Which Vintage Submariner

[Jonny TVR]

Obviously there is the small questgion of budget, however I'm favouring the 5513 from the mid to late 60's. I have seen some very crisp looking examples but they almost too new, what is the point in buying a vintage watch if it doesn't look as if it is vintage and unrestored. Also seen one with an almost extreme patina on it. Or should I just stop all this nonsense and get a new one! Its been troubling me for several days now!!

[clockworks]

I've never seen the point of paying a premium for a battered older Rolex. Get one that's a few years old, and just wear it. It'll hold it's value.

Paying a high price for something that's currently sold at a premium because it's "in fashion" could pay off, or you could catch a cold if the price drops back to a sensible level.

[JABB]

I think I am right in saying the vintage ones are slimmer than the newer ones.

[Jonny TVR]

You may be right, also the gmt seem cheaper than the sub and visually not much difference. How much do you think I should pay with all the papers etc

Edited by Jonny TVR on Monday 9th April 19:29

[JABB]

How long is a piece of string. Private from, say £5000.
Why not have a look at a Tudor Sub. Same age, couple of £k cheaper

[andy tims]

Loose 5513's in nice condition can be had for low £4k's

Add approx £1,000 for one with box & papers.

Watches such as these will hold their value & should increase slowly over time.

[toohuge]

andy tims said:

Loose 5513's in nice condition can be had for low £4k's

Add approx £1,000 for one with box & papers.

Watches such as these will hold their value & should increase slowly over time.

+1 to Andy. Good advice.

If you are interested in a 5513 I know someone who is looking to sell his, it's beautiful. PM if you want the details.

Chris

[Jonny TVR]

Thanks for advise. Just bougt a 16800 1986 with a full set from Jason at sweepinghands.co.uk.