Speed camera manager resigns
Discussion
RICHARD BALLS EDP24
28 July 2004 08:00
Norfolk's speed camera boss has resigned after being presented with the initial findings of a review into the siting of the controversial cameras, it emerged last night.
Barry Parnell, manager of the Norfolk Casualty Reduction Partnership (NCRP), stepped down shortly after seeing the interim report arising from the study ordered by Chief Constable Andy Hayman in a bid to ensure the cameras fitted the required criteria.
It is understood the highly confidential report, which will not be made public until September, is critical of the selection of some fixed camera locations.
The in-depth investigation came after an earlier study by the police found the data to justify the siting of some cameras was questionable and, in some cases, unavailable.
One notorious speed camera – in Grapes Hill, Norwich – was decommissioned in April because its positioning could not be justified.
Norfolk Police Authority has called for far greater transparency and accountability over where the cameras are located, the criteria used and the evidence on which decisions are made.
Supt Mark Veljovic, chairman of the partnership, confirmed Mr Parnell had handed in his resignation, but would not comment on the circumstances surrounding his decision.
A temporary replacement will be put in place from Monday while a new partnership manager is recruited.
Mr Parnell is on annual leave and is due to formally leave his post towards the end of August. He has worked for the force as a civilian for about 16 years and previously managed its administration of justice department.
The NCRP was launched in October 2001 and includes representatives from the police, Norfolk County Council, the Highways Agency, Norfolk Magistrates Courts Committee, the Crown Prosecution Service, Norfolk primary care trusts and the University of East Anglia.
It came almost 18 months after the Government unveiled a road safety strategy aimed at reducing the number of people killed or seriously injured by 40pc by 2010.
There are now 18 fixed 'yellow box' enforcement sites and four mobile camera units are deployed across 72 other high casualty locations.
According to the partnership, all the sites have a three-year history of at least two killed or serious injury collisions where speed was a factor per kilometre and it stresses that camera enforcement only takes place across 106 km of the county's 10,000 km of road.
Over its second year of operations, which ended in September 2003, the number of people seriously injured at the sites where cameras are used fell by 54pc compared with the average figure over the previous three years.
The use of speed cameras is a highly controversial issue nationally and Norfolk is no exception. Many people simply see the camera schemes as a money-making exercise and even some of those motorists who support their use are sceptical about the need for them at specific locations.
A NCRP newsletter produced this year says the partnership collected £1,125,490 in fixed penalty fines, just £70 more than its expenditure.
Website: www.norfolk-safety-camera.org.uk
28 July 2004 08:00
Norfolk's speed camera boss has resigned after being presented with the initial findings of a review into the siting of the controversial cameras, it emerged last night.
Barry Parnell, manager of the Norfolk Casualty Reduction Partnership (NCRP), stepped down shortly after seeing the interim report arising from the study ordered by Chief Constable Andy Hayman in a bid to ensure the cameras fitted the required criteria.
It is understood the highly confidential report, which will not be made public until September, is critical of the selection of some fixed camera locations.
The in-depth investigation came after an earlier study by the police found the data to justify the siting of some cameras was questionable and, in some cases, unavailable.
One notorious speed camera – in Grapes Hill, Norwich – was decommissioned in April because its positioning could not be justified.
Norfolk Police Authority has called for far greater transparency and accountability over where the cameras are located, the criteria used and the evidence on which decisions are made.
Supt Mark Veljovic, chairman of the partnership, confirmed Mr Parnell had handed in his resignation, but would not comment on the circumstances surrounding his decision.
A temporary replacement will be put in place from Monday while a new partnership manager is recruited.
Mr Parnell is on annual leave and is due to formally leave his post towards the end of August. He has worked for the force as a civilian for about 16 years and previously managed its administration of justice department.
The NCRP was launched in October 2001 and includes representatives from the police, Norfolk County Council, the Highways Agency, Norfolk Magistrates Courts Committee, the Crown Prosecution Service, Norfolk primary care trusts and the University of East Anglia.
It came almost 18 months after the Government unveiled a road safety strategy aimed at reducing the number of people killed or seriously injured by 40pc by 2010.
There are now 18 fixed 'yellow box' enforcement sites and four mobile camera units are deployed across 72 other high casualty locations.
According to the partnership, all the sites have a three-year history of at least two killed or serious injury collisions where speed was a factor per kilometre and it stresses that camera enforcement only takes place across 106 km of the county's 10,000 km of road.
Over its second year of operations, which ended in September 2003, the number of people seriously injured at the sites where cameras are used fell by 54pc compared with the average figure over the previous three years.
The use of speed cameras is a highly controversial issue nationally and Norfolk is no exception. Many people simply see the camera schemes as a money-making exercise and even some of those motorists who support their use are sceptical about the need for them at specific locations.
A NCRP newsletter produced this year says the partnership collected £1,125,490 in fixed penalty fines, just £70 more than its expenditure.
Website: www.norfolk-safety-camera.org.uk
C C said:
A NCRP newsletter produced this year says the partnership collected £1,125,490 in fixed penalty fines, just £70 more than its expenditure.
I wonder how many councillors are getting backhanders from the DickTurpins?????
Glad to see someone has had the moral fibre NOT to support all the lies being told!!!!!!
£70 difference. If that doesn't convince people something dodgy is going on, I don't know what will.
I suspect there is some dodgy accounting going on, or a policy of spend everything they tax people on. I fear there may well be corruption of the highest order inside the scameraships and would welcome an independant audit to disprove my fears!
I suspect there is some dodgy accounting going on, or a policy of spend everything they tax people on. I fear there may well be corruption of the highest order inside the scameraships and would welcome an independant audit to disprove my fears!
BliarOut said:
£70 difference. If that doesn't convince people something dodgy is going on, I don't know what will.
I suspect there is some dodgy accounting going on, or a policy of spend everything they tax people on. I fear there may well be corruption of the highest order inside the scameraships and would welcome an independant audit to disprove my fears!
Another question for Steve -
How's about providing list of expenditure - would like to know how much the advert on the back of the bust cost! (Don't let your driving say it with flowers")
How much thought went into that one then?
C C said:
RICHARD BALLS EDP24
28 July 2004 08:00
A NCRP newsletter produced this year says the partnership collected £1,125,490 in fixed penalty fines, just £70 more than its expenditure.
That's just a load of b@lls.
All they need to do it rake in large salaries and bonuses for themselves to keep down the declared excess cash.
From the false justification of the cameras in the first place, to the revenue-based siting of the cameras to the creative accounting, the whole bl00dy lot stinks!
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff