FARNBOROUGH 04

[trackdemon]

My pics from Farnborough. Quality variable as the camera is new to me so I've not quite got a handle on it yet, I also got a little shutter happy with a 512MB card! The pics are large (1500 width or height) but the file size is small as I've resaved in PS and reduced the quality a little. Some here:











The rest here: http://elysianconsultants.co.uk/stephenhall/Farnborough_04

[simpo two]

trackdemon said:

The pics are large (1500 width or height) but the file size is small as I've resaved in PS and reduced the quality a little. Some here:

Nice pix but still way too big, esp for dial-up guys. Try reducing the image size to 800 pixels max and get file size under 100K. You can reduce JPEG quality to 3 or 4 without visible difference for web applications

[chrisjl]

simpo two said:

Nice pix but still way too big, esp for dial-up guys. Try reducing the image size to 800 pixels max and get file size under 100K. You can reduce JPEG quality to 3 or 4 without visible difference for web applications

3 or 4 on what scale? Which app?

PSP scale goes the other way, 1 being best quality, 99 being worst. Compression starts to become noticable above 30.

Using ImageMagick, where lower == more compression, a quality of 4 produces shockingly bad hugely pixelated images with about half a dozen colours in.

[trackdemon]

Just updated the pics to a more manageable size and tweaked to correct colours etc:

http://elysianconsultants.co.uk/stephenhall/Farnborough_04