Planet Earth ....LIVE!
Author
Discussion

Lordbenny

Original Poster:

8,754 posts

250 months

Sunday 6th May 2012
quotequote all
Not very 'Live' as yet, unless you count Richard Hammond sitting in a directors chair talking...'Live'! Im sure It'll be great, its all the BBC can do right these days!

y2blade

56,322 posts

246 months

Sunday 6th May 2012
quotequote all
We are watching it here too smile

ajprice

33,591 posts

227 months

Sunday 6th May 2012
quotequote all
Me too.

ajprice

33,591 posts

227 months

Sunday 6th May 2012
quotequote all
Planet Earth: PRERECORDED!! hehe

Lordbenny

Original Poster:

8,754 posts

250 months

Sunday 6th May 2012
quotequote all
Ummmm, so far the few highlights have been the recorded images of monkeys 'bombing' into the water and some baby elephants....apart from that....too much Hammond, a bit disappointing. Hope it gets better over the weeks. frown

Shaw Tarse

31,904 posts

234 months

Sunday 6th May 2012
quotequote all
Not too keen on the choice of presenters.
But bear cubs are cute.

Granville

983 posts

202 months

Monday 7th May 2012
quotequote all
The presenters don't work for me, but then Richard Hammond gets on my nerves regardless. Odd choice picking him for this kind of programme and Julia Bradbury is just on everything of late.

Very cute bear cubs though

sinizter

3,348 posts

217 months

Monday 7th May 2012
quotequote all
Caught the last of it ...

Not very 'live', but still good. Hammond is OK, the woman not so much - IMO. The program still works.

Edited by sinizter on Monday 7th May 10:08

durbster

12,141 posts

253 months

Monday 7th May 2012
quotequote all
Didn't really think much to the concept but didn't watch the whole thing so may be wrong. There's a reason Attenborough's documentaries take months to film and edit; nature spends the vast majority of its time doing sod all. I can't see how being there LIVE is going to make for good entertainment.

sinizter

3,348 posts

217 months

Monday 7th May 2012
quotequote all
durbster said:
Didn't really think much to the concept but didn't watch the whole thing so may be wrong. There's a reason Attenborough's documentaries take months to film and edit; nature spends the vast majority of its time doing sod all. I can't see how being there LIVE is going to make for good entertainment.
It's edited and they keep flicking from one location to another to avoid the time when nature does 'sod all'.

oldmanbm

498 posts

236 months

Monday 7th May 2012
quotequote all
Yes photography is excellent and concept promising but Richard Hammond has the emotional depth of a postage stamp and poor old Julia wants to back home with her first born. I also deeply resent how nature has been scripted into an Eastenders type 'will she, won't she return to her 'children'(the lions)? scenario. We are dealing with cruel unsanitized nature and we are doing it a disservice by wrapping it up cotton wool. It can only get better!

Halb

53,012 posts

214 months

Thursday 10th May 2012
quotequote all
Wow.
Just had one some killer whales killing a grey whale calf, and some humpback trying to intervene and stop it from happening.

Morningside

24,147 posts

260 months

Thursday 10th May 2012
quotequote all
Interesting, but too much talking and action sequences are too short. Plus a lot of 'dead air' as they wait for linkup or crossover.

As for Hammond, why is he live from a tent? Dont see him wandering live! May as well be in London with a world link.

I will say that its a good use of high def.

jmorgan

36,010 posts

315 months

Friday 11th May 2012
quotequote all
Kept missing this but 10/10 for effort at least? I noticed the other side had some sort of karaoke show on.

iphonedyou

10,424 posts

188 months

Friday 11th May 2012
quotequote all
I think it's pretty great, really.

The footage of the Humpback intervention in the Grey / Orca debacle was worth putting the show on for alone, in my view. I can also very much understand the point of using emotion, and following the story of each group of animals. Should hopefully engage the next generation of animal lovers smile

I don't understand the point, above, about Julia wanting to be home with her first born. Can you point to anything suggesting this (other than the fact she has a first born, obviously.)