What do you class as an "Abused" car
What do you class as an "Abused" car
Author
Discussion

Quinnaay

Original Poster:

91 posts

172 months

Wednesday 16th May 2012
quotequote all
Just curious to peoples interpretations on the word Abused in car terms do you class it as being thrashed about everywere if so at what speeds/revs is thrashing it or badly maintained etc etc.

StottyZr

6,860 posts

191 months

Wednesday 16th May 2012
quotequote all
Basically yes. Thrashed around a lot, thrown around corners and not fully maintained (the bare minimum to keep the car road legal)

Wattsie

1,161 posts

229 months

Wednesday 16th May 2012
quotequote all
As far as buying a car goes, if it's been badly maintained - unmatching Linglong tyres, black sludgey oil, no sign of any attempt to service it, that kinda thing is a sign that you probably shouldn't bother.

As far as how other people treat their cars goes, I couldn't give a toss as long as I keep mine running okay.

ETA: Poor maintenance is the overall category.

6potdave

2,740 posts

241 months

Wednesday 16th May 2012
quotequote all
Just a general abused feel to the car, never cleaned, crap maintenance, driven hard from cold etc. Driving a performance car hard is not my idea of abuse if done properly.

Frances The Mute

1,816 posts

269 months

Wednesday 16th May 2012
quotequote all
Being abused is ignoring vital things like servicing and repairs. Being a spastic and knocking up kerbs and hitting street furniture etc is another example.

I have no problem with a car being driven hard. Just look after it if you do. Appreciably, some cars can take being driven hard more than others, but the rule still applies.

funkyrobot

18,789 posts

256 months

Wednesday 16th May 2012
quotequote all
Mismatched cheapo tyres.
Lack of servicing.
Lack of car cleanliness (a year's worth of dirt, rather than a few months. Usually shown by the carbon build up on the wheels).
Driven hard from cold (nothing wrong with driving hard if the vehicle is warm).
Rough and scruffy interior (i.e. things broken, ripped etc, not the odd stain or scuff).
Kerbed wheels and certain damage to the exterior (which would indicated that the driver doesn't really care what the car hits).

RizzoTheRat

28,649 posts

220 months

Wednesday 16th May 2012
quotequote all
"1 lady owner"

paperbag

W00DY

16,640 posts

254 months

Wednesday 16th May 2012
quotequote all
The facelift 147.

Alfa Romeo should be ashamed.

Quinnaay

Original Poster:

91 posts

172 months

Wednesday 16th May 2012
quotequote all
RizzoTheRat said:
"1 lady owner"

paperbag
Haha! brilliant, and i agree with most of the above comments some intresting opinions

Wattsie

1,161 posts

229 months

Wednesday 16th May 2012
quotequote all
funkyrobot said:
Lack of car cleanliness (a year's worth of dirt, rather than a few months. Usually shown by the carbon build up on the wheels).
I find that's a good indicator of treatment.

Case in point, a mate used to treat his Clio like a complete skip on wheels, but when he replaced it with a (much older) Zetec S, it's kept spotless and serviced extensively. The ZS is also generally taken more care of (warmed up prior to thrashing) and not ramped up onto curbs and things like the Clio was.

RizzoTheRat

28,649 posts

220 months

Wednesday 16th May 2012
quotequote all
doogz said:
So the clutch is fked then...


paperbag
A mates mother keeps her Fabia clean and tidy, and always services it on time, but its second clutch is already on the way out on a fairly low mileage car. He's trying to persuade her to go for a dsg next time.