Best watch for around 600
Best watch for around 600
Author
Discussion

Stubbsy

Original Poster:

147 posts

189 months

Tuesday 1st May 2012
quotequote all
As the title says peeps.
Found a Raymond Weil one for 600 which I quite like any other potential alternatives?

rich85uk

4,388 posts

210 months

Tuesday 1st May 2012
quotequote all
Stowa?

Hoofy

80,169 posts

313 months

Tuesday 1st May 2012
quotequote all
Longines something?

daveenty

2,385 posts

241 months

Tuesday 1st May 2012
quotequote all
Have a look at Christopher Ward.

Very nice.

GC8

19,910 posts

221 months

Tuesday 1st May 2012
quotequote all
Id be looking at a larger (of the two sizes) Longines Hydroconquest automatic. Youll have to put a few pounds to, but it provides far better value than CW watches, whose price just rises and rises...

jonny70

1,280 posts

189 months

Tuesday 1st May 2012
quotequote all
Which Raymond Weil?

what styles do you like?

Hoofy

80,169 posts

313 months

Tuesday 1st May 2012
quotequote all
GC8 said:
Id be looking at a larger (of the two sizes) Longines Hydroconquest automatic. Youll have to put a few pounds to, but it provides far better value than CW watches, whose price just rises and rises...
Mm. As much as I like them (I've handled a couple of watches and have nothing bad to say about them), I just couldn't bring myself to pay the current prices. Perhaps their mistake was selling them so cheaply in the first place?

DKL

4,996 posts

253 months

Tuesday 1st May 2012
quotequote all
Does it have to be new? If not your options are much greater. I'd go for a Tudor prince date at that money.

SWAT78

1,079 posts

214 months

Wednesday 2nd May 2012
quotequote all
I got a Hamilton auto as a wedding present from my wife at that sort of price, and love it.

Stubbsy

Original Poster:

147 posts

189 months

Wednesday 2nd May 2012
quotequote all
jonny70 said:
Which Raymond Weil?

what styles do you like?
Jonny pretty much set on the link below
http://www.raymond-weil.com/EN/Mens-Watches/Tradit...
My style I am after is plain and understated nothin to in ya face!!

Stubbsy

Original Poster:

147 posts

189 months

Wednesday 2nd May 2012
quotequote all
DKL said:
Does it have to be new? If not your options are much greater. I'd go for a Tudor prince date at that money.
Ideally yes just looked them up they look similar to rolexes which is not my thing!

Stubbsy

Original Poster:

147 posts

189 months

Wednesday 2nd May 2012
quotequote all
GC8 said:
Id be looking at a larger (of the two sizes) Longines Hydroconquest automatic. Youll have to put a few pounds to, but it provides far better value than CW watches, whose price just rises and rises...
I like longines also but I am trying to keep to my budget and they are a bit more than 600 unless someone can show me otherwise!

Stubbsy

Original Poster:

147 posts

189 months

Tuesday 8th May 2012
quotequote all
Got my watch at the weekend.
Tried the Raymond Veil on didn't like it so went for gucci timeless in the end! Was a bit cheaper than the Raymond veil also so very happy with my choice!

Stubbsy

Original Poster:

147 posts

189 months

Tuesday 8th May 2012
quotequote all
Got my watch at the weekend.
Tried the Raymond Veil on didn't like it so went for gucci timeless in the end! Was a bit cheaper than the Raymond veil also so very happy with my choice!

Stubbsy

Original Poster:

147 posts

189 months

Tuesday 8th May 2012
quotequote all
Got my watch at the weekend.
Tried the Raymond Veil on didn't like it so went for gucci timeless in the end! Was a bit cheaper than the Raymond veil also so very happy with my choice!

Stupidlikeafox

794 posts

209 months

Wednesday 9th May 2012
quotequote all
You bought three of them? wink

Stubbsy

Original Poster:

147 posts

189 months

Thursday 10th May 2012
quotequote all
Stupidlikeafox said:
You bought three of them? wink
Ha ha god knows what happened there I posted off my I phone!
No I didn't get three of em however did end buying a tissot also!!

GC8

19,910 posts

221 months

Thursday 10th May 2012
quotequote all
A step in the right direction, at least.

Stubbsy

Original Poster:

147 posts

189 months

Thursday 10th May 2012
quotequote all
GC8 said:
A step in the right direction, at least.
Hmmm you dont agree with my Gucci choice then over Raymond veil?!

GC8

19,910 posts

221 months

Thursday 10th May 2012
quotequote all
There was a time when a Gucci watch was where it started and ended for me. I was 16-18yrs old and a number of friends had all bought something similar. I knew little about decent watches (nor did they!)and only Gucci and Rolex were on my radar.

They spent £500-odd on Gucci and I saved for a Rolex, which was more, put pitifully cheap compared to todays comedy prices - actually I saved for a Gucci but by the time I had enough Id already decided thata a Date was where it was at for me. It seemed like a better buy for not that much more. I struck out on my own and didnt get the Rolex, but I did buy a TAG Heuer 4000 bi-colour automatic in 1991, before their new found, new money popularity and Ive been actively interested in and learning about watches ever since.

Gucci isnt what Id have chosen; certainly not since 1988! biggrin