1973 Jensen Interceptor MKIII - Restoration
1973 Jensen Interceptor MKIII - Restoration
Author
Discussion

task

Original Poster:

418 posts

200 months

Monday 30th April 2012
quotequote all
As with many restorations around our household this started with a trailer and a boot full of bits

arriving at my parents house. My Father had decided to purchase a dilapidated looking MKIII Interceptor

with the aim of rebuilding it.



The car had been off the road for quite a few years but prior to being laid up had been subject to an

extensive restoration by Jensen specialists Copedy Bridge, the body work is littered with their badges.

This meant the car was 99.9% rust free, there are a few locations where the under-seal isn't 100% but

they're easy to access and not complex. However this Jensen is not without problems, the biggest of

which being the not so happy engine under the bonnet. This also turned out to be a slight non-issue as

the sale included engine parts that read like a engine builders "wish list"

re-bored 440Ci Chrysler block
balanced crank, pocketed pistons and rods to match
JP Duplex timing chain
Edelbrock Performer RPM heads
Edelbrock Performer Plus camshaft/followers
Edelbrock Performer intake manifold
New Carb (I'll get more details on this later)
High capacity oil pump, bored pickup and sump to match
New pushrods










The engine has been part built in preparation to fitting





The suspension, brakes and paintwork all need attention. The plan is recommission the mechanics, fit the engine and get it on the road, worrying about the paintwork at a later date.

It's currently sat with most of the under-bonnet parts removed waiting to be de-greased before the

suspension/steering/brakes are rebuilt. The the engine can be dropped back in.

Here are a few photos showing the rest of the car









I'll be keeping this updated when I can, progress will be slow due to other projects, but when I'm up at

my parents I'll take photos and get a status report if anythings moved on whilst I've been away.

JCW

905 posts

236 months

Monday 30th April 2012
quotequote all
Look forward to hearing more. Good luck with the project.

bob1179

14,138 posts

238 months

Monday 30th April 2012
quotequote all
I do love a good Interceptor thread.

Looking forward to watching this too.

smile

anonymous-user

83 months

Monday 30th April 2012
quotequote all
Hoorah! Another nutter!

My mark II is in for a bare metal respray. Let's hope there is some actual metal there!

bob1179

14,138 posts

238 months

Monday 30th April 2012
quotequote all
Breadvan72 said:
Hoorah! Another nutter!

My mark II is in for a bare metal respray. Let's hope there is some actual metal there!
I hope you're going to post up some piccies of the work being done (complete with sideburns and steel rimmed glasses) for our perusement.

smile

dbdb

5,175 posts

202 months

Monday 30th April 2012
quotequote all
Ah, I can never get tired of looking at the Jensen Interceptor. It is possibly my favourite car - certainly one of them. This is my favourite version too; the MkIII 'J' Series. Just fabulous!!

runt

314 posts

256 months

Tuesday 1st May 2012
quotequote all
Any Interceptor with minimal body rot is great news, interior looks unmolested also, 440 motor spec sounds exciting, these were so lightly stressed, and strangled down to ..290 horse as listed in the Mark 3..? Huge potential from one of my fave Yank V-8s,yes please keep us posted on this resurrection of a lovely car.

Paul/runt

Johnspex

5,237 posts

213 months

Tuesday 1st May 2012
quotequote all
You gotta love Interceptors. It's strange that the intrior is so nive and yet they put that bloody awful steering wheel in it.

anonymous-user

83 months

Tuesday 1st May 2012
quotequote all
Not in all of them. This is an original steering wheel for a Mark II. The horrid wheel was in the Mark III. You can fit a decent three spoke wheel in its place:-



Byteme

450 posts

171 months

Sunday 10th June 2012
quotequote all
Task

Good luck on you project.

Whoever specified the parts for the engine clearly had a goal in mind. Initially I thought the pistons were from Keith Black but I don't remember that particular pattern for the Chrysler 440 engine. While the engine is stripped I would try and find out more about them so you can calculate you final compression ratio, not forgetting that this will be dependent on your final choice of head gaskets.

The raised area on the piston crown converts the later stepped non-quench 440 heads to quench just like the early flat heads. The piston manufacturer may therefor have specific instuctions to ensure the correct clearance between the raised platform on the crown and underside of the head. This can involve removal of material from the block or head faces which introduces other machining processes to other components including the manifold and push rods.

A call to Edelbrock's tech team may also be useful once you have identified the pistons, just to make sure everything is compatible. Their cylinder heads are intended as a "bolt-on" part to match the standard pattern pistons and therefor may not be best suited to modified aftermarket ones.

neutral 3

8,492 posts

199 months

Monday 11th June 2012
quotequote all
Love Interceptors !

Re the Edelbrock goodies, in the mid 90s I built an engine for my 69 350 cu Stingray and used a Performer RPM Cam , RPM inlet manifold, 750 Holley and Headman Headers. Unfortunately I ran out of cash so couldn't fit their Alloy Matching heads and had to use from memory what were called Smog heads.

However, my car ( a 4 speed ) went really well, despite the it being way too heavy. I was Very impressed with the Edelbrock parts and would definately use them again .

Dr Interceptor

8,183 posts

225 months

Monday 11th June 2012
quotequote all
Excellent biggrin

Agree on the steering wheel - that's the only thing that isn't standard on my Convertible, as I've replaced the MKIII wheel for a MKII one (as pictured above).

Much nicer to hold, and look at smile

Look forward to updates on this project as they come through smile

task

Original Poster:

418 posts

200 months

Wednesday 14th November 2012
quotequote all



Having removed the old engine from the body we were left with a bit of a mess, the area was washed down with degreaser and all the parts not normally accesible when the engine is in were refreshed.
The heat-proofing material was replaced and the torque converter checked for issues.



The engine was lowered back in and mated to the gearbox





The heads/front cover/manifolds were then bolted on





That's all for the moment, more updates soon!

Tyre Smoke

23,018 posts

290 months

Thursday 15th November 2012
quotequote all
Was that a conscious decision, the horrible orange engine block?

Well done on the work though, love Interceptors.

Huntsman

9,310 posts

279 months

Thursday 15th November 2012
quotequote all
task said:
The heat-proofing material was replaced and the torque converter checked for issues.
Looking good. What did you use for the heat proofing stuff?

anonymous-user

83 months

Thursday 15th November 2012
quotequote all
I could do with some of that for mine.

task

Original Poster:

418 posts

200 months

Thursday 22nd November 2012
quotequote all
Huntsman said:
Looking good. What did you use for the heat proofing stuff?
It came from Woolies.


The block is apparently painted "mopar orange", it arrived like that.

IroningMan

10,598 posts

275 months

Thursday 22nd November 2012
quotequote all
Tidy, as I believe they say.

Why on earth not build up the engine outside the car?

Ubendum

105 posts

166 months

Friday 23rd November 2012
quotequote all
for my first post on here, I have one comment, and one question.

First, those cast exhaust manifolds in the photo do not work with Eddy's heads, you must use headers. If you need to use cast manifolds, you should junk the heads, and use the MP5153524, or of course, the correct iron heads.

Question: Does that engine have a cast or forged crank? If its cast, you need to pull the engine out...

SV8Predator

2,102 posts

194 months

Friday 23rd November 2012
quotequote all
Ubendum said:
Question: Does that engine have a cast or forged crank?


You tell us - you can see the damper in the pic above.