More Formula 1 trouble ahead!
More Formula 1 trouble ahead!
Author
Discussion

carmarthenf1

Original Poster:

129 posts

184 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
Dilemma: There is another Country due to stage a Grand Prix that has corruption in Government and is in frequent breach of the Human Rights Convention which it is challenging, imprisons people for years without trial, who's police shoot unarmed people, that suppresses riots with violence sometimes killing people, monitors e-mails, telephone conversations and internet activity of all it's citizens, is involved in torture of individuals and has actively supported rebels to violently overthrow their governments when those governments do not submit to the Country in question's demands. There is much more - too much to set out here. Should that Country be allowed to hold a Grand Prix?

the other me

614 posts

182 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
OK, I'm going to bite, as no-one else has. . . . . where ?

StevieBee

15,284 posts

284 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
I believe OP is talking about the good ol' US of A

the other me

614 posts

182 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
Have to agree if that is the case, but "officially" these are the "good guys" remember rolleyes

wainy

800 posts

272 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
British Gp?!

fatboy69

9,424 posts

216 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
It doesn't matter because Bernie says it is safe to go so what do the rest of us know?

fk all apparently due to us not living in Bernie's little bubble of perfection. Idiot.

StevieBee

15,284 posts

284 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
You could pick over the politics of every country F1 visit and find just reason not to go there. Take India; a country that receives billions in aid from the west yet is rich enough to have a space programme whilst the majority of its population lives in abject poverty.

Eric Mc

125,606 posts

294 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
The difference with Bahrain is thatb the regime were using F1 as a plank in their policy of telling the world that the country was stable, normal and safe.

That is not the case in other countries. In more "developed" countries (irresespective of the human rights record of the regime) F1 is just another event swamped by lots of other events and it does not stand out in the same way - and is not used in the same way by the regime.

DJRC

23,563 posts

265 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
carmarthenf1 said:
Dilemma: There is another Country due to stage a Grand Prix that has corruption in Government and is in frequent breach of the Human Rights Convention which it is challenging, imprisons people for years without trial, who's police shoot unarmed people, that suppresses riots with violence sometimes killing people, monitors e-mails, telephone conversations and internet activity of all it's citizens, is involved in torture of individuals and has actively supported rebels to violently overthrow their governments when those governments do not submit to the Country in question's demands. There is much more - too much to set out here. Should that Country be allowed to hold a Grand Prix?
Who

The

fk

Cares?

Eric Mc

125,606 posts

294 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
DJRC said:
Who

The

fk

Cares?
This chap probably -


StevieBee

15,284 posts

284 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
This chap probably -

That's Martin Brundle at Sky HQ in Bahrain being 'spoken to' by Murdoch's people about appearing on the BBC Forum!

Cheese Mechanic

3,157 posts

198 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
DJRC said:
Who

The

fk

Cares?
Precisely.

Eric Mc

125,606 posts

294 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
StevieBee said:
Eric Mc said:
This chap probably -

That's Martin Brundle at Sky HQ in Bahrain being 'spoken to' by Murdoch's people about appearing on the BBC Forum!
"Wasn't my fault gov, I was kidnapped".

heightswitch

6,322 posts

279 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
Not a welsh Grand prix this year is there??

Eric Mc

125,606 posts

294 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
heightswitch said:
Not a welsh Grand prix this year is there??
Pembrey or Anglesey?

wolves_wanderer

12,951 posts

266 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
carmarthenf1 said:
Dilemma: There is another Country due to stage a Grand Prix that has corruption in Government and is in frequent breach of the Human Rights Convention which it is challenging, imprisons people for years without trial, who's police shoot unarmed people, that suppresses riots with violence sometimes killing people, monitors e-mails, telephone conversations and internet activity of all it's citizens, is involved in torture of individuals and has actively supported rebels to violently overthrow their governments when those governments do not submit to the Country in question's demands. There is much more - too much to set out here. Should that Country be allowed to hold a Grand Prix?
Shouldn't you be posting a thread about racingdude?

DanDC5

19,991 posts

196 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
DJRC said:
Who

The

fk

Cares?
This chap probably -

It's a shame more scrotes aren't dealt with like that over here to be honest.

eps

7,088 posts

298 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
heightswitch said:
Not a welsh Grand prix this year is there??
Pembrey or Anglesey?
Well it is Anglesey International now!! wink

Eric Mc

125,606 posts

294 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
DanDC5 said:
Eric Mc said:
DJRC said:
Who

The

fk

Cares?
This chap probably -

It's a shame more scrotes aren't dealt with like that over here to be honest.
So you reckon that chap was a "scrote" then?

CampDavid

9,145 posts

227 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
DanDC5 said:
Eric Mc said:
DJRC said:
Who

The

fk

Cares?
This chap probably -

It's a shame more scrotes aren't dealt with like that over here to be honest.
So you reckon that chap was a "scrote" then?
He's either clueless or a sociopath