m&s ad - Barlow version of Here Comes The Sun
Discussion
thehawk said:
He hasn't done it a disservice but I see little point in it, just Karaoke really. They could have done the ad with the original.
I like that way of putting it - it is just glorified karaoke. Rarely does a cover perform better than the original (Hallelujah covered by Jeff Buckley and Song to the Siren covered by the Cocteau Twins spring to mind as a couple)Gary Barlow - eurgh. I (just) remember the original from my parents playing it in the car when we went on holiday. Cassette player wedged between the handbrake and passenger seat. Happy memories of sunny days. And, as has been pointed out, it doesn't tell you what it is selling until the end.
Yet I still kinda like it. No, I know. I shouldn't. All the ads nowadays are formulaic and slaves to the advertising standards code, it is nice to see one that's just "we want you to like our products".
Yet I still kinda like it. No, I know. I shouldn't. All the ads nowadays are formulaic and slaves to the advertising standards code, it is nice to see one that's just "we want you to like our products".
The advert is quite cool but, the song. Why?
He has affected his voice to mimic The Beatles, it is all a bit softer and neater than the original.
I just don't see the point in this version really.
Something is bugging me about the timing in it too but, I have only heard it on the advert a couple of times so haven't figured out what it is.
He has affected his voice to mimic The Beatles, it is all a bit softer and neater than the original.
I just don't see the point in this version really.
Something is bugging me about the timing in it too but, I have only heard it on the advert a couple of times so haven't figured out what it is.
He's just "blandified" the song, has added NOTHING of any musical merit rendering it pointless.
Why not just have the original instead?
I'm all for a good cover/interpretation of songs but this stuff (and most pop-factor-whatever stuff) is the musical equivalent of taking a work of art and making a cheap print and leaving out all the fine artwork and detail etc. At worse, it's like a masterpiece and creating a colour-by-numbers version of it
In motoring terms, it's like one of those Ferrari "replicas" 
Why not just have the original instead?
I'm all for a good cover/interpretation of songs but this stuff (and most pop-factor-whatever stuff) is the musical equivalent of taking a work of art and making a cheap print and leaving out all the fine artwork and detail etc. At worse, it's like a masterpiece and creating a colour-by-numbers version of it
In motoring terms, it's like one of those Ferrari "replicas" 
audidoody said:
Any guesses on how much M&S paid for the rights?
I'd guess at least £250,000
I'd guess the Performing Rights Society's standard rates. I would also guess they use Gary Barlow because he is more identifiable by the target demographic than the women who are fans of George Harrison.I'd guess at least £250,000
Gassing Station | TV, Film, Streaming & Radio | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff




