse only.