Would you adopt a Chrystal or Shampagner?

[Happy82]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2140586/Sc...


Basically there are a lot of kids who go unadopted because their chav scum families decided to give them stupid names that are more suited to a porn star stage name, the social workers refuse to have these names changed and let's face it, what middle class family would want a child called Diesel, Shampagner or Muskadette?

Seems a bit of a sad situation for the children, although I imagine they're still better off in care than with the pond life that could be their parents and guiding light in life

[McClure]

Aren't social workers supposed to do what is best for the child? If so change the bloody stupid names!

[McClure]

This country really needs to grow some balls.

Bottom-feeders pop out kids quicker more often than they go for job interviews; can't look after them or abuse them so the kids get taken into care; then there's a generation of kids who have very little chance in life; but nothing is done about the scummers causing the problem for fear of upsetting them/"breaching their human rights".

[dom180]

Incentives and disincentives...

Of course, it might not the case that people don't want to adopt them because of their names but because of their chav DNA as evidenced by their names....

[Hooli]

dom180 said:

Incentives and disincentives...

Of course, it might not the case that people don't want to adopt them because of their names but because of their chav DNA as evidenced by their names....

You can take the chav out of a stehole but...

[glazbagun]

Happy82 said:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2140586/Sc...


Basically there are a lot of kids who go unadopted because their chav scum families decided to give them stupid names that are more suited to a porn star stage name, the social workers refuse to have these names changed and let's face it, what middle class family would want a child called Diesel, Shampagner or Muskadette?

I read it that there are a lot of kids who go unadopted because there's a shortage of willing/able foster parents, but the Daily Mail require something more divisive to make it a story worthy of their arse rag of a paper.