Sigma 10-20 vs Tokina 11-16
Sigma 10-20 vs Tokina 11-16
Author
Discussion

4Lmike

Original Poster:

1,910 posts

199 months

Tuesday 15th May 2012
quotequote all
I'm thinking of trading in my Sigma 10-20 for the Tokina 11-16 f2.8. Does anyone have any knowledge of these? Or experiences of both?

anonymous-user

83 months

Tuesday 15th May 2012
quotequote all
I have the Tokina and I honestly cannot recommend it enough.

It's absolutely built like a tank, virtually all metal. It reeks of quality when you handle it.

The front of the lens where the filter thread is doesn't move or rotate so it's great for use with directional filters such as a CPL.

It's quick to focus and the push/pull way of engaging and disengaging manual focus is spot on.

As for image quality it's great, really sharp. If I'm doing a landscape of long exposure cityscape I set it to about F8 and images come out pin sharp pretty much.

It's useful for so much, I shoot car shows a lot with it, and also use it for nightclub work where it has also proved invaluable. Suprisingly good for low light funky portraits or group shots!

I bought mine after reading rave reviews and I concur with them.

Highly recommended.

No experience with the sigma sorry!

Gad-Westy

16,561 posts

242 months

Tuesday 15th May 2012
quotequote all
I've had both though I don't have either now as moved to FF.

The Tokina is head and shoulders the better lens. Sharper, less distortion, flare control, wider aperture, better built etc...

The only things that would persuade me to go for the Sigma is that A) it is much cheaper (assuming you mean the F4-5.6 version?) and a very nice lens for the money and B) It has a more useful range than the Tokina, which can feel a bit too wide sometimes.


londonagent

635 posts

197 months

Tuesday 15th May 2012
quotequote all
I've been contemplating going FF, and don't really want to get rid of my 10-20mm Sigma lens. Apparently some people are using the sigma 10-20mm on a 5D by adding a Kenko 1.4x converter, which although you lose about 1 stop turns it into a 14-28mm lens. Seeing G-W's post above thought I'd share this, in case anyone else is in the same boat.

dibbly dobbler

11,489 posts

226 months

Tuesday 15th May 2012
quotequote all
Mike - any reason you're not considering the Canon 10-22 ?

I went from the 10-20 to the 10-22 a while back and in all honesty haven't noticed a massive improvement but the 10-22 certainly comes highly recommended (by people that presumaby know a lot more than me) smile

4Lmike

Original Poster:

1,910 posts

199 months

Tuesday 15th May 2012
quotequote all
dibbly dobbler said:
Mike - any reason you're not considering the Canon 10-22 ?
I've got a Nikon wink

4Lmike

Original Poster:

1,910 posts

199 months

Tuesday 15th May 2012
quotequote all
Thanks for the info guys. I'm getting very temped by the Tokina so will probably take the plunge

londonagent

635 posts

197 months

Tuesday 15th May 2012
quotequote all
4Lmike said:
dibbly dobbler said:
Mike - any reason you're not considering the Canon 10-22 ?
I've got a Nikon wink
laughlaugh

dibbly dobbler

11,489 posts

226 months

Tuesday 15th May 2012
quotequote all
londonagent said:
4Lmike said:
dibbly dobbler said:
Mike - any reason you're not considering the Canon 10-22 ?
I've got a Nikon wink
laughlaugh
rofl I really am the biggest knob ever to have drawn breath!

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

283 months

Tuesday 15th May 2012
quotequote all
Buy a canon then!

I've had the 10-20, Ok but not fantastic, if I stuck with crop I would have got the tokina 11-16.

Remember though there is a mkII 11-16 coming out soon with better anti flare coatings etc.

4Lmike

Original Poster:

1,910 posts

199 months

Wednesday 16th May 2012
quotequote all
RobDickinson said:
Remember though there is a mkII 11-16 coming out soon with better anti flare coatings etc.
Good point, I may wait for that to come out. Hopefully the Mark I ones will go down in price...

Fezant Pluckah

1,711 posts

240 months

Wednesday 16th May 2012
quotequote all
I've got the Tokina 10-17, which has been discontinued.

I use it exclusivly for underwater work, but it's a fab lens...























Also good for close focus wide angle:




trackdemon

13,422 posts

290 months

Wednesday 16th May 2012
quotequote all
I made exactly this move, the Sigma is perfectly OK but for 50-60% more £££ the Tokina is head and shoulders above it - and every other WA DX I've used. Going by various reviews, its the best DX WA there is and I've no reason to doubt it - sharpness, contrast, flare resistance, build etc. are all top drawer; f2.8 - although was not my primary reason for purchase - is very useful on occasion. I no longer wonder if my images are going to be compromised in the corners like the Sigma sometimes was (softness even @ f11). 11-16 plenty range for me, I have an 18-200VRII as well (excellent lense up to 120-130mm btw) so I can live without 16-18mm. In summary - do it!

4Lmike

Original Poster:

1,910 posts

199 months

Wednesday 16th May 2012
quotequote all
Thanks - I think I will definitely go for it, it's just a matter of when...

4Lmike

Original Poster:

1,910 posts

199 months

Wednesday 16th May 2012
quotequote all
Now I have a dilemma - do I buy it from UK for £530 or a respected seller in Hong Kong for around £400??

dxbtiger

4,546 posts

202 months

Wednesday 16th May 2012
quotequote all
I've been mulling this over for a while, my mate has the Tokina, I just think I would prefer the extra range of the Sigma.... hmmmmm

Gad-Westy

16,561 posts

242 months

Wednesday 16th May 2012
quotequote all
dxbtiger said:
I've been mulling this over for a while, my mate has the Tokina, I just think I would prefer the extra range of the Sigma.... hmmmmm
The Tokina 12-24 is pretty damn good too...

anonymous-user

83 months

Wednesday 16th May 2012
quotequote all
4Lmike said:
Now I have a dilemma - do I buy it from UK for £530 or a respected seller in Hong Kong for around £400??
I got mine from a camera and lens dealer Hong Kong for £400 and didn't have any problems.
Arrived very promptly, perfect condition, well packaged and fully sealed in original retail box.

Its the same item.. why pay an extra £130!?

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

283 months

Wednesday 16th May 2012
quotequote all
NinjaPower said:
I got mine from a camera and lens dealer Hong Kong for £400 and didn't have any problems.
Arrived very promptly, perfect condition, well packaged and fully sealed in original retail box.

Its the same item.. why pay an extra £130!?
See thats the issue, you had no problems, its when you do have problems that you want a local supplier.

Killwilly

446 posts

217 months

Thursday 17th May 2012
quotequote all
NinjaPower said:
I got mine from a camera and lens dealer Hong Kong for £400 and didn't have any problems.
Arrived very promptly, perfect condition, well packaged and fully sealed in original retail box.

Its the same item.. why pay an extra £130!?
Do you get an international warranty with the manufacturer, or is it with the supplier?