Sky 3DTV
Author
Discussion

LordGrover

Original Poster:

34,189 posts

243 months

Friday 11th May 2012
quotequote all
Not sure if should be here or computers & gadgets? Anyway...

Do 3D programmes/films take up more disk space than HD or the same?
If I go the 3D route I'm considering upgrading to the 1TB box but at £150 I'll do without if feasible.

VEX

5,259 posts

277 months

Friday 11th May 2012
quotequote all
Shouldn't do, it should take the same as an HD recording. Because that is effectively what it is, an HD image split into two slightly different side by side images.

V.

fadeaway

1,463 posts

257 months

Saturday 12th May 2012
quotequote all
erm, wouldn't it take twice as much space, as storing 2X the video. Or does it compound the two feeds into one?

davepoth

29,395 posts

230 months

Saturday 12th May 2012
quotequote all
fadeaway said:
erm, wouldn't it take twice as much space, as storing 2X the video. Or does it compound the two feeds into one?
3D is two images at half of HD I think; it adds up to the same as HD.

KieronGSi

1,114 posts

235 months

Saturday 12th May 2012
quotequote all
I have Avatar 3d recorded on my sky+ box and it takes up 8% at 169 minutes long. Adding up other HD recordings up to 169 minutes they average between 3-4%. So on that basis id say it takes about twice as much space as an HD recording.